Abstract
In this study, an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)/photodiode array method was developed for the simultaneous determination of trigonellan glucoside (
Phytochemical investigation of the ethyl acetate and methylene chloride fractions of the ethanolic extract of

Chemical structure of isoflavan 1-3.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) activation by the isoflavans
Literature survey revealed that many methods have been developed for the assay of isoflavonoids in different matrices such as legume extract and biological fluids, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 6 and UPLC-tandem mass spectroscopy (MS). 7 No method was reported for the assay of 4-hydroxyflavans.
UPLC has been used recently in the quantitation of compounds in complex matrices, especially those in low concentration, and with a high degree of accuracy. The resolution power of the UPLC makes it highly suitable for the analysis of plant extracts with complex chemical make-up. 8,9 The use of photodiode array (PDA) in conjunction with UPLC provides a high degree of accuracy in identifying the tested compound(s) in the complex matrices of plant extracts by using both the retention time and ultraviolet (UV) spectrum of each peak. The PDA detector maximizes the reliability of the method by its ability to establish peak purity.
Due to the aforementioned important biological activities, we proceeded to design and validate a method for the quantitative determination of the isoflavans
Results and Discussion
Method Development
Optimization of the conditions
The system suitability test was used to ensure that the UPLC system and procedures are adequate for the analysis performed and is an integral part of many analytical procedures. During the system suitability test, relative SD (RSD) of the peak areas was ≤2.0% in all cases, the number of theoretical plates per column was more than 3000, the USP (United States Pharmacopeia) tailing factor was ≤2.0, 10 and the resolution factor was >1.5.
Optimization of sample preparation
Different mobile phases and columns were tested to enhance the separation and shape of the peaks of the 3 isoflavans to be analyzed. Methanol, acetonitrile, and 100% of water were tested as potential mobile phases. Both Acquity UPLC C18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) and CORTECS UPLC C18 columns (75 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.6 µm) were evaluated as stationary phases. Based on the shape of the peaks and the resolution between them, acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid and Acquity UPLC C18 column were found to be the optimal mobile and stationary phases. The column temperature was 55°C, and the flow was set at 0.5 mL/min. A representative PDA contour plot is depicted in Figure 2.

Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array contour plot for the
Method Validation
Selectivity
The PDA contour plot (Figure 2) obtained from a representative sample showed that there is no significant interference in the chromatogram. Also, the calculated selectivity parameter having a value >1 shows the presence of a selective baseline separation between the 3 isoflavans and other matrix components.
Linearity, limit of detection, and limit of quantitation
The calibration curve of standard isoflavan
Linear Regression Data for the Calibration Curves of the 3 Isoflavans (1-3).
The limit of detection (LOD) values were 0.018, 0.042, and 0.002 mg/mL for isoflavans
Accuracy and precision
The precision for isoflavan
In testing, the accuracy in the assay of isoflavan
Intraday/interday precisions and accuracy were determined for the 3 tested isoflavans using the extract. The results, shown in Table 2, demonstrated that the precision showed RSD% ≤8.3, and accuracy showed RSD% ≤3.4. All the results were within the acceptance range of ±15%. 6,10
Summary of the 3 Isoflavans (1-3) Concentrations, Precision, Accuracy and Recovery in
RSD, relative SD.
Robustness
A slight variation of the level of the flow rate during the analysis of isoflavans
Taken together, the above results showed that a sensitive, reproducible, and robust method for the analysis of isoflavans in a complex sample matrix has been developed and validated for use in the analysis of isoflavans in herbal extracts.
The current UPLC quantitative assay has shown that
Experimental
Chemicals
Ethanol was used for extraction while dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used for the preparation of samples and standard solutions. Water, acetonitrile, and formic acid used in the solvent system of the UPLC method were HPLC analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Reference standards for isoflavans (
Instruments and Conditions
UPLC-electrospray ionization-MS conditions
Analyses were carried out using the Waters Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) that consisted of a binary solvent manager, sample manager, heated column compartment, PDA detector, ESI mass detector (QDa), and a cooling autosampler. The instrument was controlled by Waters Empower 3 software. Chromatographic separations were performed on an Acquity UPLC C18 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) that was maintained at 55°C. The mobile phase consisted of (A) 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and (B) 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile with the following gradient elution program: started at 90% A and 10% B rising to 80% A and 20% B from 0 to 4 min; then to 60% A and 40% B in 2 minutes; reaching 50% A and 50% B; then to 100% acetonitrile for 5 minutes. The system was then restored to the initial conditions in 3 minutes for a total run time of 20 minutes. The flow rate was maintained at 0.5 mL/min and, using the partial loop mode, the injection volume was 2 µL. UV spectra were recorded from 210 to 400 nm, and the quantitation wavelength was set at 284 nm.
