α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Glucose Uptake Stimulatory Effects of Phenolic Compounds From Dendrobium christyanum

Abstract

A methanolic extract from the dried root of Dendrobium christyanum Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae) exhibited α-glucosidase inhibitory activity and glucose uptake stimulatory effect. Chromatographic separation of the extract led to the isolation of 13 phenolic compounds (1-13). Their structures were determined by spectroscopic analysis. The isolates were then evaluated for in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory and glucose uptake stimulatory activities. Methyl haematommate (1), methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate (3), n-docosyl 4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamate (4), coniferyl aldehyde (6), 4,5-dihydroxy-2-methoxy-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (7), gigantol (10), and diorcinolic acid (13) showed higher α-glucosidase inhibitory activity than the drug acarbose. Moreover, n-docosyl 4-hydroxyl-trans-cinnamate (4), vanillin (5), and coniferyl aldehyde (6) could enhance glucose uptake by L6 myotubes. Compounds 4 and 6 appear to be potential hypoglycemic agents since they possess both α-glucosidase inhibitory and glucose uptake stimulatory activities. This study is the first report on the chemical constituents and antidiabetic activity of D. christyanum.

Keywords

phenolics antidiabetic L6 myotubes α-glucosidase

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disease of abnormal glucose metabolism caused by impaired insulin secretion and/or inefficient utilization of insulin. The hormone insulin is secreted from the β cells of the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas. It plays an essential role in blood glucose homeostasis by facilitating cellular glucose uptake and regulating the metabolism of protein, lipid, and carbohydrate. Untreated DM can produce several complications, such as diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy, resulting in premature death.¹ In type II DM, the most common form of diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance leads to insulin resistance, a condition of decreased responsiveness of target tissues (liver, muscles, and adipose tissues) to regular circulating insulin, and results in postprandial hyperglycemia.²

At present, several types of oral antidiabetic drugs with different mechanisms of action are available. Our study focuses on α-glucosidase inhibiting and glucose-uptake stimulating drugs.

α-Glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) were discovered to control postprandial hyperglycemia in the 1970s and became a new class of antidiabetic drugs in the 1980s, but so far, only a few are commercially available.^3,4 Examples are voglibose and acarbose. They can decrease the absorption of carbohydrates from the small intestine by competitively inhibiting the α-glucosidase enzyme in the brush border and thus lowering the postprandial blood glucose level.⁵ Acarbose is a complex oligosaccharide obtained from the microbial origin,⁵ and its recommended doses are 50-200 mg 3 times daily.⁶ Studies showed that 56%-76% of patients who took AGIs suffered from the side effects related to the digestive system, such as bloating due to indigestible glucose, flatulence, diarrhea, and nausea.⁷ Apart from the above drawbacks, the structures of these AGIs mainly comprise sugar units, and their production processes are complicated.⁵ In recent years, researchers have turned their attention to finding AGI drugs from alternative sources, such as medicinal plants.^8,9 There are several classes of compounds from medicinal plants that have been reported as AGIs, such as terpenoids, flavonoids, and phenylpropanoids.⁴ The investigation for new AGIs from medicinal plants still remain attractive because of the finding of active compounds would be helpful for the development of dietary supplements.

Insulin maintains the glucose homeostasis after a meal by stimulating glucose uptake into skeletal muscles. In type II DM, peripheral insulin resistance in skeletal muscles or adipose tissues leads to defects in insulin-mediated glucose uptake and utilization and then results in hyperglycemia.² Insulin sensitizers can lower the blood glucose level by increasing the glucose uptake in muscles and reducing the hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis.¹⁰ The most frequently used drug in this class is metformin. Although the side effects of metformin, such as diarrhea and flatulence, are well tolerated, there are serious concerns over the long-term use of this drug due to some side effects, such as the decrease in vitamin B₁₂ absorption, lactic acidosis, and macrocytic anemia.¹¹ Thus, alternative glucose-uptake enhancing drugs are still needed.

