This study proposes a “media momentum model,” arguing that the amount of news coverage candidates receive might influence their candidacy potency and duration. The two mechanisms that drive this process are rational choice on the candidates' side and cue taking on the voters' side. Based on data from the primary elections in the past two decades, this study shows that media coverage frequency of presidential candidates during and before their “exhibition season” has significant impact on the length of time they stay in the race before withdrawing from the campaign. Given the notion that choice is at the core of democracy, continued scholarly attention should be paid to the unique explanatory power of media coverage in elections.
Adams, W.C.1987. "As New Hampshire Goes . . ." In Media and Momentum:The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. G.R. Orren and N.W. Polsby, 42-59. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
2.
Adkins, R.E., and A.J. Dowdle.2000. "Break Out the Mint Juleps in New Hampshire? Is New Hampshire the `Primary' Culprit Limiting Presidential Nomination Forecasts? " American Politics Quarterly28:251-69.
3.
Aldrich, J.1980. "A Dynamic Model of Presidential Nomination Campaigns ." The American Political Science Review74(3):651-69.
4.
Alger, D.1996. The Media and Politics. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth.
5.
Arterton, F.C.1978a. "Campaign Organizations Confront the Media-Political Environment." In Race for the Presidency, ed. J.D. Barber, 3-24. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Arterton, F.C.1978b. "The Media Politics of Presidential Campaigns: A Study of the Carter Nomination Drive." In Race for the Presidency , ed. J.D. Barber, 25-54. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Bagdikian, B.H.2000. The Media Monopoly. 6th Edition. Boston: Beacon.
8.
Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny.1986. "The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations ." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51:1173-82.
9.
Bartels, L.M.1985. "Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns." The American Political Science Review79(3):804-15.
10.
Bartels, L.M.1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Bartels, L.M.1989. "After Iowa: Momentum in Presidential Primaries." In The Iowa Caucuses and the Presidential Nominating Process, ed. P. Squire, 121-48. Boulder, CO: Westview.
12.
Becker, G.S.1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., and B.S. Jones.1997. "Time is of the Essence: Event History Model in Political Science." American Journal of Political Science41:1414-61.
14.
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., and B.S. Jones.2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Brady, H.E., and R. Johnston.1987. "What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?" In Media and Momentum: New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. G.R. Orren and N.W. Polsby, 127-86. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
16.
Campbell, J.E., J.R. Alford, and K. Henry.1984. "Television Markets and Congressional Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly9:665-78.
17.
Cantor, N., and W. Mischel.1979. "Prototypes in Person Perception." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 12, ed. L. Berkowitz, 3-52. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Carson, J.L., E.J. Engstrom, and J.M. Roberts.2007. "Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and Incumbency Advantage in Congress."American Political Science Review101(2):289-301.
19.
Cook, T.E.1989. Making Laws and Making News: Media Strategies in the U.S . House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
20.
Curran, J.1991. "Mass Media and Democracy: A Reappraisal." In Mass Media and Society, ed. J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, 82-117. New York: Edward Arnold.
21.
Dahl, R.A.1989. Democracy and Its Critiques. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
22.
Delli Carpini, M.X., and S. Keeter.1996. What Americans Know about Politics andWhy It Matters. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
23.
Downs, A.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
24.
Flowers, J.F., A.A. Haynes, and M.H. Crespin.2003. "The Media, the Campaign, and the Message."American Journal of Political Science47(2):259-73.
25.
Gamson, W.A., and A. Modigliani.1989. "Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach." American Journal of Sociology95(1):1-37.
26.
Gelman, A., and G. King.1990. "Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias." American Journal of Political Science34:1142-64.
27.
Gitlin, T.1980. The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley : SAGE Publications.
28.
Goldstein, J.H.1978. "The Influence of Money in the Pre-nomination Stage of the Presidential Selection Process: The Case of the 1976 Election." Presidential Studies Quarterly8:164-79.
29.
Grush, J.E.1980. "Impact of Candidate Expenditures, Regionality, and Prior Outcomes on the 1976 Democratic Presidential Primaries." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38:337-47.
30.
Gurian, P-H.1993a. "Candidate Behavior in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: A Dynamic Model." Journal of Politics55(1):115-40.
31.
Gurian, P-H.1993b. "Primaries vs. Caucuses: Strategic Considerations of Presidential Candidates." Social Science Quarterly74:310-21.
32.
Hallin, D.C., and P. Mancini.2004. Comparing Media Systems:Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Higgins, E.T., W.S. Rholes, and C.R. Jones.1977. "Category Accessibility and Impression Formation." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology13:141-54.
34.
Holbert, R.L., and M.T. Stephenson .2003. "The Importance of Indirect Effects in Media Effects Research: Testing for Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media47(4):556-72.
35.
Iyengar, S., and J.A. McGrady.2007. Media Politics:A Citizen's Guide. New York: Norton.
36.
Jacobson, G.C.1992. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 3rd Edition. New York: HarperCollins.
37.
Jerit, J., and J. Barabas, 2006. "Bankrupt Rhetoric: How Misleading Information Affects Knowledge about Social Security." Public Opinion Quarterly70(3):278-303.
38.
Keeter, S., and C. Zukin.1983. Uninformed Choice:The Failure of the New Presidential Nominating System. New York: Praeger.
39.
Kenney, P.J., and T.W. Rice.1994. "The Psychology of Political Momentum ." Political Research Quarterly47(4):923-38.
40.
Kiousis, S., and M. McCombs.2004. "Agenda-setting Effects and Attitude Strength."Communication Research31(1):36-57.
41.
Lenart, S.1997. "Naming Names in a Midwestern Town: The Salience of Democratic Presidential Hopefuls in Early 1992." Political Behavior19(4):365-82.
42.
Manin, B.1997. The Principles of Representative Government. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Matthews, D.R.1978. "`Winnowing': The News Media and the 1976 Presidential Nominations." In Race for the Presidency, ed. J. D. Barber, 55-78. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
Mayer, W.G.1996. "Forecasting Nominations." In In Pursuit of the White House: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees, ed. W.G. Mayer, 44-71. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
45.
Meyrowitz, J.1992. "The Press Rejects a Candidate."Columbia Journalism Review (March/April). http://backissues.cjrarchives.org/year/92/2/opinion.asp (accessed July 24, 2008).
46.
McComb, M.E., and D.L. Shaw.1972. "The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media."Public Opinion Quarterly36(2):176-87.
47.
Mutz, D.1992. "Impersonal Influence: Effects of Representations of Public Opinion on Political Attitudes." Political Behavior14(2):89-122.
48.
Mutz, D.1997. "Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make It So?" Journal of Politics57:104-25.
49.
Norrander, B.1993. "Nomination Choices: Caucus and Primary Outcomes, 1976-1988 ." American Journal of Political Science37:343-64.
50.
Norrander, B.2006. "The Attrition Game: Initial Resources, Initial Contests and the Exit of Candidates during the US Presidential Primary Season." British Journal of Political Science36:487-507.
51.
Paletz, D.L.2001. The Media in American Politics: Contents and Consequences . 2nd Edition. New York: Longman.
52.
Patterson, T.E.1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President . New York: Praeger.
53.
Popkin, S.L.1991. The ReasoningVoter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Preacher, K.J., and A.F. Hayes.2008. "Mediation and the Estimation of Indirect Effects in Communication Research." In The Sage Guide to Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research, ed. A. Hayes, M. Slater, and L. Snyder, 13-54. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
55.
Prinz, T.S.1995. "Media Markets and Candidate Awareness in House Elections, 1978-1990." Political Communication12:305-25.
56.
Ramsden, G.P.1996. "Media Coverage of Issues and Candidates: What Balance Is Appropriate in a Democracy?" Political Science Quarterly111(1):65-81.
57.
Ridout, T.N., and R. Mellen Jr.2007. "Does the Media Agenda Reflect the Candidates' Agenda?" The International Journal of Press/Politics12(2):44-62.
58.
Rogers, E.M., J.W. Dearing, and D. Bregman.1993. "The Anatomy of Agenda Setting Research ." Journal of Communication43(2A):68-84.
59.
Squire, P.1992. "Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly17:247-63.
60.
Steger, W.P.2000. "Do Primary Voters Draw from a Stacked Deck? Presidential Nominations in an Era of Candidate-centered Campaigns." Presidential Studies Quarterly30:727-53.
61.
Steger, W.P., A. Dowdle, and R.E. Atkins.2004. "The New Hampshire Effect in Presidential Nominations." Political Research Quarterly57:375-90.
62.
Tuchman, G.1978. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
