Scholars have long argued that incidental news exposure (INE) is a potentially valuable way citizens gain political information and learn about current affairs. Yet growing scholarship on news avoidance suggests many people still manage to consume little news, and algorithmic curation may decrease the likelihood that they will be exposed to it incidentally. In this article, we put the literatures on INE, news avoidance, and political talk into dialogue with one another. Then, by inductively analyzing over a hundred in-depth interviews conducted from 2016 to 2020 with news avoiders in the UK, Spain, and the United States, we explore how they encounter news incidentally and to what extent they feel the news is accessible and available to them. Our audience-centric approach highlights that interviewees often did not make a clear distinction between direct encounters with professional news (“firsthand news”) and discussions of news (“secondhand news”), especially online. When they did make a distinction, the latter was often more salient for them. We also find that just as news consumers have repertoires of news sources on which they habitually rely, news avoiders have repertoires of sources for incidental exposure to news to stay informed about major events and anything that might affect them directly. And yet, those repertoires catch only the biggest and most sensational stories of the day and do little to help them contextualize or understand the news they encounter, contributing to their sense that news is neither entirely absent nor ambient in the way scholars have theorized.
AnspachN. M.2017. “The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read.” Political Communication37(4):590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1316329.
2.
Ardèvol-AbreuA.DiehlT.Gil De ZúñigaH.. 2017. “Antecedents of Internal Political Efficacy: Incidental News Exposure Online and the Mediating Role of Political Discussion.” Politics39(1):82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717693251.
3.
BetakovaD.BoomgaardenH.LechelerS.SchäferS.AalderingL.. 2021. “I Do Not (Want to) Know! An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Unintentional and Intentional News Avoidance and Their Predictors.” International Journal of Press/Politics Annual Conference. Virtual Conference.
4.
BlumlerJ. G.McQuailD.. 1968. Television in Politics: Its Uses and Influence. London: Faber and Faber.
5.
BoczkowskiP.MitchelsteinE.MatassiM.. 2018. ““News Comes Across When I’m in a Moment of Leisure”: Understanding the Practices of Incidental News Consumption on Social Media.” New Media & Society20(10):3523–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817750396.
BradshawS.HowardP.. 2019. Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Oxford: University of Oxford.
8.
BrüggemannM.EngesserS.BüchelF.HumprechtE.CastroL.. 2014. “Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems.” Journal of Communication64(6):1037–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127.
9.
CarlsonT. 2018. “Modeling Political Information Transmission as a Game of Telephone.” The Journal of Politics80(1):348–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/694767
10.
CarlsonT.2019. “Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication.” American Political Science Association113(2):325–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541900008X.
DownsA.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
13.
DruckmanJ. N.LevenduskyM. S.McLainA.. 2018. “No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions.” American Journal of Political Science62(1):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12325.
14.
EdgerlyS.2017. “Seeking out and Avoiding the News Media: Young Adults’ Proposed Strategies for Obtaining Current Events Information.” Mass Communication and Society20(3):358–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1262424.
15.
EdgerlyS.2021. “The Head and Heart of News Avoidance: How Attitudes About the News Media Relate to Levels of News Consumption.” Journalism1(18):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211012922.
16.
EsserF.2013. “The Emerging Paradigm of Comparative Communication Enquiry.” International Journal of Communication7:113–28. https:/doi.org/10.5167/uzh-91247.
17.
EvelandW. P.MoreyA. C.HutchensM. J.. 2011. “Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation From A Communication Perspective.” Journal of Communication61(6):1082–103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x.
18.
GeersS. 2020. “News Consumption Across Media Platforms and Content: A Typology of Young News Users.” Public Opinion Quarterly84(S1): 332–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa010.
19.
Gil de ZúñigaH.WeeksB.Ardèvol-AbreuA.. 2017. “Effects of the News-Finds-me Perception in Communication: Social Media Use Implications for News Seeking and Learning About Politics.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(3):105–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12185
20.