Dendrobium is one of the large genera in the Orchidaceae family. The genus comprises about 1100 species, and in Thailand, 150 species have been identified.¹² In traditional Chinese medicine, several members of Dendrobium known as “Shihu” have been used to increase body fluid production, relieve indigestion, and improve eyesight.¹³ Previous studies have shown that Dendrobium plants produce many classes of secondary metabolites with interesting biological activities, including antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, antifungal, antiherpetic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, neuroprotective, immunomodulatory, and antiplatelet aggregation activities, as well as inhibition of lymphocyte infiltration and apoptosis in Sjogren’s syndrome.¹⁴

Over the years, we have been working on several plants in the genus Dendrobium and found that some possess outstanding α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, for instance, loddigesiinols G-J from Dendrobium loddigesii,¹⁵ 5-methoxy-7-hydroxy-9,10-dihydro-1,4-phenanthrenequinone from Dendrobium formosum,¹⁶ and dendrofalconerol A from Dendrobium tortile.¹⁷ Besides, some phenolic compounds with glucose uptake stimulatory activity from D. formosum have been reported.¹⁶

Dendrobium christyanum Rchb.f. is a small epiphytic plant, widely distributed in Thailand, Vietnam, and Southwest China. “Ueang Sae Phukradueng” is the name in Thai.¹⁸ The occurrence of D. christyanum is more abundant than at higher elevations, usually above 5900 ft.¹⁹ Before the present investigation, neither chemical nor biological studies have been reported for this plant.

In the preliminary evaluation, a methanolic extract of D. christyanum at 100 µg/mL exhibited α-glucosidase inhibitory activity by more than 70%. At 10 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL, it enhanced glucose uptake by L6 myotubes by 34.5% ± 51.7% and 56.4% ± 19.7%, respectively. These observations encouraged us to perform a detailed investigation of this plant to find the compounds responsible for the biological activities. The results from this study constitute the first report of glucosidase inhibitory and glucose uptake stimulatory activities of D. christyanum and its active principles.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and Structural Analysis

General experimental procedures

Vacuum-liquid column chromatography (VLC) and column chromatography were conducted on silica gel 60 (Merck, Kieselgel 60, 70-320 µm and 230-400 µm). Gel filtration chromatography was performed on Sephadex LH-20 (25-100 µm, GE Healthcare). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance DPX-300 FT-NMR spectrometer or a Bruker Avance III HD 500 spectrometer (Bruker Biosciences Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Mass spectral data were analyzed using a Bruker micro TOF electrospray ionization-mass spectrometer (ESI-MS).

Plant material

Samples of D. christyanum were purchased from Jatuchak market, Bangkok, in July 2015. Plant identification was done by one of the authors (B. Sritularak) and compared with the database of the Botanical Garden Organization. A voucher specimen (BS-DC-072558) has been deposited at the herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University.

