When citizens perceive news coverage as ideologically slanted, their crucial trust in the (traditional) news media decreases. Research on the so-called hostile media phenomenon indeed shows that an alarming number of people consider news coverage as disadvantaging their own political preferences and favoring opposing (partisan) views. However, most of this research is conducted in an experimental setting, and we do not know how this works in the real world, where citizens predominantly consume news from media outlets they trust and perceive as ideologically like-minded. By questioning Belgian citizens about their perceptions of partisan bias in their preferred news outlet, this study shows that the hostile media phenomenon also holds in a least likely context; even content produced by “friendly” news sources is seen as ideologically slanted, potentially contributing to citizens’ general distrust in the news media. Moreover, we find that especially right-wing citizens and strong partisans believe their news outlet disadvantages their preferred party.
AalbergT.CurranJ., eds. 2012. How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. Vol. 1. London: Routledge.
2.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM.MurphyC.2012. “Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure.”The Journal of Politics74 (1): 174–86.10.1017/S002238161100123X
ArpanL. M.RaneyA. A.2003. “An Experimental Investigation of News Source and the Hostile Media Effect.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80 (2): 265–81.10.1177/107769900308000203
5.
BarnidgeM.GuntherA. C.KimJ.HongY.PerrymanM.TayS. K.KniselyS.2020. “Politically Motivated Selective Exposure and Perceived Media Bias.”Communication Research47 (1): 82–103.10.1177/0093650217713066
6.
BaumM. A.GussinP.2008. “In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the Media.”Quarterly Journal of Political Science3 (1): 1–31.10.1561/100.00007010
7.
ChristiansC. G.GlasserT.McQuailD.NordenstrengK.WhiteR. A.2010. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
8.
CoeK.TewksburyD.BondB. J.DrogosK. L.PorterR. W.YahnA.ZhangY.2008. “Hostile News: Partisan Use and Perceptions of Cable News Programming.”Journal of Communication58 (2): 201–19.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
9.
CovertT. J. A.WasburnP. C.2007. “Measuring Media Bias: A Content Analysis of Time and Newsweek Coverage of Domestic Social Issues, 1975–2000.”Social Science Quarterly88 (3): 690–706.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00478.x
10.
D’AlessioD.AllenM.2000. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-Analysis.”Journal of Communication50 (4): 133–56.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02866.x
11.
DaltonR. J.BeckP. A.HuckfeldtR.1998. “Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election.”American Political Science Review92 (1): 111–26.10.2307/2585932
12.
De BensE.RaeymaeckersK.2010. De pers in België [The press in Belgium]. Leuven: Lannoo.
13.
Djerf-PierreM.WeibullL.2008. “From Public Educator to Interpreting Ombudsman.” In Communicating Politics, edited by StrömbäckJ.ØrstenM.AalbergT.195–214. Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
14.
DomkeD.WattsM. D.ShahD. V.FanD. P.1999. “The Politics of Conservative Elites and the ‘Liberal Media’ Argument.”Journal of Communication49 (4): 35–58.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.x
15.
EberlJ.-M.2019. “Lying Press: Three Levels of Perceived Media Bias and Their Relationship with Political Preferences.”Communications44 (1): 5–32.10.1515/commun-2018-0002
EvelandW. P.Jr.ShahD. V.2003. “The Impact of Individual and Interpersonal Factors on Perceived News Media Bias.”Political Psychology24 (1): 101–17.10.1111/0162-895X.00318
18.
FeldmanL.2011. “Partisan Differences in Opinionated News Perceptions: A Test of the Hostile Media Effect.”Political Behavior33 (3): 407–32.10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
19.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from US Daily Newspapers.”Econometrica78 (1): 35–71.10.3982/ECTA7195
20.
GoldmanS. K.MutzD. C.2011. “The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure.”Political Communication28 (1): 42–66.10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
21.
GuntherA. C.1988. “Attitude Extremity and Trust in Media.”Journalism Quarterly65 (2): 279–87.10.1177/107769908806500203
22.
