This study examines selective exposure and trust during uprisings. It studies major uses of traditional and social media and assesses the public’s trust in these media and their engagement in sharing news. Focusing on the October 2019 Lebanon uprising, the research surveys thousand Lebanese individuals using a nationally representative probability sample. The findings provide support for selective exposure theory beyond the Western context, particularly for people undergoing stressful political change. The findings also provide support to the robustness of issue publics as a theoretical construct that predicts selective exposure to pro-attitudinal news content, as well as support for attitude strength and attitude importance as two separate predictors.
ArugueteN.CalvoE.2018. “Time to #Protest: Selective Exposure, Cascading Activation, and Framing in Social Media.” Journal of Communication68 (3): 480–502. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy007.
BeamM.HutchensM.HmielowskiJ.2018. “Facebook News and (De)polarization: Reinforcing Spirals in the 2016 US Election.” Information, Communication & Society21 (7): 940–58. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1444783.
5.
Bou-HamadI.YehyaN.2020. “Partisan Selective Exposure in TV Consumption Patterns: A Polarized Developing Country Context.” Communication Research47 (1): 55–81. doi:10.1177/0093650216681896.
6.
BrannonL.TaglerM.EaglyA.2007. “The Moderating Role of Attitude Strength in Selective Exposure to Information.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43 (4): 611–17. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.001.
ConverseP. E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. DA Apter, 206–261. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
DahlgrenP.ShehataA.StrömbäckJ.2019. “Reinforcing Spirals at Work? Mutual Influences Between Selective News Exposure and Ideological Leaning.” European Journal of Communication34 (2): 159–74. doi:10.1177/0267323119830056.
DotanJ.CohenA.1976. “Mass Media Use in the Family during War and Peace.” Communication Research3 (4): 393–402. doi:10.1177/009365027600300403.
12.
DylkoI.DolgovI.HoffmanW.EckhartN.MolinaM.AazizO.2018. “Impact of Customizability Technology on Political Polarization.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics15 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1354243.
13.
FeldmanL.HartP.2018. “Broadening Exposure to Climate Change News? How Framing and Political Orientation Interact to Influence Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication68 (3): 503–24. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy011.
14.
FestingerL.1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. doi:10.2307/1420234.
15.
FestingerL.1964. Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance. 3rd Edition.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16.
GarrettR.2009. “Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate.” Journal of Communication59 (4): 676–99. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x.
17.
GeorgiouM.2012. “Seeking Ontological Security beyond the Nation.” Television & New Media14 (4): 304–21. doi:10.1177/1527476412463448.
18.
HameleersM.van der MeerT.2019. “Fight or Flight? Attributing Responsibility in Response to Mixed Congruent and Incongruent Partisan News in Selective Exposure Media Environments.” Information, Communication & Society23:1327–1352. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1566394.
19.
HartW.AlbarracínD.EaglyA.BrechanI.LindbergM.MerrillL.2009. “Feeling Validated Versus Being Correct: A Meta-Analysis of Selective Exposure to Information.” Psychological Bulletin135 (4): 555–88. doi:10.1037/a0015701.
20.
IyengarS.HahnK. S.KrosnickJ. A.WalkerJ.2008. “Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership.”Journal of Politics70:186–200. doi:10.1017/S0022381607080139.
21.
JackobN.2010. “No Alternatives? The Relationship between Perceived Media Dependency, Use of Alternative Information Sources, and General Trust in Mass Media.” International Journal of Communication4:589–606. doi:1932–8036/20100589.
22.
JahngM.2018. “From Reading Comments to Seeking News: Exposure to Disagreements From Online Comments and the Need For Opinion-Challenging News.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics15 (2): 142–54. doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1449702.
23.
JohnsonT.KayeB.2013. “The Dark Side of the Boon? Credibility, Selective Exposure and the Proliferation of Online Sources of Political Information.” Computers in Human Behavior29 (4): 1862–71. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.011.
24.
JonesD. A.2004. “Why Americans Don’t Trust the Media: A Preliminary Analysis.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics9 (2): 60–75.
25.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.CarpentierF.BlumhoffA.NickelN.2005. “Selective Exposure Effects for Positive and Negative News: Testing the Robustness of the Informational Utility Model.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly82 (1): 181–95. doi:10.1177/107769900508200112.
26.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.JohnsonB.WesterwickA.2015. “Confirmation Bias in Online Searches: Impacts of Selective Exposure before an Election on Political Attitude Strength and Shifts.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20 (2): 171–87. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12105.
27.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.LiuL.HinoA.WesterwickA.JohnsonB.2019. “Context Impacts on Confirmation Bias: Evidence from the 2017 Japanese Snap Election Compared with American and German Findings.” Human Communication Research45:427–49. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz005.
28.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MengJ.2009. “Looking the Other Way: Selective Exposure to Attitude-Consistent and Counter-Attitudinal Political Information.” Communication Research36 (2): 426–48. doi:10.1177/0093650209333030.
29.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MothesC.PolavinN.2020. “Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information.” Communication Research47 (1): 104–24. doi:10.1177/0093650217719596.
30.