Extraction and isolation

The root parts of air-dried plants (0.5 kg) were chopped and extracted with MeOH (3 × 6 L) at room temperature, and then, the organic solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to give a dried mass (36.1 g). The MeOH extract was fractionated by VLC on silica gel (hexane–dichloromethane [CH₂Cl₂] and CH₂Cl₂–MeOH, gradient) to give 5 fractions (A–E). Fraction A (479 mg) was separated by column chromatography (CC, silica gel hexane-acetone, gradient) to give 5 fractions (AI–AV). Fraction AII (155.2 mg) was separated by Sephadex LH-20 (CH₂Cl₂) and then by CC (silica gel, hexane–acetone, gradient) to obtain methyl haematommate (1) (4 mg). Fractions AIII (138.9 mg) and AIV (38.6 mg) were purified on Sephadex LH-20 (acetone) to yield n-eicosyl trans-ferulate (2) (109 mg) and methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate (3) (5.9 mg), respectively. Fraction B (2.4 g) was fractionated by CC (silica gel, hexane-acetone, gradient) to give 17 fractions (BI–BXVII). Fraction BIV (348.8 mg) was purified on Sephadex LH-20 (CH₂Cl₂) to furnish n-docosyl 4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamate (4) (40.6 mg). Fraction BVIII (179.7 mg) was separated on Sephadex LH-20 (CH₂Cl₂) to get vanillin (5) (29.1 mg). Fraction BIX (198.5 mg) was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 (CH₂Cl₂) to give 12 fractions (BIX1–BIX12). Fraction BIX7 (17.7 mg) was purified by CC (silica gel; hexane–acetone, gradient) to give coniferyl aldehyde (6) (13.7 mg). 4,5-Dihydroxy-2-methoxy-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (7) (20.8 mg) was obtained from fraction BIX10 (190.5 mg) after purification on Sephadex LH-20 (CH₂Cl₂). Fraction BX (556.7 mg) was separated on Sephadex LH-20 (CH₂Cl₂) to give 9 fractions (BX1–BX9). Moscatilin (8) (25.6 mg) was obtained from fraction BX2 (90.8 mg) after separation by CC (silica gel, hexane-acetone, gradient). Aloifol I (9) (215.6 mg) was isolated from fraction BX3 (361 mg) by CC (silica gel; hexane–acetone, gradient). Fraction C (1.7 g) was fractionated by CC (silica gel; dichloromethane–acetone, gradient) to yield 10 fractions (CI–CX). Fraction CVII (50.9 mg) was subjected to CC (silica gel, hexane–acetone, gradient) to yield gigantol (10) (3.3 mg). Fraction CIX (260 mg) was separated on Sephadex LH-20 (acetone) and then further purified by CC (silica gel, hexane–acetone, gradient) to give batatasin III (11) (49.8 mg). Fraction CX (884.9 mg) was fractionated by CC (silica gel, hexane–acetone, gradient) to give 13 fractions (CX1–CX13). Fraction CX9 (57.7 mg) was further purified by CC (silica gel, hexane–acetone, gradient) and then by Sephadex LH-20 (acetone) to afford dendrosinen B (12) (19.1 mg). Fraction E (15.2 g) was separated on Diaion HP-20 (water (H₂O)–MeOH, gradient) to give 5 fractions (EI–EV). Fraction EII (1.47 g) was separated (C18, acetonitrile–H₂O, gradient) and then further purified by CC (silica gel, hexane–acetone, gradient) to give diorcinolic acid (13) (7.1 mg).

α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

α-Glucosidase inhibition assay was carried out by following the method in the previous report by Inthongkaew et al.¹⁶ α-Glucosidase inhibition was determined by observing the release of p-nitrophenol from the substrate p-nitrophenol-α-d-glucopyranoside. Acarbose was used as a positive control.

Glucose Uptake Stimulation Assay

Glucose uptake stimulation assay was performed according to the method by Inthongkaew et al.¹⁶ Insulin (500 nM) and metformin (2 mM) were used as positive controls, and the differentiation medium containing 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide was used as a negative control.

Cell Viability Assay

Cell viability in each well was evaluated promptly after the determination of glucose uptake in L6 cells. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay method was used to determine the cytotoxicity of each test compound.²⁰

Statistical Analysis

The results of glucose uptake stimulation and cytotoxicity assays were described as the mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance was performed using the GraphPad Prism Version 7.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The statistical analysis for evaluating the significance of the difference between means is performed by the incorrect Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Isolation, Characterization, and Chemical Structures of Isolated Compounds

In this study, chromatographic separation of the MeOH extract of D. christyanum root led to the isolation of 13 compounds which included methyl haematommate (1),²¹ n-eicosyl trans-ferulate (2),²² methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate (3),²³ n-docosyl 4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamate (4),²⁴ vanillin (5),²⁵ coniferyl aldehyde (6),²⁶ 4,5-dihydroxy-2-methoxy-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (7),²⁷ moscatilin (8),²⁸ aloifol I (9),²⁹ gigantol (10),³⁰ batatasin III (11),³¹ dendrosinen B (12),³² and diorcinolic acid (13)³³ (Figure 1). The structures of these isolates were determined by comparing their ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and MS data with literature values (see supplemental material).

Figure 1

Structures of isolated compounds.

Compounds 1, 3, and 13 were frequently found in lichens,^34,35 but 3 was also obtained from a higher plant named Pygeum africanum.³⁶ The phenolics 2 and 4 were esters of ferulic acid and cinnamic acid, respectively. Compounds 8-12 were identified as stilbenes and compound 7 as a phenanthrene derivative. All of the isolates 1-13 were then evaluated for α-glucosidase inhibition and glucose uptake stimulation activities.