HargreavesI.2003. Journalism: Truth or Dare?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HindmanM.2018. The Internet Trap. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
KaiserJ.KellerT. R.Kleinen-von KöniglsöwK.. 2021. “Incidental News Exposure on Facebook as a Social Experience: The Influence of Recommender and Media Cues on News Selection.” Communication Research48(1):77–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218803529.
KarnowskiV.KümpelA. S.LeonhardL.LeinerD. J.. 2017. “From Incidental News Exposure to News Engagement: How Perceptions of the News Post and News Usage Patterns Influence Engagement with News Articles Encountered on Facebook.” Computers in Human Behavior76:42–50. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.041.
27.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP.. 1955. Personal Influence. NewYork: The Free Press.
28.
KimY.ChenS.Gil de ZúñigaH.. 2013. “Stumbling upon News on the Internet: The Effect of Incidental News Exposure and Relative Entertainment Use on Political Participation.” Computers in Human Behavior29(6):2607–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005.
29.
KrugmanH.HartleyE. L.. 1970. “Passive Learning Through Television.” Public Opinion Quarterly34(2):184–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/267788.
30.
KsiazekT. B.MalthouseE. C.WebsterJ. G.. 2010. “News-seekers and Avoiders: Exploring Patterns of Total News Consumption Across media and the Relationship to Civic Participation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media54(4):551–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2010.519808.
31.
KümpelA. S.2020. “Matthew Effect in Social Media News Use: Assessing Inequalities in News Exposure and News Engagement on Social Network Sites.” Journalism21(8):1083–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915374.
32.
LechelerS.de VreeseC. H.. 2017. “News media, Knowledge, and Political Interest: Evidence of a Dual Role from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Communication67(4):545–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12314.
33.
LeeJ. K.KimE.. 2017. “Incidental Exposure to News: Predictors in the Social Media Setting and Effects on Information Gain Online.” Computers in Human Behavior75:1008–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.018.
34.
LukerK.2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
LupiaArthurMcCubbinsMathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MarcinkowskiF.DošenovićP.. 2021. “From Incidental Exposure to Intentional Avoidance: Psychological Reactance to Political Communication During the 2017 German National Election Campaign.” New Media & Society23(3):457–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820902104.
37.
MitchelsteinE.BoczkowskiP.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.HayashiK.VilliM.Kligler-VilenchikN.. 2020. “Incidentality on Continuum: A Comparative Conceptualization of Incidental News Consumption.” Journalism21(8):1136–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915355.
38.
MoussaïdM.BrightonH.GaissmaierW.. 2015. “The Amplification of Risk in Experimental Diffusion Chains.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(18):5631–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421883112.
39.
MutzD. C.MartinP. S.. 2001. “Facilitating Communication Across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media.” American Political Science Review95(1):97–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000223.
40.
NanzA.MatthesJ.. 2022. “Democratic Consequences of Incidental Exposure to Political Information: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 72(3): 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac008.
41.
NewmanN.FletcherR.KalogeropoulosA.LevyD.NielsenR. K.. 2017. Digital News Report. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism website: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital News Report 2017 web_0.pdf.
NorrisP.2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Oeldorf-HirschA.2018. “The Role of Engagement in Learning from Active and Incidental News Exposure on Social Media.” Mass Communication and Society21(2): 225–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022.
45.
PalmerR.ToffB.. 2020. “What Does It Take to Sustain a News Habit: The Role of Civic Duty Norms and a Connection to a 'News Community' among News Avoiders in the UK and Spain.” International Journal of Communication14. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12252
46.
PalmerR.ToffB.. 2022. “Defining News Avoidance: The Importance of Overall News Consumption and Attention.” [paper presentation]. International Communication Association Conference. Paris, France.
47.
ParkC. S.2019. “Does Too Much News on Social Media Discourage News Seeking?” Social Media + Society5(3):1–12.
