Negative campaigning is an age-old strategy, yet its impact on trust in election outcomes remains underexplored, particularly in newer democracies. In this study, I argue that negative campaign messages erode electoral trust by fostering cynicism, undermining confidence in politicians, and heightening the perceived stakes of elections. By signalling that candidates will do whatever it takes to win, such messages raise concerns about fraud and diminish institutional trust. I further contend that these effects depend on the autonomy of electoral management bodies (EMBs). When EMB autonomy is low, greater exposure to negative campaigning significantly increases perceptions that elections are unfair. By contrast, where EMBs are highly autonomous, negative campaigning does not reduce trust in electoral integrity and may even bolster it, as institutional safeguards reassure voters. To test these claims, I draw on Afrobarometer survey data from eighteen countries across three rounds, expert assessments of negative campaign coverage from the Negative Campaigning Comparative Expert Survey, and measures of EMB autonomy from Varieties of Democracy. My findings show that the interaction between media negativity and EMB independence shapes public trust in elections, underscoring the central role of electoral institutions in mediating the democratic consequences of campaign strategies.
AdebayoJ. O.Makwambeni.B.2019. “The Limits of Peace Journalism—Media Reportage of Kenya’s 2017 General Elections.” Journal of African Elections18, no. 1: 69–85. https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2019/v18i1a4.
AggarwalM.AllenJ.CoppockA., et al2023. “A 2 Million-Person, Campaign-Wide Field Experiment Shows How Digital Advertising Affects Voter Turnout.” Nature Human Behaviour7, no. 3: 332–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01487-4.
5.
AnsolabehereS.IyengarS.SimonA.ValentinoN.1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review88, no. 4: 829–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082710.
6.
AtkesonL. R.SaundersK. L.2007. “The Effect of Election Administration on Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?” PS: Political Science & Politics40, no. 4: 655–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507071041.
7.
BailardC. S.2012. “A Field Experiment on the Internet’s Effect in an African Election: Savvier Citizens, Disaffected Voters, or Both?” Journal of Communication62, no. 2: 330–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01632.x.
8.
BailardC. S.PorterE.GrossK.2022. “Fact-Checking Trump’s Election Lies Can Improve Confidence in U.S. Elections: Experimental Evidence.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 3, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-109.
9.
BirchS.2008. “Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-National Analysis.” Electoral Studies27, no. 2: 305–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005.
10.
BisbeeJ.BrownM.LaiA.BonneauR.TuckerJ. A.NaglerJ.2022. “Election Fraud, YouTube, and Public Perception of the Legitimacy of President Biden.” Journal of Online Trust and Safety1, no. 3: Article 3. https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i3.60.
BrattonM., ed. 2013. Voting and Democratic Citizenship in Africa. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
13.
BrattonM.BhoojedhurS.2019. “Africans Want Open Elections – Especially If They Bring Change.” Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 58.
14.
BushS. S.PratherL.2022. Monitors and Meddlers: How Foreign Actors Influence Local Trust in Elections. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.
15.
CheesemanN.FisherJ.HassanI.HitchenJ.2020. “Social Media Disruption: Nigeria’s WhatsApp Politics.” Journal of Democracy31, no. 3: 145–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0037.
16.
CofféH.2017. “Citizens’ Media Use and the Accuracy of Their Perceptions of Electoral Integrity.” International Political Science Review38, no. 3: 281–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116640984.
17.
CohenM. J.SmithA. E.MoseleyM. W.LaytonM. L.2023. “Winners’ Consent? Citizen Commitment to Democracy When Illiberal Candidates Win Elections.” American Journal of Political Science67, no. 2: 261–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12690.
CoppedgeM.GerringJ.KnutsenC. H., et al. 2021. “V-Dem Dataset v11.1.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3831905. Social Science Research Network.
20.
CriglerA.JustM.BeltT.2006. “The Three Faces of Negative Campaigning: The Democratic Implications of Attack Ads, Cynical News, and Fear-Arousing Messages.” In Feeling Politics, edited by RedlawskD. P.Palgrave Macmillan US.
21.
de VreeseC. H.ElenbaasM.2008. “Media in the Game of Politics: Effects of Strategic Metacoverage on Political Cynicism.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13, no. 3: 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319650.
22.
DemarestL.KuppensL.2025. “Opportunities or Risks for Civic Education in Electoral Democracies? Evidence from Nigeria.” International Journal of Educational Development117: 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103316.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J.2004. “Do Negative Messages Work?: The Impact of Negativity on Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates.” American Politics Research32, no. 5: 570–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03260834.
25.
GalassoV.NanniciniT.NunnariS.2023. “Positive Spillovers from Negative Campaigning.” American Journal of Political Science67, no. 1: 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12610.
26.
GarnettH. A.2019. “On the Front Lines of Democracy: Perceptions of Electoral Officials and Democratic Elections.” Democratization26, no. 8: 1399–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1641797.
27.
GarnettH. A.2022. “Who Runs Elections? A Cross-National Analysis of Electoral Management Throughout the Electoral Cycle.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics60, no. 2: 146–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2022.2047482.
28.
GeerJ. G.2008. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
29.
