News and media web pages generate valuable consumer data, collected by third-party servers. Using longitudinal experiments, this article shows that third-party servers are active in 34 cases of European public service media (PSM) websites from 19 countries. This constitutes a pressing privacy problem in relation to GDPR and challenges the notion of PSM organizations as particularly trusted providers of media content. This has implications for their role and placement in the commercial media landscape as well as for their independency, but also for their survival in the future media landscape. Our analysis shows not only connections between the presence of advertisement and the number of third-party servers found but also a reflection of different types of European media systems. To provide a benchmark for our analysis, we also analysed 64 private media websites for the presence of third-party servers. The empirical results suggest a pressing need for discussions on whether and how PSM organizations can participate in the commercial web ecology of user data exchange and utilization, for example, for the purposes of user profiling, targeting and PSM performance measurement.
AcarGEubankCEnglehardtS, et al. (2014) The Web Never Forgets. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security - CCS’14 (eds G-JAhnMYungNLi) New York, USA, 2014, New York: ACM Press. pp. 674–689. DOI: 10.1145/2660267.2660347
2.
AcquistiATaylorCWagmanL (2016) The Economics of Privacy. Journal of Economic Literature54(2): 442–492. DOI: 10.1257/jel.54.2.44
AmooreLPiotukhV (2016) Algorith/mic Life: Calculative Devices in the Age of Big Data. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315723242
5.
BardoelJd’HaenensL (2008) Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: Prospects, promises and problems. Media, Culture & Society. 30(3): 337–355. DOI: 10.1177/0163443708088791
6.
BardoelJLoweGF (eds) (2008) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media. Göteborg: Nordicom, Göteborg Universitet.
7.
BealesH (2010) The value of behavioral targeting. Working paper for Network Advertising Initiative.
8.
BiltereystD (2004) Public service broadcasting, popular entertainment and the construction of trust. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 7(3): 341–362. DOI: 10.1177/1367549404044787
9.
BirkbakACarlsenHB (2016) The public and its algorithms: Comparing and experimenting with calculated publics. In: AmooreLPiotukhV (eds) Algorithmic Life: Calculative Devices in the Age of Big Data. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 21–34.
10.
BozdagE (2013) Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology15(3): 209–227. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6.
11.
BreyP (2005) Freedom and privacy in ambient intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology7(3): 157–166. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-006-0005-3.
BrüggemannMEngesserSBüchelF, et al. (2014) Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems. Journal of Communication64(6): 1037–1065. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12127
CoppensTSaeysF (2006) Enforcing performance: New approaches to govern public service broadcasting. Media, Culture and Society. 28(2): 261–284. DOI: 10.1177/0163443706061684
16.
DondersKMoeH (2011) Ex ante tests in Europe: From diverging perspectives to infinite conclusions. Göteborg: NORDICOM.
17.
DondersKaren (2012) Public Service Media and Policy in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
EBU Digital Strategy Group (2002) Media with a purpose - Public Service Broadcasting in the digital era. The Report of the Digital Strategy Group of the European Broadcasting Union. Geneva: EBU. Available at: http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/DSG_final_report_E_tcm6-5090.pdf (accessed 1 September 2017).
19.
EBU Media Intelligence Service (2017) Market Insights: Trust in Media.
20.
EnglehardtSNarayananA (2016) Online Tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security - CCS’16 (eds WeipplEKatzenbeisserSKruegelC, et al.), New York, USA, 2016, pp. 1388–1401. New York: ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/2976749.2978313
EvansDS (2009) The online advertising industry: Economics, evolution, and privacy. Journal of Economic Perspectives23(3): 37–60. DOI: 10.1257/jep.23.3.37.
23.
FalahrastegarMHaddadiHUhligS, et al. (2014) Anatomy of the third-party web tracking ecosystem.
24.
GerlitzCHelmondA (2013) The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society15(8): 1348–1365. DOI: 10.1177/1461444812472322.
25.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HarperT (2017) The big data public and its problems: Big data and the structural transformation of the public sphere. New Media & Society19(9): 1424–1439. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816642167
Internet Engineering Task Force (2011) RFC 6265: HTTP State Management Mechanism (“HTTP cookie”). Available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265(accessed 2 November 2017).
30.
JakubowiczK (2007) Public Service Broadcasting in the 21st Century. What Chance for a New Beginning? In: LoweGFBardoelJ (eds) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media. Kungälv: Nordicom, Göteborg Universitet. pp. 29–49.
31.
LindskowK (2016) Exploring Digital News Publishing Business Models—A Production Network Approach. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10398/9284 (accessed 1 June 2017).
32.
MoorJH (1997) Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society27(3): 27–32. DOI: 10.1145/270858.270866.
NorrisP (2009) Comparative political communications: Common frameworks or Babelian confusion?Government and Opposition44(3): 321–340. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01290.x.
RoesnerFRovillosCSaxenaA, et al. (2015) TrackingObserver: A browser-based web tracking detection platform. Available at: https://trackingobserver.cs.washington.edu(accessed 16 November 2017).
37.
SchweizerCPuppisM (2018) Public Service Media in the ‘Network’ Era A Comparison of Remits, Funding, and Debate in 17 Countries. In: LoweGFVan den BulckHDondersK (eds) Public Service Media in the Networked Society RIPE@2017. Göteborg: Nordicom, Göteborg Universitet. pp. 109–124.
SørensenJKHutchinsonJ (2018) Algorithms and Public Service Media. In: LoweGFVan den BulckHDondersK (eds) Public Service Media in the Networked Society RIPE@2017. Göteborg: Nordicom, Göteborg Universitet. pp. 91–106.
40.
TurowJ (2011) The Daily You: How The New Advertising Industry is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ThompsonPB (2001) Privacy, secrecy and security. Ethics and Information Technology3(1): 13–19. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011423705643
43.
TrappelJ (2008) Online Media Within the Public Service Realm? Reasons to Include Online into the Public Service Mission. Convergence14(3): 313–322. DOI: 10.1177/1354856508091083
44.
Van den BulckH (2001) Public service television and national identity as a project of modernity: the example of Flemish television. Media, Culture & Society23(1): 53–69. DOI: 10.1177/016344301023001003
45.
Van den BulckHMoeH (2017) Public service media, universality and personalisation through algorithms: Mapping strategies and exploring dilemmas. Media, Culture & Society. DOI: 10.1177/0163443717734407
46.
VedderA (1999) KDD: The challenge to individualism. Ethics and Information Technology1(4): 275–281. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010016102284
47.
WambachTBräunlichK (2017) The evolution of third-party web tracking. In: Information Systems Security and Privacy. ICISSP 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Rome, Italy, 19-21 February 2016, Vol. 691, pp. 130–147. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54433-5_8
