How Variations in State Policies and Practices Impact Student Outcomes: What Principals and Professors Need to Know

Abstract

American high school graduates’ readiness for higher education or employment in the global economy may depend on the state where they live. Since the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution makes education a state function, the 50 states and the District of Columbia vary significantly in their policies and practices for (a) preschool access and enrollment, (b) compulsory attendance, (c) instructional standards, (d) school funding, and (e) student outcomes. The variance in state requirements and student outcomes is a high-stakes equity issue. If every child is to be well educated and prepared to live productively in the 21st century, principals, professional associations, and allies can assess their own states’ policies and outcomes on these five criteria and determine where their advocacy may be needed to strengthen them.

Keywords

principal leadership student achievement PSEL state standards equity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achieve. (2015). How the states got their rates: 2014 graduates. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.achieve.org/files/15-366%20Achieve_StateGradRate2014_1215.pdf

Anderson

(1981). Instruction and time-on-task: A review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, 289-303.

Aronson

Zimmerman

Carlos

(1999). Improving student achievement by extending school: Is it just a matter of time? San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED435127.pdf

Baker

B. D.

Corcoran

S. P.

(2012). The stealth inequities of school funding: How state and local school finance systems perpetuate inequitable student spending. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535555.pdf

Baker

B. D.

Sclarra

D. G.

Farrie

(2015). Is school funding fair? A national report card. Fourth edition: Spring 2015. Newark, NJ: Education Law Center. Retrieved from http://www.edlawcenter.org/assets/files/pdfs/publications/National_Report_Card_2017.pdf

Baker

(2007). Are international tests worth anything? Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 101-104.

Balfanz

Byrnes

(2012). The importance of being in school: A report on absenteeism in the nation’s public schools. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools. Retrieved from http://new.every1graduates.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/FINALChronicAbsenteeismReport_May16.pdf

Balfanz

Herzog

MacIver

D. J.

(2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223-235.

Banicky

(2000, October). Opportunity to learn (Education Policy Brief, Vol. 7). Retrieved from http://udspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/2446/opp+to+learn.pdf;jsessionid=9FD595BD3264934974991551A4C52E96?sequence=1

10.

Barnett

W. S.

Carolan

M. E

Squires

J. H.

Clarke-Brown

(2014). State of preschool 2013: First look (NCES 2014-078). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014078.pdf

11.

Barton

P. E.

Coley

Weglinksy

(1998). Order in the classroom: Violence, discipline, and student achievement. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICORDER.pdf

12.

Blair

(2000, October 5). ETS study links effective teaching methods to test-score gains. Education Week, 20(8), 24-25.

13.

Borg

W. R.

(1980). Time and school learning. In C. Denham Lieberman

(Eds.), Time to learn (pp. 33-63). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

14.

Bromberg

Theokas

(2016). Meandering toward graduation: Transcript outcomes of high school graduates. Washington, DC: Education Trust. Retrieved from https://edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/MeanderingTowardGraduation_EdTrust_April2016.pdf

15.

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 490 (1954).

16.

Carnoy

(2015, October 30). International tests core comparisons and educational policy. A review of the critiques. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/international-test-scores

17.

Carnoy

Garcia

Khavenson

(2015, October 30). Bringing it back home. Why state comparisons are more useful than international comparisons for improving U.S. education policy (EPI Briefing Paper #410). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/files/2015/bringing-it-back-home-final-pdf.pdf

18.

Carroll

J. B.

(1963). A model for school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723-733.

19.

Cascio

E. U.

Whitmore Schanzenbach

(2014). Expanding preschool access for disadvantaged children. The Hamilton Project. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/expand_preschool_access_cascio_schanzebach.pdf

20.

Chang

H. N.

Romero

(2008). Present, engaged and accounted for: The critical importance of addressing chronic absence in the early grades. New York, NY: Columbia University; National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP), The Mailman School of Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.nccp.org/publications/pdf/text_837.pdf

21.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (NBER Working Paper No. 17699). Retrieved from http://www.rajchetty.com/chettyfiles/value_added.pdf

22.

Chicosky

C. L.

(2015). Restructuring the modern education system in the United States: A look at the value of compulsory education laws. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 1, 1-76.

23.

Cotton

(1989). Educational time factors. School Improvement Research Series. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/EducationalTimeFactors.pdf

24.

Cotton

Savard

W. G.

(1981). Time factors in learning. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

25.

Crotty

J. M.

(2014, September 29). If Massachusetts were a country, its students would rank 9th in the world. Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesmarshallcrotty/2014/09/29/if-massachusetts-were-a-country-its-students-would-rank-9th-in-the-world/#1bb56eb421b1

26.

de Mello

V. B.

(2015). Mapping state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scales: 2013 (NCES 2015-046). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/studies/pdf/2015046.pdf

27.

Dewalt

M. W.

Rodwell

(1988). Effects of increased learning time in remedial math and science. ERS Spectrum, 6(1), 33-36.

28.

Digest of Education Statistics. (2015). Age range for compulsory school attendance and special education services, and policies on year-round schools and kindergarten programs by state: Selected years 2000-2014 (Table 234.10). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_234.10.asp?current=yes

29.