Preparation of T. stellata Extract
The dried
Preparation of the Standard Solutions
The stock solutions of isoflavans
Method Validation
The method was validated in accordance with the Guidelines of the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) 11 for validation of analytical procedures used for drugs and drug products and USP validation of compendial procedures. 12
Selectivity
Selectivity was measured by comparing the peaks of the 3 isoflavans from 6 injections of the extract to that in an extract spiked with the 3 isoflavans. The quantitative analyses were carried out using UV/PDA (284 nm) for all 3 isoflavans. The selectivity of the method for each peak was further checked by comparing the λmax of the UV spectrum for each peak with the spectrum of each standard compound peak appearing at the same retention time. No other components or contaminants in the plant extract were detected at the wavelength for the retention time window of the 3 isoflavans that caused any distortion of the compounds’ spectra. Also, the selectivity index was calculated between isoflavan
Linearity
The calibration standards were prepared by serial dilution of the standard solution with DMSO to obtain 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL of isoflavan
For routine analysis, a 3-point calibration curve within this range, produced by injecting duplicates of 0.05, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/mL of each standard was used with each run of the samples’ solutions.
LOD and LOQ
The lower LOD is the lowest concentration of the analyte in the sample that can be detected but not necessarily quantitated within acceptable limits (±15%), under the stated experimental conditions, while the lower LOQ is the lowest concentration of the analyte that can be quantitated within acceptable limits of accuracy and precision.
According to the ICH guidelines, the detection limit (DL) may be expressed as, DL = 3.3 ơ/S. While the quantitation limit (QL) may be expressed as QL = 10 ơ/S. Where ơ = the SD of the response and
The slope
LOD and LOQ were experimentally verified by diluting known concentrations of the isoflavan standard solutions and measuring signal-to-noise ratio ensuring that it is 3.3:1 for the LOD and 10:1 for the LOQ. The results are listed in Table 1.
Precision
The precision may be calculated as repeatability and/or intermediate precision. Intermediate precision was performed by 6 times a day repeated analysis of the standard solution on different days.
Precision was determined by 6 independent determinations at 100% of the test concentration per day and for 2 days to determine intraday and interday precision with working calibration curves repeated daily. 11 RSD% was calculated. The experiment was repeated by the use of the same equipment, the same analytical procedure in the same laboratory, and on the same instrument. The results are shown in Table 2.
Accuracy and recovery
The accuracy of the method was validated by a standard addition analysis. This involves applying the analytical procedure to spiked mixtures of the sample to which known quantities of the standard have been added to the test solution. Thus, the sample solutions were spiked with 3 different known concentrations of the 3 standard isoflavans.
Three 100 µL aliquots of the sample solution (containing 0.33 mg/mL of isoflavan
The original and the 3 fortified sample solutions for each compound were then analyzed on the same day in duplicates. The differences between the calculated and the found concentrations were determined to evaluate the accuracy of the method.
The percentage recovery for each solution, the mean percent recovery, SD, and RSD% for each set are given in Table 2.
Robustness
ICH defines robustness as a measure of the method’s capability to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. Small changes in the flow rate of the mobile phase were varied in the range of ±10%. The percentage of the mobile phase solvents were varied in the range of ±2% in each solvent along with the gradient system. The column temperature was also changed by ±2°C from the controlled column temperature (55°C) used in the assay method. Robustness of the method was carried out by repeating the test procedure on the test solution and the calibration standards and changing each condition one at a time, with each condition done in triplicate. The results are presented in Table 3.
Robustness Results for the 3 Isoflavans (1-3).
RSD, relative SD.
Evaluating system suitability
The standard solution of isoflavan
Summary of System Suitability.
RSD, relative SD.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported in part by the grant provided by the Egyptian government through the joint supervision program (JS-2984).
