This study measures the relationship between media freedom and corruption, accounting for elements of vertical accountability (electoral competitiveness, civil society, and voter turnout) and horizontal accountability (judicial independence and political system). Results suggest a strong association between media freedom and corruption that runs from high levels of media freedom to low levels of corruption. This study also implies that media freedom might have a stronger indirect effect on corruption when coupled with powerful institutions of horizontal accountability. The data suggest that the association between media freedom and corruption is strongest in countries with parliamentary systems than in those with presidential systems, and that this impact amplifies as the judiciary independence increases.
AhrendRudiger. 2002. “Press Freedom, Human Capital and Corruption.” DELTA Working Paper Series No. 2002–11, Delta, Paris, February.
2.
BeckThorstenClarkeGeorgeGroffAlbertoKeeferPhilipWalshPatrick. 2001. “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review15 (1): 165–76.
3.
BeckerLee B.VladTudirNusserNancy. 2004. “Media Freedom: Conceptualizing and Operationalizing the Outcome of Media Democratization.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Porto Alegre, Brazil, July.
4.
BerkowitzDan. 1992. “Who Sets the Media Agenda? The Ability of Policymakers to Determine News Decisions.” In Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy, ed. KennamerDavid J., 81–102. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
BesleyTimothyBurgessRobin. 2001. “Political Agency, Government Responsiveness and the Role of the Media.” European Economic Review45:629–40.
6.
BesleyTimothyBurgessRobin. 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics117 (4): 1415–51.
7.
BesleyTimothyPratAndrea. 2006. “Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability.” The American Economic Review96:720–36.
8.
BlumkinTomerGradsteinMark. 2002. “Transparency Gloves for the Grabbing Hands? Politics and (Mis)Governance.” Discussion Paper No. 3668, Centre for Economic Policy Research, December.
9.
BovensMark. 2007. “Analyzing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal13 (4): 447–68.
10.
BrunettiAymoWederBeatrice. 2003. “A Free Press Is Bad News for Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics87:1801–24.
11.
ChowdhuryShayamal K.2004. “The Effect of Democracy and Free Press on Corruption: An Empirical Test.” Economic Letters85 (1): 93–101.
12.
CingranelliDavid L.RichardsDavid L.2008. The Cingranelli-Richards Human Rights Dataset Version 2008.03.12. http://www.humanrightsdata.org
13.
DaltonRussel J.BeckPaul A.1998. “A Test of Media-Centered Agenda Setting: Newspaper Content and Public Interests in a Presidential Election.” Political Communication15:463–81.
DiamondLarryPlattnerMarc F.SchedlerAndreas. 1999. “Introduction.” In The Self Restraining State, ed. SchedlerAndreasDiamondLarryPlantterMarc F., 1–12. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
16.
DjankovSimeonMcLeishCaraleeNenovaTatianaShleiferAndrei. 2003. “Who Owns the Media?”The Journal of Law and Economics46 (2): 341–82.
17.
DomingoPilar. 1999. “Judicial Independence and Judicial Reform in Latin America.” In The Self-Restraining State, ed. SchedlerAndreasDiamondLarryPlantterMarc F., 151–76. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
18.
DubnickMelvin J. 2002. “Seeking Salvation for Accountability.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29–September 1.
19.
FellDafydd. 2005. “Political Liberalization and Political Corruption in Taiwan.” The China Quarterly184:875–93.
20.
FoxJonathan. 2000. “Civil Society and Political Accountability: Propositions for Discussion.” Presented at “Institutions, Accountability and Democratic Governance in Latin America” meeting of The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, May.
21.
FranckenNatalieMintenBartSwinnenJohan M.2005. “Listen to the Radio! Media and Corruption: Evidence from Madagascar.” Discussion Paper No. 115, LICOS Centre for Transition Economics, February.
22.
FreilleSebastianHaqueEmranulKnellerRichard. 2007. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Press Freedom and Corruption.” European Journal of Political Economy23 (4): 838–62.
23.
GazianoCecilie. 1978. “Relationship between Public Opinion and Supreme Court Decisions: Was Mr. Dooley Right?” Communication Research5:131–49.
24.
GiglioliPier P. 1996. “Political Corruption and the Media: The Tangentopoli Affair.” International Social Science Journal48 (3): 381–94.
25.
GuntherRichardMughanAnthony. 2000. Democracy and Media: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HallRichardO’NeilPatrick H.1998. “Institutions, Transitions, and the Media: A Comparison of Hungary and Romania.” In Communicating Democracy: The Media and Political Transitions, ed. O’NeilPatrick, 125–46. London: Lynne Rienner.