α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity of the Compounds

In the assays for α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, we evaluated each compound at 100 µg/mL. Only 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, and 13 exhibited more than 70% inhibition and, thus, were further analyzed for half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values. All of them showed stronger activity than acarbose, as evidenced by their lower IC₅₀ values (Table 1). The α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of methyl haematommate (1) and diorcinolic acid (13) were reported for the first time in this study whereas those of 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 were described earlier.^37,38

Table 1

IC₅₀ Values of Compounds 1-13 Against α-Glucosidase Enzyme.

Compounds	IC₅₀ (µM)	IC₅₀ (µg/mL)
Methyl haematommate (1)	18.67 ± 2.06	3.925 ± 0.43
n-Eicosyl trans-ferulate (2)	NA	NA
Methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate (3)	47.76 ± 3.33	9.37 ± 0.65
n-Docosyl 4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamate (4)	4.61 ± 0.24	2.18 ± 0.11
Vanillin (5)	NA	NA
Coniferyl aldehyde (6)	66.39 ± 4.7	11.83 ± 0.85
4,5-Dihydroxy-2-methoxy -9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (7)	133.11 ± 10.82	32.25 ± 2.62
Moscatilin (8)	NA	NA
Aloifol I (9)	NA	NA
Gigantol (10)	79.87 ± 14.20	21.91 ± 3.89
Batatasin III (11)	NA	NA
Dendrosinen B (12)	NA	NA
Diorcinolic acid (13)	31.79 ± 2.42	10.12 ± 0.77
Acarbose (positive control)	724.74 ± 46	467.90 ± 29.72

IC₅₀, half-maximal inhibitory concentration.

NA means no inhibitory activity.

Compound 4 displayed potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, but 2 was devoid of such activity, despite their structural similarity. Other research groups have also reported several esters of trans-cinnamic acid derivatives as strong AGIs.^39,40 On the other hand, studies revealed that trans-tetracosylferulate and cis-docosylferulate and cis-tetracosylferulate from D. tortile and D. scarbrilingue ^17,37 did not possess α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. It appears that the presence of the MeO group in the aromatic ring might cause the loss of activity in the ferulic acid esters.

Glucose Uptake Stimulatory Activity of the Compounds

In the study for the glucose uptake stimulatory effect, we evaluated all compounds, except for 1 and 10 because of their inadequate quantity, using rat L6 myotubes as the test model.⁴¹ Each compound was first screened for cytotoxicity at 3 different concentrations (1, 10, and 100 µg/mL) (Figure 2(a)). Percentages of cell viability above 80% were considered as non-cytotoxicity.⁴² The sample was then evaluated for glucose uptake stimulatory activity at non-toxic concentrations, as shown in Table 2. When tested at 100 µg/mL, n-docosyl 4- hydroxyl-trans-cinnamate (4) (0.212 mM), vanillin (5) (0.657 mM), and coniferyl aldehyde (6) (0.561 mM) enhanced glucose uptake by L6 myotubes by 31.6% ± 4.4%, 97.1% ± 8.7%, and 56.4% ± 2.5%, respectively, without toxicity. Furthermore, aloifol (9) (0.036 mM) and batatasin III (11) at 10 µg/mL (0.041 mM) showed enhancement of 11.3% ± 2.5% and 30.2% ± 6.7%, respectively. (Figure 2(b)). In a previous report, gigantol (10) showed noticeable glucose uptake stimulation activity but it was cytotoxic to the cells.¹⁶

Figure 2

Cytotoxicity (a) and glucose uptake stimulatory activity (b) of extract and isolated compounds.

Table 2

Glucose Uptake Stimulation of Dendrobium christyanum.

