The present experiment examines the effects of negative campaigns on voting participation and preference over which previous studies have provided inconsistent findings. This study focuses on the impact of negative campaigns covered in the news rather than those delivered in political advertising. Findings do not support an across-the-board “negativity-demobilization” hypothesis but demonstrate that the focus of campaign (i.e., policy-versus personality-focused) moderates the impact of campaign attacks on the likelihood of turning out to vote. While policy-based attacks covered in the news slightly stimulate voter turnout, personality attacks significantly depress one’s participatory intention. The data also indicate that negative strategies generally do not benefit the sponsoring candidates, and it is even more so when attacks concern personal matters. In general, voters appear to prefer a policy-appealing candidate over a personality-appealing one.
Allen, M., and N. Burrell. 2002. “The Negativity Effect in Political Advertising: A Meta-Analysis.”In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, ed. J.P. Dillard and M. Pfau. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Ansolabehere, S. D., and S. Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
3.
Ansolabehere, S.D., S. Iyengar, and A. Simon. 1999. “Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data.” American Political Science Review93:901-910.
4.
Ansolabehere, S. D., S. Iyengar, A. Simon, and N. Valentino. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review88(4):829-838.
5.
Brody, R.A.1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Buchanan, B.1996. Renewing Presidential Politics: Campaigns, Media, and the Public Interest. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
Burden, B.C.2002. “When Bad Press Is Good News: The Surprising Benefits of Negative Campaign Coverage.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8(3):76-89.
8.
Finkel, S.E., and J.G. Geer. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science42(2):573-595.
9.
Garramone, G.M., C.K. Atkin, B.E. Pinkleton, and R.T. Cole. 1990. “Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media34(3):299-311.
10.
Goldstein, K., and P. Freedman. 2002. “Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect.” Journal of Politics64(3):721-740.
11.
Gordon, A., D.M. Shafie, and A.C. Crigler. 2003. “Is Negative Advertising Effective for Female Candidates? An Experiment in Voters’ Uses of Gender Stereotypes.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8(3):35-53.
12.
Jamieson, K.H.1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Kahn, K. F., and P. J. Kenney. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review93(4):877-889.
14.
Kendall, K.E.2000. Communication in the Presidential Primaries: Candidates in the Media, 1912-2000. Westport, CT: Praeger.
15.
Kiousis, S., P. Bantimaroudis, and H. Ban.1999. Candidate Image Attributes: Experiments on the Substantive Dimension of Second Level Agenda Setting. Communication Research26(4):414-428.
16.
Lau, R. R., and L. Sigelman. 2000. “Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertising.” In Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, ed. J.A. Thurber, C.J. Nelson, and D.A. Dulio, 10-43. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
17.
Min, Y.2002. “Intertwining of Campaign News and Advertising: The Content and Electoral Effects of Newspaper Ad Watches.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly79(4):927-944.
18.
Patterson, T.1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.
19.
Patterson, T., and R. D. McClure. 1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York: Putnam.
20.
Rahn, W. M., and R. M. Hirshorn. 1999. “Political Advertising and Public Mood: A Study of Children’s Political Orientations.” Political Communication16(4):387-407.
21.
Roddy, B. L., and G. M. Garramone. 1988. “Appeals and Strategies of Negative Political Advertising.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media32(4):415-427.
22.
Thorson, E., W.G. Christ, and C. Caywood. 1991. “Effects of Issue-Image Strategies, Attack and Support Appeals, Music, and Visual Content in Political Commercials. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media35(4):465-486.
23.
Wattenberg, M. P., and C. L. Brians. 1999. “Negative Campaign Adverting: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?” American Political Science Review93:891-900.
24.
West, D. M.2001. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952-2000. 3rd ed.Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