GeerJ. G.2010. Fanning the Flames: The News Media’s Role in the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns. Shorenstein Center Discussion Paper Series 2010. D-55, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
30.
GrompingM.i ComaF. M.2015. “Electoral Integrity in Africa.” Electoral Integrity Project22.
31.
HaselmayerM.MeyerT. M.WagnerM.2019. “Fighting for Attention: Media Coverage of Negative Campaign Messages.” Party Politics25, no. 3: 412–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817724174.
32.
HickenA. D.2007. How Do Rules and Institutions Encourage Vote Buying? In Elections for sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying, editor by F. C. Schaffer. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
33.
KahnK. F.KenneyP. J.2002. “The Slant of the News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens’ Views of Candidates.” American Political Science Review96, no. 2: 381–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000230.
KerrN.LührmannA.2017. “Public Trust in Manipulated Elections: The Role of Election Administration and Media Freedom.” Electoral Studies50: 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.08.003.
36.
KrupnikovY.2014. “How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing.” Political Communication31, no. 3: 446–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.828141.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.RovnerI. B.2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” The Journal of Politics69, no. 4: 1176–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x.
39.
LuísC.JamesT. S.GarnettH. A.2024. “The Voter Experience Around the World: Lessons for Theory and Practice.” Representation60, no. 2: 367–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2024.2350418.
40.
MaierJ.NaiA.2020. “Roaring Candidates in the Spotlight: Campaign Negativity, Emotions, and Media Coverage in 107 National Elections.” The International Journal of Press/Politics25, no. 4: 576–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220919093.
41.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM.2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
42.
MareA.2025. “Media and Propaganda in Africa: Cracks, Crevices, and Continuities.” In Media and Propaganda in an Age of Disinformation, edited by T. M. Shaw. Routledge.
43.
MattesR.2014. “Popular Perceptions of Electoral Integrity in Africa.” In Advancing Electoral Integrity, edited by NorrisP.FrankR. W.ComaF. M. i. Oxford University Press.
44.
MaukM.2020. “Disentangling an Elusive Relationship: How Democratic Value Orientations Affect Political Trust in Different Regimes.” Political Research Quarterly73, no. 2: 366–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919829832.
45.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L.WeaverD. H.2014. “New Directions in Agenda-Setting Theory and Research.” Mass Communication and Society17, no. 6: 781–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.964871.
46.
NadeauR.BlaisA.1993. “Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent.” British Journal of Political Science23, no. 4: 553–63.
NaiA.WalterA.2015. “The War of Words: The Art of Negative Campaigning. Why Attack Politics Matter.” In New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning, edited by A. Nai and A. S. Walter. ECPR Press.
49.
NorrisP.2014. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge University Press.
50.
Ogwezzy-NdisikaA. O.FaustinoB. A.AmakohK. O.2018. “Curbing Hatred: The Ethnic Diehards’ Agitations and 2015 Presidential Election Campaign in Nigeria.” Journal of Hate Studies15: 233.
PerniaR. A.2022. “Authoritarian Values and Institutional Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from the Philippines.” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics7, no. 2: 204–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121992118.
RidoutT. N.SmithG. R.2008. “Free Advertising: How the Media Amplify Campaign Messages.” Political Research Quarterly61, no. 4: 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908314202.
RosasG.2010. “Trust in Elections and the Institutional Design of Electoral Authorities: Evidence from Latin America.” Electoral Studies29, no. 1: 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.09.006.
59.
SchafferF. C.2011. The Hidden Costs of Clean Election Reform. Cornell University Press.
60.
Schenck-HamlinW.ProcterD.RumseyD.2000. “The Influence of Negative Advertising Frames on Political Cynicism and Politician Accountability.” Human Communication Research26, no. 1: 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00749.x.
61.
SchuckA. R. T.2017. “Media Malaise and Political Cynicism.” In The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, edited by P. Rossler, C. Hoffner and L. van Zoonen. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
62.
SerraG.2016. “Vote Buying with Illegal Resources: Manifestation of a Weak Rule of Law in Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America8, no. 1: 129–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1600800105.
63.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D.1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. 2nd ed.Longman.
64.
StrömbäckJ.van AelstP.2010. “Exploring Some Antecedents of the Media’s Framing of Election News: A Comparison of Swedish and Belgian Election News.” The International Journal of Press/Politics15, no. 1: 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209351004.
65.
ThorsonE.OgnianovaE.CoyleJ.DentonF.2000. “Negative Political Ads and Negative Citizen Orientations Toward Politics.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising22, no. 1: 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2000.10505099.
66.
van HamC.LindbergS.2015. “When Guardians Matter Most: Exploring the Conditions Under Which Electoral Management Body Institutional Design Affects Election Integrity.” Irish Political Studies30: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2015.1099097.
67.
ZeitzoffT.2023. Nasty Politics: The Logic of Insults, Threats, and Incitement. Oxford University Press.
68.
ZelizerB.2025. “Is Propaganda by Any Other Name Still Propaganda?” In Media and Propaganda in an Age of Disinformation, edited by N. Ribeiro and B. Zelizer. Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