48.
PriorM.2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy. How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. NY: Cambridge University Press.
SchudsonM.1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Martin Kessler Books.
51.
SkovsgaardM.AndersenK.. 2020. “Conceptualizing News Avoidance: Towards a Shared Understanding of Different Causes and Potential Solutions.” Journalism Studies21(4):459–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410.
52.
SongH.JungJ.KimY.. 2016. “Perceived News Overload and its Cognitive and Attitudinal Consequences for News Usage in South Korea.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly94(4):1172–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679975.
53.
StrömbäckJ.2017. “News Seekers, News Avoiders, and the Mobilizing Effects of Election Campaigns: Comparing Election Campaigns for the National and the European Parliaments.” International Journal of Communication11:237–58. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5919.
54.
StrömbäckJ.ShehataA.. 2010. “Media Malaise or a Virtuous Circle? Exploring the Causal Relationships Between News Media Exposure, Political News Attention and Political Interest.” European Journal of Political Research49(5):575–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x.
55.
SwartJ.PetersC.BroersmaM.. 2017. “Repositioning News and Public Connection in Everyday Life: A User-Oriented Perspective on Inclusiveness, Engagement, Relevance, and Constructiveness.” Media, Culture & Society39(6):902–18. doi:10.1177/0163443716679034.
56.
ThorsonK.2020. “Attracting the News: Algorithms, Platforms, and Reframing Incidental Exposure.” Journalism21(8):1067–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915352.
57.
ThorsonK.WellsC.. 2016. “Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age.” Communication Theory26(3):309–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087.
58.
ThorsonK.XuY.EdgerlyS.. 2018. “Political Inequalities Start at Home: Parents, Children, and the Socialization of Civic Infrastructure Online.” Political Communication35(2):178–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1333550.
ToffB.KalogeropoulosA.. 2020. “All the News That’s Fit to Ignore: How the Information Environment Does and Does Not Shape News Avoidance.” Public Opinion Quarterly84(S1):366–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016.
61.
ToffB.NielsenR. K.. 2018. “‘I Just Google It’: Folk Theories of Distributed Discovery.” Journal of Communication68(3):636–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy009.
62.
ToffB.PalmerR.. 2019. “Explaining the Gender Gap in News Avoidance: “News- Is-for-Men” Perceptions and the Burdens of Caretaking.” Journalism Studies20(11):1563–79. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528882.
63.
ValenzuelaS.BachmannI.BargstedM.. 2019. “The Personal Is the Political? What Do WhatsApp Users Share and How It Matters for News Knowledge, Polarization and Participation in Chile.” Digital Journalism9(2):155–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1693904.
64.
ValerianiA.VaccariC.. 2016. “Accidental Exposure to Politics on Social Media as Online Participation Equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.” New Media & Society18(9):1857–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616223.
65.
ValerianiA.VaccariC.. 2018. “Political Talk on Mobile Instant Messaging Services: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK.” Information, Communication & Society21(11):1715–31. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1350730.
66.
VilliM.AharoniT.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.BoczkowskiP.HayashiK.MitchelsteinE.TanakaA.Kligler-VilenchikN.. 2021. “Taking a Break from News: A Five-Nation Study of News Avoidance in the Digital era.” Digital Journalism10(1):148–64. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1904266.
67.
YadamsurenB.ErdelezS.. 2017. Incidental Exposure to Online News. Chapel Hill, NC: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
68.
YamamotoM.KushinM.DalisayF.. 2018. “How Informed Are Messaging App Users About Politics? A Linkage of Messaging App Use and Political Knowledge and Participation.” Telematics and Informatics35(8):2376–86. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.008.
69.
ZallerJ.2003. “A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen.” Political Communication20(2):109–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211136.
70.
ZukinC.SnyderR.. 1984. “Passive Learning: When the Media Environment is the Message.” Public Opinion Quarterly48(3): 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1086/268864.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
