This case study reveals the development and action research work of a student in a newly designed educational doctorate aimed at preparing scholarly and influential practitioners. Data were gathered from a research journal, field notes, email correspondence, observation, and dissertation work, and analyzed with a constant comparative approach. Results tell the story of leadership development and action research that discovered the failure of professional development, the importance of teacher efficacy, and ways to build efficacy with knowledge and feedback. Findings from this case have implications for program developers and doctoral students wishing to become action researchers and agents of change.
Amrein-BeardsleyA.ZamboD.MooreD. W.BussR. R.PerryN. J.PainterS. R.PuckettK. S. (2012). Graduates respond to an innovative educational doctorate program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7, 98-122.
2.
AndersonG. L.HerrK.NihlenA. S. (2007). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
3.
AtwehB.KemmisS.WeeksP. (1998). Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
Author. (2011).
5.
BoudD.LeeA. (2005). “Peer learning” as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 501-516.
6.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2010). Working principles for the professional practice doctorate in education. College Park, MD: Author.
7.
CoghlanD.PedlerM. (2006). Action learning dissertations: Structure, supervision, and examination. Action Learning and Practice, 3, 127-139.
8.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
CostaA.GarmstonR. (2002). The mediator’s toolbox. Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
11.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
FullanM. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
GlasserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
14.
GoddardR. D.HoyW. K.Woolfolk HoyA. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479-507.
15.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
GuskeyT. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 381-391.
17.
HallG. E.HordS. M. (2006). Implementing change: patterns, principles, and potholes. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
18.
HendricksG. (2006). Improving schools through action research: A comprehensive guide for educators. Boston, MA: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
19.
HerrK.AndersonG. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
HordS. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of Staff Development, 30, 40-43.
21.
JarvisP. (1999). The practitioner researcher developing theory from practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
KemmisS.WilksonM. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In AtwehB.KemmisS.WeeksP. (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice (pp. 21-37). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
KnightJ. (2009). Coaching: The key to translating research into practice lies in continuous, job-embedded learning with ongoing support. Journal of Staff Development, 30, 18-22.
24.
LeeA.GreenG.BrennanM. (2000). Organizational knowledge, professional practice and the professional doctorate at work. In GarrickJ.RhodesC. (Eds.), Research and knowledge at work: Perspectives, case studies and innovative strategies (pp. 117–136). London: Routledge.
25.
LevinM.MartinA. W. (2007). The praxis of educating action researchers: The possibilities and obstacles in higher education. Action Research, 5, 219-229. doi:10.1177/1476750307801014
26.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project. Available from www.edschools.org
27.
LevineA. (2007). Educating researchers. New York, NY: The Education Schools Project.
28.
McKernanJ. (1988). The countenance of curriculum action research: Traditional collaborative, and emancipatory-critical conceptions. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 3, 173-200.
29.
MillerK. (2003). School, teacher, and leadership impacts on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
30.
NewmannF. M.KingM. B.YoungsP. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259-299.
31.
PerryJ. A.ImigD. G. (2008). A stewardship of practice in education. Change, November/December, 42-48.
32.
PerryJ. A. (2011). The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate: Phase II: A quest for change. UCEA Review, 53, 1-4.
33.
PerryJ. A.ImigD. G. (2008). A stewardship of practice in education. Change, 40, 42-48.
34.
ScottD.BrownA.LuntI.ThorneL. (2004). Professional doctorates: integrating professional and academic knowledge. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
35.
ScottK. W.HowellD. (2008). Clarifying analysis and interpretation in grounded theory: Using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7, 1-15.
36.
ShulmanL. S.GoldeC. M.BueschelA. C.GarabedianK. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35, 25-32. doi:10.3102/ 0013189X035003025
37.
SpeckM. (1996). Best practice in professional development for sustained educational change. ERS Spectrum, 14, 33-41.
38.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
39.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA.HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
40.
VeenmanS.DenessenE. (2001). The coaching of teachers: Results of five training studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 385-417.
41.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
ZamboD. (2011). Action research as signature pedagogy in an Education Doctorate program: The reality and hope. Innovative Higher Education, 36(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10755-010-9171-7