27.
JohnstonMichael. 1997. What Can Be Done About Entrenched Corruption?Presented at the annual meeting of the World Bank Conference on Development Economies, Washington, D.C, April 30–May 1.
28.
La PortaRafaelLopez-de-SilanesFlorencioSchleiferAndreiVishnyRobert W.1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization15 (1): 222–79.
29.
LaverMichaelShepsleKenneth A.1999. “Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, ed. PrezevorskiAdamStokesSusan C.ManinBernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
30.
LedermanDanielLoayzaNorman V.SoaresRodrigo R.2005. “Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter.” Economics & Politics17 (1): 1–35.
31.
LindstedtCatharinaNaurinDaniel. 2010. “Transparency Is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption.” International Political Science Review31 (4): 301–22.
32.
LinzJuan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy1 (1): 51–70.
33.
MarkowskiRadoslaw. 2006. “Political Accountability and Institutional Design in New Democracies.” International Journal of Sociology36 (2): 45–75.
MarshallThomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
36.
McCombsMaxwell E. 2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
37.
MontinolaGabriellaJackmanRobert W.2002. “Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study?”British Journal of Political Science32:147–70.
38.
O’DonnellGuillermo. 1999. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” In The Self-Restraining State, ed. SchedlerAndreasDiamondLarryPlantterMarc F., 29–52. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
39.
PasekJosh. 2006. “Fueling or Following Democracy? Analyzing the Role of Media Liberalization in Democratic Transition.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 30–September 3.
40.
PerssonTorstenTabelliniGuidoTrebbiFrancesco. 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association1 (4): 958–89.
41.
PriceMonroe E.AbbottSusanMorganLibby. 2011. Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators. New York: Peter Lang.
42.
PriceMonroe E.RozumilowiczBeataVerhulstStefaan G.2002. Media Reform. London: Routledge.
43.
PritchardDavid. 1986. “Homicide and Bargained Justice: The Agenda Setting Effect of Crime News on Prosecutors.” Public Opinion Quarterly50:143–59.
44.
PritchardDavid. 1992. “The News Media and Public Policy.” In Public Opinion, the Press, and Public, ed. KennamerDavid J., 103–12. Westport, CT: Praeger.
45.
PritchardDavidDiltsJohn P.BerkowitzDan. 1987. “Prosecutors’ Use of Eternal Agendas in Prosecuting Pornography Cases.” Journalism Quarterly64:392–8.
46.
ProtessDavid L.CookFay L.CurtinThomas R.GordonMargare T.LeffDonna R.McCombsMaxwell E.MillerPeter. 1987. “The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking Targeting Toxic Waste.” The Public Opinion Quarterly51 (2): 166–85.
47.
PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48.
RauchJamesEvansPeter B.2000. “Bureaucratic Structures and Economic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics75:49–71.
49.
ReinikkaRitvaSvenssonJakob. 2004. “The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 3239, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., March.
50.
RobertsAndrew. 2008. “Hyperaccountability: Economic Voting in Central and Eastern Europe.” Electoral Studies27:533–46.
51.
RozumilowiczBeata. 2002. “Democratic Change: A Theoretical Perspective.” In Media Reform: Democratizing the Media, Democratizing the State, ed. PriceMonroe E.RozumilowiczBeataVerhulstStefaan G., 9–16. New York: Routledge.
52.
SchedlerAndreas. 1999. “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In The Self-Restraining State, ed. SchedlerAndreasDiamondLarryPlantterMarc F., 13–28. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
53.
StapenhurstRichard. 2000. The Media’s Role in Curbing Corruption. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Institute.
54.
StrombergDavid. 2001. “Mass Media and Public Policy.” European Economic Review45:652–63.
55.
SuphachalasaiSuphachol. 2005. “Bureaucratic Corruption and Mass Media.” Research Paper No. 05, Environmental Economy and Policy, January.
56.
TanYueWeaverDavid. 2007. “Agenda-Setting Effects among the Media, the Public, and the Congress, 1946–2004.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly84 (4): 729–44.
57.
TreismanDaniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross National Study.” Journal of Public Economics76:399–457.
58.
VaidyaSamartha. 2005. “Corruption in the Media’s Gaze.” European Journal of Political Economy21:667–87.
59.
WeaverDavidDrewDan. 2001. “‘Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter?’ The Entity from Which ERIC Acquires the Content, Including Journal, Organization, and Conference Names, or by Means of Online Submission from the Author.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly78 (4): 787–98.