GuntherA. C.1992. “Biased Press or Biased Public? Attitudes toward Media Coverage of Social Groups.”Public Opinion Quarterly56 (2): 147–67.10.1086/269308
23.
GuntherA. C.SchmittK.2004. “Mapping Boundaries of the Hostile Media Effect.”Journal of Communication54 (1): 55–70.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
24.
HallinD. C.ManciniP.2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HansenG. J.KimH.2011. “Is the Media Biased against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research.”Communication Research Reports28 (2): 169–79.10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
26.
HartonH. C.LataneB.1997. “Information- and Thought-Induced Polarization: The Mediating Role of Involvement in Making Attitudes Extreme.”Journal of Social Behavior and Personality12 (2): 271–99.
27.
IyengarS.HahnK. S.2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.”Journal of Communication59 (1): 19–39.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
28.
JonesD. A.2004. “Why Americans Don’t Trust the Media: A Preliminary Analysis.”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics9 (2): 60–75.10.1177/1081180X04263461
29.
LaddJ. M.2012. Why Americans Hate the News Media and How It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30.
LeeT.-T.2005. “The Liberal Media Myth Revisited: An Examination of Factors Influencing Perceptions of Media Bias.”Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49 (1): 43–64.10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
31.
LiebesT.RibakR.1991. “Democracy at Risk: The Reflection of Political Alienation in Attitudes toward the Media.”Communication Theory1 (3): 239–52.10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00017.x
32.
LiuJ. H.LatanéB.1998. “The Catastrophic Link between the Importance and Extremity of Political Attitudes.”Political Behavior20 (2): 105–26.10.1023/A:1024828729174
33.
McQuailD.1992. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. Vol. 144. London: Sage.
34.
MondakJ. J.AndersonM. R.2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.”The Journal of Politics66 (2): 492–512.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00161.x
NivenD.2003. “Objective Evidence on Media Bias: Newspaper Coverage of Congressional Party Switchers.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80 (2): 311–26.10.1177/107769900308000206
37.
PerloffR. M.1989. “Ego-Involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage.”Communication Research16 (2): 236–62.10.1177/009365089016002004
38.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.2012. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
ReidS. A.2012. “A Self-Categorization Explanation for the Hostile Media Effect.”Journal of Communication62 (3): 381–99.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
41.
RyanM.2001. “Journalistic Ethics, Objectivity, Existential Journalism, Standpoint Epistemology, and Public Journalism.”Journal of Mass Media Ethics16 (1): 3–22.10.1207/S15327728JMME1601_2
42.
ShahD. V.McLeodD. M.RojasH.ChoJ.WagnerM. W.FriedlandL. A.2017. “Revising the Communication Mediation Model for a New Political Communication Ecology.”Human Communication Research43 (4): 491–504.10.1111/hcre.12115
43.
TsfatiY.CohenJ.2005. “Democratic Consequences of Hostile Media Perceptions: The Case of Gaza Settlers.”The International Journal of Press/Politics10 (4): 28–51.
44.
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R.1985. “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49 (3): 577–585.10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
45.
Van AelstP. 2007. Toeschouwer, speler of scheidsrechter? Een studie naar de rol van de media in de verkiezingscampagne van 2003 [Spectator, player or referee. A study on the role of the media in the 2003 election campaign]. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
46.
Van der MeerT. W.Van ElsasE.LubbeR.Van der BrugW.2015. “Are Volatile Voters Erratic, Whimsical or Seriously Picky? A Panel Study of 58 Waves into the Nature of Electoral Volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010).”Party Politics21 (1): 100–14.10.1177/1354068812472570
47.
WattsM. D.DomkeD.ShahD. V.FanD. P.1999. “Elite Cues and Media Bias in Presidential Campaigns: Explaining Public Perceptions of a Liberal Press.”Communication Research26 (2): 144–75.10.1177/009365099026002003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
