Abstract
Purpose:
There is a clear call for a single-source knowledge base linking literature on architecture and human outcomes. However, this seemingly simple need relies upon a vast source of information from multiple disciplines, each with their own vocabulary, structures, and modes of disciplinary thought.
Background:
The “Information Age” provides an abundance of research from the sciences as well as the humanities. Despite unprecedented access via public and licensed databases, searching across knowledge repositories remains a labor-intensive and skilled task. It therefore behooves the design profession to collaborate with experts in research, and to seek new skills for searching, interpreting, and applying evidence to design.
Methods:
The pattern of database usage by 71 professionals involved with evidence-based design in healthcare facilities was studied. Respondents represented a range of interests including healthcare practitioners and executives, researchers, and design professionals.
Findings:
Survey analysis revealed that a large number of information repositories are used (45), though few sources were used in common among the respondents.
Recommendations:
Knowledge informatics strategies are reviewed, and concepts put forward advocating the design of an information source with multiple portals, vocabularies, and outputs to serve design, research, and healthcare practitioners alike.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
