We demonstrate that the news media's “spin” or analysis following the last presidential debate in 2004 influenced citizens' evaluations of the candidates. The media's “instant analyses” in the twenty-four hours following the debate was decidedly one-sided, favoring President Bush more than Senator Kerry. We show that the news media's spin persuaded potential voters to alter their attitudes regarding the competing candidates. We rely on a multimethodological approach, including an experiment with a quasi-experimental component, a public opinion survey, and a content analysis. To examine the media's spin, we conducted a content analysis of news coverage on television, on the Internet, and in newspapers for the twenty-four hours following the final 2004 presidential debate. Second, to examine how citizens reacted to the media's coverage, we relied on a representative public opinion survey conducted immediately following the debate. In addition, we conducted an experiment where certain individuals were exposed to the debate, while others were not, and we tracked these subjects over the course of a week to determine the stability of their attitudes in the midst of intense media coverage.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1978. “The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality .” American Journal of Political Science22:680—90.
2.
Bartels, Larry M.1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bartels, Larry M.1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review78: 267—85.
4.
Bartels, Larry M.2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24:117—50.
5.
Benoit, William L., Mitchell S. McKinney, and Michael T. Stephenson .2002. “Effects of Watching Primary Debates in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign” Journal of Communication52:316—31.
6.
Bennett, W. Lance.2005. News as Reality TV: Election Coverage and the Democratization of Truth. Critical Studies in Media Communication22:171—7.
7.
Best, Samuel J., and Clark Hubbard.1999.“Maximizing`MinimalEffects:'The Impact of Early Primary Season Debates on Voter Preferences.” American Politics Quarterly27:450—67.
8.
Blais, Andre, and Martin M. Boyer .1996. “Assessing the Impact of Televised Debates:The Case of the 1988 Canadian Election” British Journal of Political Science26: 143—64.
9.
Carter, Richard F.1977. “Some Effects of the Debates” In The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960, ed. Sidney Kraus.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10.
Chaffee, Steven H.1978. “Presidential Debates: Are They Helpful to Voters? ” Communication Monographs45:331—46.
11.
Fridkin, Kim L., Patrick J. Kenney, Sarah Allen Gershon, Karen Schafer, and Gina Serignese Woodall.2007. “Capturing the Power of a Campaign Event: The 2004 Presidential Debate in Tempe.” The Journal of Politics69:770—86.
12.
Friedrich, Robert J.1982. In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations. American Journal of Political Science26:797—833.
13.
Geer, John G.1988. “The Effects of Presidential Debates on the Electorate's Preferences for Candidates.” American Politics Quarterly16:486—501.
14.
Holbrook, Thomas M.1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications.
15.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder .1987. News that Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Kinder, Donald R.1986. “Presidential Character Revisited.” In Political Cognition, ed. Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Kinder, Donald R.2003. “Communication and Politics in the Age of Information .” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology , ed. David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, Robert Jervis , 357—93. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Kinder, Donald R., Mark D. Peters, Robert P. Abelson, and Susan T. Fiske .1980. “Presidential Prototypes .” Political Behavior2:315—37.
19.
Kraus, Sidney, and Raymond G. Smith , 1977. “Issues and Images .” In The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960, ed. Sidney Kraus.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
20.
Lang, Gladys E., and Kurt Lang.1978. “Immediate and Delayed Responses to the Carter-Ford Debate: Assessing Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly42:322—41.
21.
Lanoue, David J.1992. “One That Made a Difference: Cognitive Consistency, Political Knowledge, and the 1980 Presidential Debate.” Public Opinion Quarterly56:168—84.
22.
Lanoue, David J., and Peter R. Schrott .1989. “The Effects of Primary Season Debates on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior11:289—306.
23.
Lemert, James B., William R. Elliott, James M. Bernstein, William L. Rosenberg, and Karl J. Nestvold .1991. News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers
24.
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen McGraw, Patrick Stroh.1989. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation .” American Political Science Review, 83:399—419.
25.
Lowry, Dennis T., Janet A. Bridges, and Paul A. Barefield , 1990. “Effects of TV `Instant Analysis and Querulous Criticism:' Following the first Bush-Dukakis Debate .” Journalism Quarterly67:814—25.
26.
Markus, Gregory B.1982. “Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study.” American Political Science Review76:538—60.
27.
McKinney, Mitchell S., Lynda Lee Kaid, and Terry A. Robertson .2001. “The Front-Runner, Contenders, and Also-Rans: Effects of Watching a 2000 Republican Primary Debate ” American Behavioral Scientist44:2232—51.
28.
McKinnon, Lori Melton, and John C. Tedesco .1999. “The Influence of Medium and Media Commentary on Presidential Debate Effects.” In The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign Communication , ed. L. L. Kaid and D. G. Bystrom, 191—206. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
McKinnon, Lori Melton, John C. Tedesco, and Lynda Lee Kaid.1993. “The Third 1992 Presidential Debate: Channel and Commentary Effects.” Argumentation & Advocacy30:106—18.
30.
Miller, Arthur H., and Michael MacKuen .1979. “Learning about the Candidates: The 1976 Presidential Debates.” Public Opinion Quarterly43:326—46.
31.
Miller, Arthur, Martin Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk.1986. “ Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review80:521—40.
32.
Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks .1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
33.
Nelson, Michael, ed. 2005. The Elections of 2004. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
34.
Paletz, David L., and Richard J.Vinegar. 1977—1978. “Presidents on Television: The Effects of Instant Analysis.”The Public Opinion Quarterly41:488—97.
35.
Patterson, Thomas. E.1993. Out of Order. New York: A. Knopf.
36.
Post, Senja.2004. Monitoring the Presidential Debates: Post-Debate Panels Did Not Focus on Hard Issues. http://www.mediatenor.com/index1.html .
37.
Scheufele, Dietram A.1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication. 49:102—22.
38.
Schnell, Frauke, and Karen Callaghan .2005. “Terrorism, Media Frames, and Framing Effects: A Macro- and Micro-level Analysis” In Framing American Politics, ed. Karen Callaghan and Frauke Schnell, 123—47. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
39.
Shaw, Daron R.1999a. “A Study of Presidential Campaign Event Effects from 1952—1992.” Journal of Politics61:387—422.
40.
Shaw, Daron R.1999b. “The Impact of News Media Favorability and Candidate Events in Presidential Campaigns.” Political Communication16:183—202.
41.
Shaw, Daron R., and Brian Roberts.2000. “Campaign Events and the Prospects of Victory:The 1992 and 1996 U.S. Presidential Elections.” British Journal of Political Science30:259—89.
42.
Sigelman, Lee, and Carol K. Sigelman .1984. “Judgments of the Carter-Reagan Debate: The Eye of the Beholder.” Public Opinion Quarterly48:624—8.
43.
Steeper, Frederick T.1978. “Public Response to Gerald Ford's Statement on Eastern Europe in the Second Debate.” In The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral and Policy Perspectives, ed. George F. Bishop, Robert G. Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck, 84—7. New York: Praeger.
44.
Tsfati,Yariv.2003. “Debating the Debate: The Impact of Exposure to Debate News Coverage and Its Interaction with Exposure to the Actual Debate.” The Harvard International Journal of PressPolitics8:70—86.
45.
Wald, Kenneth D., and Michael B. Lupfer .1978. “The Presidential Debate as Civics Lesson.” Public Opinion Quarterly42:342—53.
46.
Watts, Mark D., David Domke, Dhavan V. Shah, and David P. Fan .1999. “Elite Cues and Media Bias in Presidential Campaigns.” Communication Research26:144—75.
47.
Zaller, John R.1992. Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
