Staff Perceptions before and after Adding Single-Family Rooms in the NICU

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate staff perceptions of environmental quality before and after the renovation of an existing open-bay neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the addition of 23 single-family NICU rooms in the Wasie Neonatal ICU at Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital. Background: In recent years there has been an increase in the design and construction of single-family rooms (SFRs) because they provide more privacy for families, offer better control over environmental stimuli such as lighting and noise, and possibly reduce infections. On the other hand, this model can cause staff members to feel isolated from one another, reduce their ability to respond quickly in a crisis situation, or impose additional demands on them. Few studies document the advantages and disadvantages of the SFR NICU model.

Methods:

This study utilized pre- and post-move surveys to investigate staff perceptions of the NICU.

Results:

Overall, staff members perceive the quality of the work environment, and the safety and quality of the environment provided to patients and their families, as better in the renovated, combination NICU design (SFR and open bay) when compared to the open-bay, pre-move design.

Conclusion:

In spite of the potential drawbacks of having SFRs in the NICU, the study demonstrates that nurses may perceive associated benefits, such as a reduction of job stress and improvements in parental privacy, along with other positive outcomes.

Keywords

NICU design single-family rooms healthcare design healthcare facility design evidence-based design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Als

Lawhon

Duffy

H. H.

McAnulty

Gibes-Grossman

, & Blickman

J. G.

(1994). Individualized developmental care for the very-low-birth-weight preterm infant: Medical and neurofunctional effects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 853–858. [Cited in Shepley, Harris, & White, 2008]

Bremmer

Byers

J. F.

, & Ermalynn

(2003). Noise and the premature infant: Physiological effects and practice implications. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 32(4), 447–454.

Carlson

Walsh

Wergin

Schwarzkopf

, & Ecklund

(2006). Challenges in design and transition to a private room model in the neonatal intensive care unit. Advances in Neonatal Care, 6(5), 271–280.

Domanico

Davis

D. K.

Coleman

, & Davis

B. O.

Jr. (2010). Documenting the NICU design dilemma: Parent and staff perceptions of open ward versus single family room units. Journal of Perinatology, 30, 343–351.

Ferber

S. G.

, & Makhoul

I. R.

(2004). The effect of skln-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) shortly after birth on the neurobehavioral responses of the term newborn: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 113(4), 858–865. [Cited in Shepley, Harris & White, 2008]

Harris

Shepley

White

Kolberg

, & Harrell

(2006) The impact of single-family room design on patients and caregivers: Executive summary. Journal of Perinatology, Suppl 3, S38–S48.

Mathur

N. S.

(2004). A single-room NICU—The next generation evolution in the design of neonatal intensive care units. American Institute of Architects Academy Journal. Retrieved from http://www.rad-consultants.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Pub_11.pdf

Moon

(2005). Construction and costs—Going up. Modern Healthcare, 35(10), 30–42.

Shepley

Harris

White

, & Steinberg

(2008). Impact of single-family NICU rooms on family behavior. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Healthcare Design Conference, November 8–11, 2008, Washington, DC.

10.

Shepley

M. M.

Harris

D. D.

, & White

(2008). Open-bay and single-family-room neonatal intensive care units: Caregiver satisfaction and stress. Environment and Behavior, 40(2), 249–268.

11.

Sisson

D. A.

, & Socker

H. R.

(1989). Analyzing and interpreting Likert-type survey data. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 31(2), 81–85.

12.

Smith

Schoenbeck

, & Clayton

(2009). Staff perceptions of work quality of a neonatal intensive care unit before and after transition from an open-bay to a private room design. Work, 33, 211–227.

13.

Smith

T. J.

Clayton

, & Schoenbeck

(2005). Transition from an open-bay to a private room neonatal intensive care unit design—A human factors approach. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting: 2005 (pp. 974–978). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

14.

Stevens

D. C.

Helseth

C. C.

Khan

M. A.

Munson

D. P.

, & Reid

E. J.

(2011). A comparison of parent satisfaction in an open-bay and single-family room neonatal intensive care unit. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 110–123.

15.

Stevens

D. C.

Helseth

C. C.

Khan

M. A.

Munson

D. P.

, & Smith

T. J.

(2010). Neonatal intensive care nursery staff perceive enhanced workplace quality with the single-family room design. Journal of Perinatology, 30, 352–358.

16.

Ulrich

R. S.

Zimring

Zhu

DuBose

Seo

H. B.

Choi

Y. S.

Joseph

(2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61–125.

17.

White

(2003). Individual rooms in the NICU—An evolving concept. Journal of Perinatology, 23, S22–S24.

18.

Bosch

Bledsoe

and Jenzarli

(2012). Staff perceptions before and after adding single-family rooms in the NICU. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5(4), 64–75.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB