Clinical nurses are consistently exposed to high levels of occupational stress, which can undermine their professional quality of life, resulting in burnout, reduced compassion satisfaction, and psychological exhaustion. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, resilience has emerged as a critical protective factor in helping nurses manage these stressors. Moreover, connectedness to nature has gained recognition as a potential influence on enhancing nurses’ professional quality of life.
Purpose
Drawing on Nature-Based Biopsychosocial Resilience Theory and General Systems Theory, this research investigates how connectedness to nature influences nurses’ Professional Quality of Life, exploring the mediating role of psychological resilience.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among clinical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Path analysis examined direct and indirect relationships among connectedness to nature, psychological resilience, and three components of professional quality of life: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress.
Results
Connectedness to nature was significantly associated with higher compassion satisfaction and lower burnout. Psychological resilience partially mediated these relationships, indicating that while connectedness to nature may offer immediate stress-buffering benefits, it also contributes to the development of resilience, a critical long-term protective resource. No significant effects were observed for secondary traumatic stress.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that connectedness to nature serves as a potent, nature-based avenue for strengthening nurses’ psychological capital and elevating critical components of their professional quality of life. This underscores the compelling rationale for integrating nature-based strategies into healthcare environments to proactively foster the emotional well-being and long-term sustainability of frontline nurses
AkberE.KauserS. T.ShamimI.NaseemS. (2023). Professional quality of life and patient outcomes: Mediating role of missed nursing care. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 12(3), 984–993. https://doi.org/10.62345/
2.
AlonaziO.AlshowkanA.ShdaifatE. (2023). The relationship between psychological resilience and professional quality of life among mental health nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01346-1
AtayN.SahinG.BuzluS. (2021). The relationship between psychological resilience and professional quality of life in nurses. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 59(6), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20210218-01
5.
BaekH. S.LeeK. U.JooE. J.LeeM. Y.ChoiK. S. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 7(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109
6.
BoatswainB. (2023). Addressing secondary traumatic stress among nurses: A brief unit-based group program. Group, 47(1–2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1353/grp.2023.0004
7.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
8.
CordozaM.UlrichR. S.ManulikB. J.GardinerS. K.FitzpatrickP. S.HazenT. M.MirkaA.PerkinsR. S. (2018). Impact of nurses taking daily work breaks in a hospital garden on burnout. American Journal of Critical Care, 27(6), 508–512. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2018131
9.
CusackL.SmithM.HegneyD.ReesC. S.BreenL.WittR.RogersC.WilliamsA.CrossW.CheungK. (2016). Exploring environmental factors in nursing workplaces that promote psychological resilience: Constructing a unified theoretical model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00600
10.
DolemanG.De LeoA.BloxsomeD. (2023). The impact of pandemics on healthcare providers’ workloads: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(12), 4434–4454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15690
11.
ElliottC. R. (2024). The negative impacts of secondary traumatic stress and mutual suffering: Considerations in the hospital setting. British Journal of Nursing, 33(19), 930–932. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.0103
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
13.
GilroyH.KobinaA.MaloneJ. F.RainfordM.WilliamsJ.ReimersA. K.SarbackerL. (2024). Trauma-informed professional development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 40(6), 288–293. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnd.0000000000001093
14.
GimW. S.LeeM. H.KimK. H. (2019). A validation study of the Korean version of the connectedness to nature scale. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 22(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2019.22.6.621
15.
González-NuevoC.PostigoÁGonzález-MenéndezA.Alonso-PérezF.CuestaM.González-PandoD. (2024). Professional quality of life and fear of COVID-19 among Spanish nurses: A longitudinal repeated cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33(1), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16688
HendersonA.JewellT.HuangX.SimpsonA. (2024). Personal trauma history and secondary traumatic stress in mental health professionals: A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 32(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13082
18.
HeoY. M.LeeM.JangS. J. (2021). Intentions of frontline nurses regarding COVID-19 patient care: A cross-sectional study in Korea. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(6), 1880–1888. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13333
19.
HuangX.LuoL.LiX.LinY.ChenZ.JinC. (2022). How do nature-based activities benefit essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic? The mediating effect of nature connectedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16501. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416501
JeonM.KimS.KimS. (2023). Association between resilience, professional quality of life, and caring behavior in oncology nurses: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 53(6), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.23058
22.
