Recent federal legislation has created strong incentives for states to adopt principal evaluation systems, many of which include new measures of principal effectiveness such as estimates of student growth and changes in school climate. Yet, there has been little research on principal evaluation systems and no state-by-state analysis of the principal evaluation systems adopted at the behest of the legislation. This study uses survey data and document review to assess the components of principal evaluation systems in the 50 states and Washington, D.C. Finally, based on recent research, this study critiques the various components of these new evaluation systems.
BranchG.HanushekE.RivkenS. (2012, February). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (Working Paper No. 17803). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Review.
2.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
3.
ChiangH.LipscombS.GillB. (2012). Is school value-added indicative of principal quality? (Working paper). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
4.
CliffordM.MenonR.GangiT.CondonC.HornungK. (2012). Measuring school climate for gauging principal performance: A review of the validity and reliability of publicly accessible measures (A Quality School Leadership Issue Brief). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
5.
CliffordM.RossS. (2012). Rethinking principal evaluation: A new paradigm informed by research and practice. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals, National Association of Secondary School Principals.
6.
ClotfelterC.LaddH. F.VigdorJ.WheelerJ. (2006). High-poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. North Carolina Law Review, 85, 1345.
7.
CoelliM.GreenD. A. (2012). Leadership effects: School principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 31, 92-109.
8.
CollinsC.Amrein-BeardsleyA. (2013). Putting growth and value-added models on the map: A national overview. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1-32.
9.
Darling-HammondL. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation?Educational Researcher, 44, 132-137. doi:10.3102/0013189X15575346
10.
DavisS. H.KearneyK.SandersN. M.ThomasC.LeonR. (2011). The policies and practices of principal evaluation: A review of the literature. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
11.
EhlertM.KoedelC.ParsonsE.PodgurskyM. (2014). Selecting growth measures for use in school evaluation systems: Should proportionality matter?Educational Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0895904814557593
12.
ErdoganB. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 555-578.
13.
FitzpatrickJ. L.SandersJ. R.WorthenB. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
14.
PearsonFullerE. J.HollingworthL. (2014a). A bridge too far? Challenges in evaluating principal effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 466-499.
15.
FullerE. J.HollingworthL. (2014b, April). Evaluating principal preparation programs: Assessing the appropriateness of three accountability strategies. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
16.
FullerE. J.YoungM. D. (2009). Tenure and retention of newly hired principals in Texas. Austin, TX: University Council for Educational Administration.
17.
FullerE. J.YoungM. D.OrrM. T. (2007, April). Career pathways of principals in Texas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educaitonal Research Association, Chicago, IL.
18.
GoldhaberD. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44, 87-95.
19.
GoldringE.CravensX. C.MurphyJ.PorterA. C.ElliottS. N.CarsonB. (2009). The evaluation of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership?The Elementary School Journal, 110, 19-39.
20.
Great Teachers and Leaders. (2012). Databases on state teacher and principal evaluation policies [Data file]. Retrieved from http://resource.tqsource.org/stateevaldb/
21.
GrissomJ. A.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2014). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3-28.
22.
GullicksonA. R.HowardB. B. (Eds.). (2009). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press.
23.
HenryG. T.PurtellK. M.BastianK. C.FortnerC. K.ThompsonC. L.CampbellS. L.PattersonK. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 7-23.
24.
HorngE.KalgoridesD.LoebS. (2009). Principal preferences and the unequal distribution of principals across schools (CALDER Working Paper No. 36). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
25.
JacobsonS. (2011). Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 33-44.
26.
JacquesC.CliffordM.HornungK. (2012). State policies on principal evaluation: Trends in a changing landscape. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
27.
KaneT.StaigerD. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 91-114.
28.
KoretzD. (2008). Measuring up. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
LaddH. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 235-261.
30.
LeithwoodK.Seashore LouisK.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
31.
PetersS.BagenstosN. T. (1988, April). State mandated principal evaluation: A report on current practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
32.
PortinB.FeldmanS.KnappM. S. (2006). Purposes, uses, and practices of leadership assessment in education. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
33.
RiceJ. K. (2010). Principal effectiveness and leadership in an era of accountability: What research says (Brief 8). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
34.
SeashoreK.LeithwoodK.WahlstromK.AndersonS. (2010, July). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. Washington, DC: The Wallace Foundation.
35.
SebastianJ.AllensworthE. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 626-663.
36.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2014). State implementation of common core state standards: Evaluation of teachers and leaders. Atlanta, GA: Author.
37.
StufflebeamD.NevoD. (1991). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 24-46.
38.
Ten BruggencateG.LuytenH.ScheerensJ.SleegersP. (2012). Modeling the influence of school leaders on student achievement how can school leaders make a difference?Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 699-732.
39.
WatersT.MarzanoR. J.McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