KozmanC.MelkiJ.2018. “News Media Uses during War: The Case of the Syrian Conflict.” Journalism Studies19 (10): 1466–88. doi:10.1080/1461670x.2017.1279564.
LeeF. L. F.2010a. “The Perceptual Bases of Collective Efficacy and Protest Participation: The Case of Pro-Democracy Protests in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research22 (3): 392–411.10.1093/ijpor/edq023
33.
LeeT. T.2010b. “Why They Don’t Trust the Media: An Examination of Factors Predicting Trust.” American Behavioral Scientist54 (1): 8–21.10.1177/0002764210376308
34.
LeeP. S. N.SoC. Y. K.LeungL.2015. “Social Media and Umbrella Movement: Insurgent Public Sphere in Formation.” Chinese Journal of Communication8 (4): 356–75.
35.
Lev-OnA.2011. “Communication, Community, Crisis: Mapping Uses and Gratifications in the Contemporary Media Environment.” New Media & Society14 (1): 98–116. doi:10.1177/1461444811410401.
36.
LiangH.2018. “broadcast versus Viral Spreading: The Structure of Diffusion Cascades and Selective Sharing on Social Media.” Journal of Communication68 (3): 525–46. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy006.
37.
LteifD.2019. “The Lebanon Revolution Takes on the Media: A Resource on Alternative News Outlets.” Jadaliyya, December23. https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/40379.
38.
LuY.LeeJ.2018. “Partisan Information Sources and Affective Polarization: Panel Analysis of the Mediating Role of Anger and Fear.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96 (3): 767–83. doi:10.1177/1077699018811295.
39.
MelkiJ.2014. “The Interplay of Politics, Economics and Culture in News Framing of Middle East Wars.” Media, War & Conflict7 (2): 165–86. doi:10.1177/1750635214537405.
40.
MelkiJ.KozmanC.2019. “Media Dependency, Selective Exposure and Trust during War: Media Sources and Information Needs of Displaced and Non-Displaced Syrians.” Media, War & Conflict. Published electronically July 10. doi:10.1177/1750635219861907.
41.
MetzgerM.HartsellE.FlanaginA.2020. “Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News.” Communication Research47 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1177/0093650215613136.
42.
PeraltaC.WojcieszakM.LelkesY.VreeseC.2017. “Selective Exposure to Balanced Content and Evidence Type: The Case of Issue and Non-Issue Publics about Climate Change and Health Care.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94 (3): 833–61. doi:10.1177/1077699016654681.
43.
SearsD.FreedmanJ.1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” Public Opinion Quarterly31 (2): 194–213. doi:10.1086/267513.
44.
SongH.ChoJ.BenefieldG.2020. “The Dynamics of Message Selection in Online Political Discussion Forums: Self-Segregation or Diverse Exposure?”Communication Research47 (1): 125–52. doi:10.1177/0093650218790144.
StroudN.2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior30 (3): 341–66. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9.
47.
StroudN.2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication60 (3): 556–76. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x.
48.
StroudN.LeeJ.2013. “Perceptions of Cable News Credibility.” Mass Communication and Society16 (1): 67–88. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.646449.
ThomasC.BourdeauA.TaglerM.2018. “Interhemispheric Communication and the Preference for Attitude Consistent Information.” Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition24 (3): 342–54. doi:10.1080/1357650x.2018.1520860.
52.
TsfatiY.2003. “Media Skepticism and Climate of Opinion Perception.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research15 (1): 65–82. doi:10.1093/ijpor/15.1.65.
53.
TsfatiY.ArielyG.2014. “Individual and Contextual Correlates of Trust in Media across 44 Countries.” Communication Research41 (6): 760–82. doi:10.1177/0093650213485972.
54.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ.2003. “Do People Watch What They Do Not Trust?.” Communication Research30 (5): 504–29. doi:10.1177/0093650203253371.
55.
TufekciZ.WilsonC.2012. “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication62 (2): 363–79. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x.
56.
ValenzuelaS.ArriagadaA.SchermanA.2012. “The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile.” Journal of Communication62 (2): 299–314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x.
57.
VelasquezA.LaRoseR.2015. “Youth Collective Activism through Social Media: The Role of Collective Efficacy.” New Media & Society17 (6): 899–918.10.1177/1461444813518391
58.
WesterwickA.KleinmanS.Knobloch-WesterwickS.2013. “Turn a Blind Eye If You Care: Impacts of Attitude Consistency, Importance, and Credibility on Seeking of Political Information and Implications for Attitudes.” Journal of Communication63 (3): 432–53. doi:10.1111/jcom.12028.
59.
WojcieszakM.2019. “What Predicts Selective Exposure Online: Testing Political Attitudes, Credibility, and Social Identity.” Communication Research. Published electronically May 20. doi:10.1177/0093650219844868.
60.
YeeV.SaadH.2019. “To Make Sense of Lebanon’s Protests, Follow the Garbage.” The New York Times, December3. doi:nyti.ms/2DCMtZD.
61.
ZhuQ.SkoricM.ShenF.2017. “I Shield Myself from Thee: Selective Avoidance on Social Media during Political Protests.” Political Communication34 (1): 112–31. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471.