KangM. J.KimH. S.KimJ. Y. (2024). Development and effects of a non-face-to-face forest therapy program for nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 21(1), e12566. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12566
23.
KellyL. A.GeeP. M.ButlerR. J. (2021). Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and position turnover. Nursing Outlook, 69(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.008
24.
KimK.HanY.KwakY.KimJ. S. (2015). Professional quality of life and clinical competencies among Korean nurses. Asian Nursing Research, 9(3), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.03.002
25.
LatsouD.BolosiF.-M.AndroutsouL.GeitonaM. (2022). Professional Quality of Life and Occupational Stress in Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greece. Health Services Insights, 15, https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329221096042
26.
ManomenidisG.PanagopoulouE.MontgomeryA. (2019). Resilience in nursing: The role of internal and external factors. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(1), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12662
27.
MartinL.WhiteM. P.HuntA.RichardsonM.PahlS.BurtJ. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
28.
MaunderR. G.HeeneyN. D.JeffsL. P.WiesenfeldL. A.HunterJ. J. (2024). A longitudinal study of hospital workers’ mental health from fall 2020 to the end of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2023. Scientific Reports, 14, 26137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77493-5
29.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M.Bruehlman-SenecalE.DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745
30.
MenardoE.Di MarcoD.RamosS.BrondinoM.ArenasA.CostaP.Vaz de CarvalhoC.PasiniM. (2022). Nature and mindfulness to cope with work-related stress: A narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105948
31.
MiddletonR.Astell-BurtT. (2023). Nurses and nature: Does green space make a difference?Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(15–16), 4214–4216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16697
32.
MohammadiM.PeyroviH.MahmoodiM. (2017). The relationship between professional quality of life and caring ability in critical care nurses. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(5), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000263
33.
PeterE.MohammedS.KillackeyT.MacIverJ.VariathC. (2022). Nurses’ experiences of ethical responsibilities of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Ethics, 29(4), 844–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211068135
34.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
35.
PrendergastV.ElmasryS.JuhlN. A.ChappleK. M. (2023). Resilience room use and its effect on distress among nurses and allied staff. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 55(3), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000701
36.
RemegioW.RiveraR. R.GriffinM. Q.FitzpatrickJ. J. (2021). The professional quality of life and work engagement of nurse leaders. Nurse Leader, 19(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2020.08.001
37.
ScheepersR. A.van den BroekT.CrammJ. M.FinkenflügelH.NieboerA. P. (2023). Changes in work conditions and well-being among healthcare professionals in long-term care settings in The Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study. Human Resources for Health, 21(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00847-z
38.
SheffieldD.ButlerC. W.RichardsonM. (2022). Improving nature connectedness in adults: A meta-analysis, review and agenda. Sustainability, 14(19), 12494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912494
39.
StammB. H. (2010). The concise ProQOL manual (2nd ed). ProQOL.org.
40.
SukutO.Sahin-BayindirG.Ayhan-BalikC. H.AlbalE. (2022). Professional quality of life and psychological resilience among psychiatric nurses. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58(1), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12791
41.
UhingW.TannenbaumL. (2022). Getting back to nature: Healing the mind, body, and spirit of healthcare workers. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 29, 100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100583
Von BertalanffyL. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
44.
von ElmE.AltmanD. G.EggerM.PocockS. J.GøtzscheP. C.VandenbrouckeJ. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
45.
WhiteM. P.HartigT.MartinL.PahlS.van den BergA. E.WellsN. M.CostongsC.DzhambovA. M.ElliottL. R.GodfreyA.HartlA.KonijnendijkC.LittJ. S.LovellR.LymeusF.O'DriscollC.PichlerC.PousoS.RazaniN.van den BoschM. (2023). Nature-based biopsychosocial resilience: An integrative theoretical framework for research on nature and health. Environment International, 181, 108234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108234
46.
YavaşG.ÖzerliA. N. (2025). The public image of nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. International Nursing Review, 72(1), e12922. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12922
47.
ZakeriM. A.RahiminezhadE.SalehiF.GanjehH.DehghanM. (2022). Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue and hardiness among nurses: A comparison before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.815180
