This study investigated whether principals in high-needs schools reported different perceptions of a PSEL-based principal evaluation system than did principals in non high-needs schools. We employed a sequential mixed-methods approach in which semi-structured interviews followed an initial survey administration. High-needs and non high-needs principals reported statistically significantly different perceptions of the state’s evaluation system. We find that principals perceive wide variation in the resources allocated to their schools as well as the use of the performance rubric to measure their effectiveness. Additionally, principals identified principal supervisors as a major lever in the perceived fairness and flexibility of the evaluation system.
BailesL. P.GutheryS. (2020). Held down and held back: The cost of systematically delayed principal promotions. AERA Open, 6(1), 1–17.
3.
BauerS. C.SilverL.SchwartzerJ. (2019). The impact of isolation on new principals’ persistence: Evidence from a southern US state. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739359
4.
BloomG.DanilovichD. L.FogelJ. (2005). Passing the baton: A new program from ACSA and the New Teacher Center at UC Santa Cruz is improving the way a new generation of site leaders is prepared and supported. Leadership, 35(1), 30–33.
5.
BoyceJ.BowersA. J. (2018). Toward an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: Meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(2), 161–182.
6.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
7.
CampbellS. L. (2020). Ratings in black and white: A quantcrit examination of race and gender in teacher evaluation reform. Race Ethnicity and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1842345
8.
CieminskiA. B. (2018). Practices that support leadership succession and principal retention. Education Leadership Review, 19(1), 21–41.
9.
CliffordM.Behrstock-SherrattE.FettersJ. (2012). The ripple effect: A synthesis of research on principal influence to inform performance evaluation design. American Institute for Research.
10.
CliffordM.HansenU. J.WraightS. (2014). A practical guide to designing comprehensive principal evaluation systems: A tool to assist in the development of principal evaluation systems. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
11.
CliffordM.RossS. (2011). Designing principal evaluation systems: Research to guide decision-making. American Institutes for Research, 1–12.
12.
CosnerS.JonesM. F. (2016). Leading school-wide improvement in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability: Key actions and considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(1), 41–57.
13.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2015). Model principal supervisor professional standards 2015. Author.
14.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
15.
DavisS.KearneyK.SandersN.ThomasC.LeonR. (2011). The policies and practices of principal evaluation: A review of the literature. WestEd.
16.
De JongD.GrundmeyerT.YankeyJ. (2017). Identifying and addressing themes of job dissatisfaction for secondary principals. School Leadership & Management, 37(4), 354–371.
17.
DeMatthewsD. E.SchefferM.KotokS. (2021). Useful or useless? Principal perceptions of the Texas principal evaluation and support system. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16(4), 279–304.
18.
DóciE.HofmansJ. (2015). Task complexity and transformational leadership: The mediating role of leaders’ state core self-evaluations. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), 436–447.
19.
DonaldsonM.MavrogordatoM.DoughertyS. M.GhanemR. A.YoungsP. (2021). Principal evaluation under the elementary and secondary every student succeeds act: A comprehensive policy review. Education Finance & Policy, 16(1), 1–29.
FalkR. F.MillerN. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
22.
FarleyA. N.ChildsJ.JohnsonO. A. (2019). Preparing leaders for wicked problems? How the revised PSEL and NELP standards address equity and justice. Education Policy Analysis, 27(115), 3–27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230889.pdf
23.
FullerE. J.HollingworthL. (2014). A bridge too far? Challenges in evaluating principal effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(3), 466–499.
24.
FullerE. J.HollingworthL.LiuJ. (2015). Evaluating state principal evaluation plans across the United States. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(3), 164–192.
25.
GersonJ. L. (2020). Principal perceptions of educational leader evaluation practices in Los Angeles county. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern California.
26.
GoffP.GuthrieJ. EGoldringE.BickmanL. (2014). Changing principals’ leadership through feedback and coaching. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 682–704.
27.
GoldringE.GrissomJ. A.RubinM.RogersL.NeelM.ClarkM. (2018). A new role emerges for principal supervisors: Evidence from six districts in the principal supervisor initiative. Wallace Foundation.
28.
GrissomJ. A.BlissettR. S. L.MitaniH. (2018). Evaluating school principals: Supervisor ratings of principal practice and principal job performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 446–472.
29.
GrissomJ. A.EgaliteA. J.LindsayC. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis
30.
GrissomJ. A.YoungsP. (Eds.). (2016). Improving teacher evaluation systems: Making the most of multiple measures. Teachers College Press.
31.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
32.
HvidstonD. J.McKimC. A.HolmesW. T. (2018). What are principals’ perceptions? Recommendations for improving the supervision and evaluation of principals. NASSP Bulletin, 102(3), 214–227.
33.