Eng

(2014, May 7). Should U.S. panic over latest international creative problem-solving test scores? American School Board Journal, p. 1. Retrieved from http://www.asbj.com/HomePageCategory/Online-features/ReadingsReports/BonusArticles/Should-US-Panic-Over-Latest-International-Creative-Problem-Solving-Tests-Scores.pdf

30.

Finn

J. D.

(2002). Small classes in American schools: Research, practice, and politics. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 551-560.

31.

Fisher

C. W.

Berliner

D. C.

(Eds.). (1985). Perspectives on instructional time. New York, NY: Longman.

32.

Gerwitz

(2015, September 28). The common core explained. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/common-core-state-standards/index.html

33.

Ginsberg

Jordan

Chang

(2014). How school attendance influences student success. San Francisco, CA: Attendance Works. Retrieved from www.attendanceworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Absenses-Add-Up_September-3rd-2014.pdf

34.

Greenwald

Hedges

L. V.

Laine

R. D.

(1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.

35.

Hallenger

Heck

(2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30, 95-110.

36.

Hanover Research. (2011). A crosswalk of 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/about/strategicplan/21stCenturySkills.pdf

37.

Hanushek

E. A.

(2016, Spring). What matters for student achievement? Education Next, 16(2), 23-30. Retrieved from http://hanushek.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Hanushek%202016%20EdNext%2016%282%29.pdf

38.

Hedges

Laine

McLoughlin

(1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.

39.

Herman

Post

O’Halloran

(2013, May 2). The United States is far behind other countries on pre-K. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/InternationalECEBrief-2.pdf

40.

Hull

(2011). Time in school: How does the U.S. compare? Alexandria, VA: Center for Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Organizing-a-school/Time-in-school-How-does-the-US-compare

41.

Jackson

C. K.

Johnson

Persico

(2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 157-218.

42.

Karweit

(1984). Time-on-task reconsidered: Synthesis of research on time and learning. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 32-35.

43.

Klein

(2017, January 11). Obama’s complex legacy on K-12: Bold achievements, fierce blowback. Education Week, 36(17), 1, 16-119.

44.

Leithwood

Mascall

(2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Education Administration Quarterly, 44, 529-561.

45.

Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 624-625 (1971).

46.

Mulligan

G. M.

Hastedt

McCarroll

J. C.

(2012). First-time kindergartners in 2010-11: First findings from the kindergarten rounds of the early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 2010-11 (ECLS-K:2011) (NCES 2012-049). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012049.pdf

47.

National Access Network. (2016). Litigation. State-by-state. Access. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.

48.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2012). NAEP achievement levels. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute for Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/achievement.aspx

49.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2016). General questions. Is participation in NAEP voluntary? Washington, DC: Author, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/faq.aspx

50.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). U.S. states in a global context. Results from the 2011 NAEP-TIMSS linking study (NCES 2013-460). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/studies/pdf/2013460.pdf

51.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). State results: Massachusetts. Mathematics scores. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2012/pisa2012highlights_8b.asp

52.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=66

53.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Preschool and kindergarten enrollment. The condition of education. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cfa.asp

54.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015. Reston, VA: Author.

55.

OECD. (2012). Who participates in education? Education at a Glance. Highlights. Paris, France: Author.

56.

Ogletree

C. H.

Robinson

K. J.

(2016, May 18). Neglecting the broken foundation of K-12 funding. Education Week, 35(31), 26-27.

57.

Ravitch

(2013a). My view of the PISA Scores. Diane Ravitch’s Blog, p. 2, 18.

58.

Ravitch

(2013b). My view of the PISA Scores. Diane Ravitch’s Blog, p. 3.

59.

Rebell

(2002). Educational adequacy, democracy, and the courts. In Ready

Edley

Jr. Snow

C. E.

(Eds.), Achieving high educational standards for all (Conference Papers; pp. 218-267). Washington, DC: National Research Council.

60.

Rosenshine

B. V.

(1979). Content, time, and direct instruction. In P. L. Peterson Walberg

H. J.

(Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 28-56). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

61.

San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 30 (1973).

62.

Sanford

J. P.

Evertson

C. M.

(1983). Time use and activities in junior high classes. Journal of Educational Research, 76(3), 140-147.

63.

Schmidt

W. H.

(2012, July 7). Inequality in the American education system. Huffpost College, The Blog. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-h-schmidt/educational-inequality-system_b_1679243.html

64.

Snyder

T. D.

Dillow

S. A.

(2015). Digest of education statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

65.

Strother

D. B.

(1984). Another look at time on task. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 714-717.

66.

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393, U.S. 503, 512-513 (1969).

67.

U.S. Department of Education. (2015). A matter of equity: Preschool in America. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/documents/early-learning/matter-equity-preschool-america.pdf

68.

Walberg

(1988). Synthesis of research on time and learning. Educational Leadership, 45(6), 76-85.

69.

White House Council of Economic Advisors. (2014). The economics of early childhood investments. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/the_economics_of_early_childhood_investments.pdf

70.

Yoshikawa

Weiland

Brooks-Gunn

Burchinal

Espinosa

Gormley

. . . Zaslow

M. J.

(2013). Investing in our future: The evidence base for preschool education (Policy brief). New York, NY: Society for Research in Child Development and the Foundation for Child Development. Retrieved from https://www.fcd-us.org/the-evidence-base-on-preschool/