In this study, we explored how a reimagined EdD supports leaders to develop the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary for effective school and district leadership. We analyzed the usefulness of inquiry-focused, equity-based participatory action research (PAR) in EdD dissertations by using case study methodology to analyze four graduates during and after the EdD program. The findings indicate participants successfully implemented PAR studies while simultaneously bolstering their leadership capacity. Findings have practical use for (1) EdD graduates as they continue to use the PAR methodology in their current work and communities and (2) leadership programs that choose to use PAR as a methodology for scholarly practitioners.
BallS. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. Metheun.
2.
BoblinS. L.IrelandS.KirkpatrickH.RobertsonK. (2013). Using Stake’s qualitative case study approach to explore implementation of evidence-based practices. Qualitative Health Journal, 23(9), 1267–1275.
3.
BrykA.GomezL.GrunowA.LeMahieuP. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.
4.
BrykA.SchneiderB. (2004). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage.
5.
BrykA. S. (2015). Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477.
6.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
7.
ChapmanL. A.JacksonA. M. (2021). Accessibility matters: Universal design and the online professional practice doctorate. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(3), 1–6.
8.
CoveyS. (1989). The seven habits of highly successful people: Powerful lessons in personal change. Simon & Schuster.
9.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. W.GuettermanT. C. (2018). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
11.
CubanL. (1988). Constancy and change in schools: 1880s to the present. In JacksonP. (Ed.), Contributions to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 85–100). McCutchan Publishing.
EisnerE. (2017). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Teachers College Press.
16.
EubanksE.ParishR.SmithD. (1997). Changing the discourse in schools. In HallP. M. (Ed.), Race, ethnicity and multiculturalism policy and practice (pp. 151–167). Garland Publishing.
17.
FreireP. (2003). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th Anniversary ed.). Continuum.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
20.
GoodenM.DantleyM. (2012). Centering race in a framework for leadership preparation. Journal of Research in Leadership Education, 7(2), 237–253.
21.
GrantM. M. (2021). Asynchronous online course designs: Articulating theory, best practices, and techniques for everyday doctoral education. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(3), 35–46.
22.
GrubbW. N. (2009). The money myth: School resources, outcomes, and equity. Russell Sage.
23.
GrubbW. N.TredwayL. (2010). Leading from the inside out: Expanded roles of teachers in equitable schools. Paradigm Press.
24.
GuajardoM.GuajardoF.JansonC.MilitelloM. (2016). Reframing community partnerships in education: Uniting the power of place and wisdom of people. Routledge.
25.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2000). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In StufflebeamD. L.MadausG. F.KellaghanT. (Eds.). Evaluation models (pp. 363–381). Kluwer Academic.
26.
GutmannA. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton University Press.
27.
HaleC. R. (2017). What is activist research?Items and Issues, 2(1), 13–19.
28.
HalversonR.HalversonE. (2019). Education as design for learning: A model for integrating education inquiry across research traditions. (WCER Working Paper No. 2019-4). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Researchhttp://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/working-papers
29.
HammondZ. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin.
30.
HerrK. G.AndersonG. (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). Sage.
31.
Hinnant-CrawfordB. (2020). Improvement science in education: A primer (improvement science in education and beyond). Myers Education Press.
32.
HunterL.EmeraldE.MartinG. (2013). Participatory activist research in the globalized world. Springer.
33.
IshimaruA. M.GallowayM. K. (2014). Beyond individual effectiveness: Conceptualizing organizational leadership for equity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(1), 93–146.
34.
KendiI. X. (2019). How to be an antiracist. Random House.
35.
KhalifaM. (2018). Culturally responsive school leadership. Harvard Education Press.
36.
KhalifaM.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311.
37.
KimT.MauldinC. (2022). Troubling unintended harm of heroic discourses in social justice leadership. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.796200
38.
LabareeD. (2008). The trouble with ed schools. Yale University Press.
39.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 65–78.
40.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
41.
LeverettL. (2002). Warriors to advance equity: A case for distributing leadership. The Mid-Atlantic Educational Laboratory.
42.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. The education schools project. The National Center for Education Statistics.
43.
LewisC. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education?Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61.
LudwigE.PrestonC. (2021). Building critical inquiry in the online EdD: Examining successes and challenges. Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(3), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.188
46.
MadorR.ZarinpoushF.Gibson-WoodH.DattadeenJ. (2019). Processes and practices for building strong collaborative research partnerships: Lessons learned from the locally-driven collaborative projects programme. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 15(4), 607–619.
47.
McKenzieK. B.ScheurichJ. J. (2004). Equity traps: A useful construct for preparing principals to lead schools that are successful with racially diverse students. Education Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 601–632.
48.
McNiffJ.LomaxP.WhiteheadJ. (1996). You and your action research project. Hyde Publications.
49.
MerriamS. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
50.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
51.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2021). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
52.
MilitelloM.TredwayL.JonesK. (2019). A reimagined Ed.D.: Participatory, progressive on-line pedagogy. In KeengweJ. (Ed.). Handbook of research on blended learning pedagogies and professional development in higher education (pp. 214–242). IGI Global.
53.
MilitelloM.TredwayL.KilloranT.PowellC.HalliganK. (2020). A reimagined doctoral program in action: Confronting equity challenges in international schools. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.). Bringing innovative practices to your school: Lessons from international schools (pp. 164–173). Routledge.
54.
MilitelloM.TredwayL.RosenthalL.WelchJ. (2021). A university as the center of change: Preparing educational activists and change leaders. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 6(1), 22–32.
55.
MorelR.CoburnC.Koehler-CattersonA.HiggsJ. (2019). The multiple meanings of scale: Implications for researchers and practitioners. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 369–377.
56.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (2nd ed.). Sage.
57.
PerryJ. A. (2013). Carnegie project on the education doctorate: The education doctorate—A degree for our time. Planning and Changing Journal, 44(3/4), 113–126.
58.
PerryJ. A. (2015). The Carnegie project on the education doctorate. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(3), 56–61.
59.
PerryJ. A.ZamboD.CrowR. (2020). The improvement science dissertation in practice: A guide for faculty, committee members, and their students. Myers Education Press.
60.
RaddS.GenerettG. G.GoodenM. A.TheoharisG. (2021). Five practices for equity-focused school leadership. Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
61.
ReasonP. (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. Sage.
62.
RigbyJ.TredwayL. (2015). Actions matter: How school leaders enact equity principles. In KhalifaM.ArnoldN. W.OsanlooA.GrantC. (Eds.), Handbook of urban educational leadership (pp. 329–348). Lanham.
SafirS.DuganJ. (2021). Street data: A next-generation model for equity, pedagogy, and school transformation. Corwin.
66.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
67.
ShieldsC. (2010). Transformative leadership: Working for equity in diverse contexts. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 46(4), 558–559.
68.
SingletonG. (2015). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide to achieving equity in schools (2nd ed.). Corwin.
69.
SnowdenD. J.BooneM. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision-making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–77.
70.
SpillaneJ. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150.
71.
SpillaneJ. P.ColdrenA. F. (2011). Diagnosis and design for school improvement. Teachers College Press.
72.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
73.
SteeleC. (2010). Whistling vivaldi: And other clues to how stereotypes affect us. W. W. Norton.
74.
TheoharisG. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve: Seven keys to equity, social justice, and school reform. Teachers College Press.
75.
TheoharisG. (2010). Disrupting injustice: Principals narrate the strategies they use to improve their schools and advance social justice. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 331–373.
76.
TredwayL.MilitelloM.MachadoM.BossetteJ. (2021). Equity matters: Witnessing the stories of students and families. In PetersonD. S.CarlisleS. P. (Eds.), Improvement science: Promoting equity in schools (pp. 51–76). Myer Education Press.
77.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
78.
YinR. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
79.
YurkofskyM.PetersonA.MehtaJ.FruminK. (2020). Research on continuous improvement: Exploring the complexities of managing educational change. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 403–433.
