Using data from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, this paper compares the earnings premium and employment share of jobs in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) across 11 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The results reveal that the STEM wage premium is higher in the United States than in any of the other comparison countries, despite the fact that the U.S. has a larger share of workers in STEM jobs. We also find evidence that the premium varies significantly across STEM sub-fields and education levels, and that the premium tends to be higher in countries with lower unionization rates, less employment protection, or a larger share of employment in the public sector.
AltonjiJ. G.ArcidiaconoP.MaurelA. (2016). The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: Determinants and wage effects. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 5, pp. 305–396). Elsevier.
BoundJ.BragaB.KhannaG.TurnerS. (2021). The globalization of postsecondary education: The role of international students in the US higher education system. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(1), 163–184.
8.
BridenstineJ.CordovaFKratsiosM. (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education. Committee on STEM Education of the National Science & Technology Council. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590474
CroceG.GhignoniE. (2020). The evolution of wage gaps between STEM and non-STEM graduates in a technological following economy. Applied Economics, 52(23), 2427–2442.
12.
DemingD. J.NorayK. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965–2005.
GrilichesZ. (1992). Introduction to “output measurement in the service sectors.” In Z.Griliches (Ed.) Output measurement in the service sectors (pp. 1–22). University of Chicago Press.
16.
HansonG. H.SlaughterM. J. (2018). High-skilled immigration and the rise of STEM occupations in US employment. In C. R.HultenV. A.Ramey (Eds.), Education, skills, and technical change: Implications for future US GDP growth (pp. 465–500). University of Chicago Press.
17.
HanushekE. A.SchwerdtG.WiederholdS.WoessmannL. (2015). Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. European Economic Review, 73, 103–130.
JakubowskiM.PokropekA. (2019). Piaactools: A program for data analysis with PIAAC data. The Stata Journal, 19(1), 112–128.
21.
KahnL. M. (2000). Wage inequality, collective bargaining, and relative employment from 1985 to 1994: Evidence from fifteen OECD countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(4), 564–579.
22.
KoonceD.ZhouJ.AndersonC.DyahH.ConleyV. (2011). What is STEM? American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver. https://peer.asee.org/what-is-stem
23.
LangdonD.McKittrickG.BeedeD.KhanB.DomsM. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. ESA Issue Brief# 03-11. US Department of Commerce. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522129
24.
LightA.RamaA. (2019). Moving beyond the STEM/non-STEM dichotomy: Wage benefits to increasing the STEM-intensities of college coursework and occupational requirements. Education Economics, 27(4), 358–382.
OlitskyN. H. (2014). How do academic achievement and gender affect the earnings of STEM majors? A propensity score matching approach. Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 245–271.
30.
PeriG.ShihK. (2015). Foreign scientists and engineers and economic growth in Canadian labor markets. In NijkampP.PootJ.BakensJ. (Eds.), The economics of cultural diversity (pp. 358–383). Edward Elgar Publishing.
31.
PeriG.ShihK.SparberC. (2015). STEM workers, H-1B visas, and productivity in US cities. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(S1), S225–S255.
StockardJ.RohlfingC. M.RichmondG. L. (2021). Equity for women and underrepresented minorities in STEM: Graduate experiences and career plans in chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(4), e2020508118.
