Abstract
The study aims to enhance the design process of tissue-engineered implants by evaluating the effects of scaffold reinforcement and cultivation conditions on extracellular matrix (ECM) development. The research investigates the hypothesis that mechanical stress drives ECM production and alignment. Furthermore, we have explored the potential of an in silico growth model to complement in vitro findings for accelerated development processes. The study employed fiber-reinforced and nonreinforced scaffolds fabricated using warp-knitted textiles and fibrin gel. Myofibroblasts embedded in the scaffolds were cultivated under static and dynamic conditions. ECM development was evaluated through mechanical testing, hydroxyproline assays, and microscopy, while an in silico growth model was used to predict ECM behavior. Static cultivation resulted in significant ECM development in both reinforced and nonreinforced samples, with nonreinforced scaffolds showing higher collagen content and alignment along the load direction. In contrast, dynamic cultivation inhibited ECM formation, potentially due to cross-contraction and washout effects. Fiber-reinforced scaffolds exhibited higher elasticity and sustained stress across cycles without structural damage. The in silico model provided valuable insights but overestimated mechanical properties due to limited validation data. Reinforced scaffolds maintained geometry and elasticity, suggesting suitability for load-bearing applications. Nonreinforced scaffolds facilitated higher ECM production but were prone to structural damage. Dynamic cultivation requires optimization, such as prestatic cultivation, to support ECM development. The combined in vitro and in silico approach offers a promising framework for scaffold design, reducing the reliance on iterative experimental processes.
Impact Statement
The development process of tissue-engineered implants is iterative. A model-based approach has the potential to make the entire process quicker and more cost-effective. We developed a high-throughput method for evaluating extracellular matrix growth and formation in tissue-engineered samples under static and dynamic conditions. Additionally, we used an existing in silico growth model to compare in vitro and in silico results. Model-based scaffold testing offers a novel alternative to the lengthy iterative processes traditionally used to optimize scaffolds for specific tissue engineering applications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
