This study adds to the discussion of critical consciousness development through the processes of YPAR, not as an outcome after results are shared, but through the experience of power shifting that occurs as youth become true partners in youth-led YPAR. Combining unique and boundary-pushing elements at the nexus of action research and qualitative research, this paper illustrates particular ways in which power was intentionally directed towards youth and ways in which that anti-hegemonic shift impacted all participants during the research process. We end with a challenge to our action researcher community to commit to work through the tension between external research goals and youth leadership, to ignite the transformative power that is present in the YPAR process as youth take the lead.
AndersonA. J.BaggettH. C.AndrzejewskiC. E.ForbesS. A. (2021). “Why don’t they just move closer?”: Adolescent critical consciousness development in YPAR about food security. Journal of Adolescent Research, 39(4), 861–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211065343
2.
BellJ.Sealey-RuizY. (2023). Black lives matter and the making of black educational spaces. Comparative Education Review, 67(S1), S129–S148. https://doi.org/10.1086/722217
3.
BettencourtG. (2020). Embracing problems, processes and contact zones: Using youth participatory action research to challenge adultism. Action Research, 18(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318789475
4.
CammarotaJ. (2017). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy of transformational resistance for critical youth studies. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 15(2), 188–213. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1156248
5.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (2008). Revolutionizing education youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.
6.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (2010). Youth participatory research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In Revolutionizing education (pp. 9–20). Routledge.
7.
CaraballoL.LyiscottJ. (2020). Collaborative Inquiry: Youth, Social Action, and Critical Qualitative Research. Action Research (London, England), vol. 18, no. 2, 2020, pp. 194–211, https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317752819
8.
KeddieA. (2021). The difficulties of ‘action’ in youth participatory action research: Schoolifying YPAR in two elite settings. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1696747
9.
KirshnerB.GinwrightS. (2012). Youth organizing as a developmental context for African American and latino adolescents. Child Development Perspectives, 6(3), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00243.x
10.
KornbluhM.OzerE. J.AllenC. D.KirshnerB. (2015). Youth participatory action research as an approach to sociopolitical development and the new academic standards: Considerations for educators. The Urban Review, 47(5), 868–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0337-6
11.
LemanA. M.DariotisJ. K.MarkaziD. M.KennedyZ.TracyM.ParkY. R.GriffithA. N. (2025). An interdisciplinary framework of youth participatory action research informed by curricula, youth, adults, and researchers. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 35(1), Article e13007. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13007
12.
MartinM. J.KitchelT. (2014). Barriers to participation in the national FFA organization according to urban agriculture students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.01120
13.
Milner IVH. R.SingerJ. N.ParksL.MurrayI.Lane-BondsD. (2025). Positionality as a data point in race research. Qualitative Inquiry, 31(7), 659–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241269916
14.
OzerE. J. (2017). Youth-led participatory action research: Overview and potential for enhancing adolescent development. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12228
15.
RubinB. C.Abu El-HajT. R.ClayK. (2016). Confronting the urban civic opportunity gap: Integrating youth participatory action research into teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(5), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116667195
16.
ShamrovaD. P.CummingsC. E. (2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81(10), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022