HvidstonD. J.RangeB. G.McKimC. A. (2015). Principals’ perceptions regarding their supervision and evaluation. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 12(3), 20–33.
34.
KlompJ. (2018). Professional standards for educational leaders and a first-year principal’s experiences: Understanding of role and responsibilities. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hofstra University.
35.
LavigneA. L.GoodT. L. (2019). Enhancing teacher education, development, and evaluation: Lessons learned from educational reform. Routledge.
36.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.
37.
LeithwoodK.PattenS.JantziD. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377347
38.
LevinS.ScottC.YangM.LeungM.BradleyK. (2020). Supporting a Strong, Stable Principal Workforce: What Matters and What Can Be Done. Research Report. Learning Policy Institute.
39.
LochmillerC. R. (2014). Leadership coaching in an induction program for novice principals: A three-year study. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775113502020
40.
LochmillerC. R. (2018). Coaching principals for the complexity of school reform. Journal of School Leadership, 28(2), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461802800201
MarshallB.CardonP.PoddarA.FontenotR. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems, 54(1), 11–22.
43.
MaxwellG. M.LockeL. A.ScheurichJ. J. (2013). Case study of three rural Texas superintendents as equity-oriented change agents. The Qualitative Report, 18(11), 1–23.
44.
McMohanM.PetersM. L.SchumacherG. (2014). The principal evaluation process and its relationship to student achievement. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 11(3), 34–48.
45.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.
46.
MizravE. (2014). Could principal autonomy produce better schools? Evidence from the schools and staffing survey. Georgetown University Institutional Repository.
MuijsD.HarrisA.ChapmanC.StollL.RussJ. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas–A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–175.
49.
MulfordB.KendallD.EwingtonJ.EdmundsB.KendallL.SilinsH. (2008). Successful principalship of high-performance schools in high-poverty communities. Journal of Educational Administration.
50.
MurphyJ. (2016). Professional standards for educational leaders: The empirical, moral, and experiential foundations. Corwin Press.
51.
National Policy Board for Educational Administrators (NPBEA). (2022). Advocacy: Official Adoption Map. https://www.npbea.org/advocacy/
52.
NelsonJ. L.GrissomJ. A.CameronM. L. (2021). Performance, process, and interpersonal relationships: Explaining principals’ perceptions of principal evaluation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(4), 641–678.
53.
NielsenS. R.LavigneA. L. (2020). Principal evaluation in the United States: A national review of state statutes and regulations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(143), 1–33. https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5097/2513
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
56.
ReevesD. (2005). Assessing educational leaders: Evaluating performance for improved individual and organizational results. Corwin.
57.
ReidD. B. (2021). US principals’ sensemaking of the future roles and responsibilities of school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 251–267.
58.
RubinM.GoldringE.NeelM. A.RogersL. K.GrissomJ. A. (2020). Changing principal supervision to develop principals’ instructional leadership capacity. In Exploring Principal Development and Teacher Outcomes (pp. 41–55). Routledge.
59.
SaylorM.BailesL. P.VanGronigenB. A.HolodickM.HammerschmidtC. (2021). Examining a State Initiative to Enhance Assistant Principal Growth and Development. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Columbus, OH.
60.
ScheerensJ.BoskerR. (1997). The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Pergamon.
61.
SinnemaC. J.RobinsonV. M. (2012). Goal setting in principal evaluation: Goal quality and predictors of achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(2), 135–167.
62.
SocorsoA. (2022). Educator evaluation lead quarter meeting [PowerPoint slides]. Delaware Department of Education: Theory of Action.
63.
SteinbergM. P.SartainL. (2021). What explains the race gap in teacher performance ratings? Evidence from Chicago public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 60–82.
64.
StrongeJ. H. (2006). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (2nd ed.). Corwin.
65.
SunM.YoungsP.YangH.ChuH.ZhaoQ. (2012). Association of district principal evaluation with learning-centered leadership practice: Evidence from Michigan and Beijing. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 24(1), 189–213.
66.
SupervilleD. R. (2014). Education department puts a spotlight on principal’s central role. Education Week, 34(13), 10–11.
67.
TekleselassieA. A.VillarrealPIII. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251–293.
68.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA.HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
69.
TurnbullB. J.RileyD. L.MacFarlaneJ. R. (2014). Cultivating talent through a principal pipeline: Building a stronger principalship: Volume 2. Policy Studies Associates, Inc. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555868.pdf
70.
WilliamsE.PersaudG.TurnersT. (2008). Planning for principal evaluation: Effects on school climate and achievement. Educational Planning, 17(3), 1–11.
71.
ZepedaS. J.LanoueP. D.PriceN. F.JimenezA. M. (2014). Principal evaluation–linking individual and building-level progress: Making the connections and embracing the tensions. School Leadership and Management, 34(4), 324–351.