	Glucose uptake (%)	Enhancement (%)
DMSO	100	0
Metformin (2 mM)	207.3 ± 9.1^a	107.3 ± 9.1
Insulin (500 nM)	192.7 ± 13.1^a	92.7 ± 13.1
MeOH extract
1 µg/mL	105.5 ± 11.5	NA
10 µg/mL	134.5 ± 51.7^a	34.5 ± 51.7
100 µg/mL	156.4 ± 19.7^a	56.4 ± 19.7
n-Eicosyl trans-ferulate (2)
1 µg/mL (0.002 mM)	88.0 ± 24.3	NA
10 µg/mL (0.021 mM)	109.8 ± 4.4	NA
100 µg/mL (0.211 mM)	117.1 ± 5.0	NA
Methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6- dimethylbenzoate (3)
1 µg/mL (0.005 mM)	64.7 ± 6.7	NA
10 µg/mL (0.051 mM)	82.2 ± 14.0	NA
100 µg/mL (0.510 mM)	NT	NA
n-Docosyl 4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamate (4)
1 µg/mL (0.002 mM)	32.7 ± 2.5	NA
10 µg/mL (0.021 mM)	56.0 ± 19.7	NA
100 µg/mL (0.212 mM)	131.6 ± 4.4^a	31.6 ± 4.4
Vanillin (5)
1 µg/mL (0.006 mM)	77.8 ± 27.7	NA
10 µg/mL (0.066 mM)	92.4 ± 7.6	NA
100 µg/mL (0.657 mM)	197.1 ± 8.7^a	97.1 ± 8.7
Coniferyl aldehyde (6)
1 µg/mL (0.005 mM)	88.0 ± 7.6	NA
10 µg/mL (0.056 mM)	90.9 ± 20.2	NA
100 µg/mL (0.561 mM)	156.4 ± 2.5^a	56.4 ± 2.5
4,5-Dihydroxy-2-methoxy -9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (7)
1 µg/mL (0.004 mM)	72.0 ± 9.1	NA
10 µg/mL (0.041 mM)	79.3 ± 4.4	NA
100 µg/mL (0.413 mM)	118.5 ± 15.1	NA
Moscatilin (8)
1 µg/mL (0.003 mM)	76.4 ± 13.3	NA
10 µg/mL (0.033 mM)	79.3 ± 4.4	NA
100 µg/mL (0.329 mM)	108.4 ± 2.5	NA
Aloifol I (9)
1 µg/mL (0.003 mM)	66.2 ± 20.0	NA
10 µg/mL (0.036 mM)	111.3 ± 2.5	11.3 ± 2.5
100 µg/mL (0.365 mM)	NT	NA
Batatasin III (11)
1 µg/mL (0.004 mM)	117.1 ± 18.2	NA
10 µg/mL (0.041 mM)	130.2 ± 6.7	30.2 ± 6.7
100 µg/mL (0.409 mM)	NT	NA
Dendrosinen B (12)
1 µg/mL (0.004 mM)	44.4 ± 0.0	NA
10 µg/mL (0.038 mM)	54.5 ± 2.5	NA
100 µg/mL (0.384 mM)	NT	NA
Diorcinolic acid (13)
1 µg/mL (0.003 mM)	69.1 ± 6.7	NA
10 µg/mL (0.031 mM)	70.5 ± 34.9	NA
100 µg/mL (0.314 mM)	74.9 ± 11.5	NA

NT, not tested due to toxicity; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; NA, not applicable.

^a P < 0.05 significantly different when compared with the control (DMSO).

The hypoglycemic potentials of vanillic acid and coniferyl aldehyde warrant close attention. In an earlier report, vanillic acid showed enhancement of glucose uptake by L6 myotubes and displayed synergistic effects with metformin and 2,4-thiazolidinedione.⁴³ In a separate study, coniferyl aldehyde could reduce the plasma glucose concentration in streptozotocin-induced male diabetic Wistar rats.⁴⁴ Interestingly, in the current investigation, vanillin (5) and coniferyl aldehyde (6) showed potent glucose uptake stimulatory activity. The findings in this study may help to understand the mechanisms of action underlying the hypoglycemic effects expressed by these phytophenolic compounds. Experiments in animals are suggested to confirm this postulation.

Conclusion

Chromatographic separation of D. christyanum root extract led to the isolation of 13 compounds (1-13). n-Docosyl 4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamate (4) exhibited potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with an IC₅₀ value of 4.61 ± 0.24 µM. Moreover, 6 other compounds also showed higher α-glucosidase inhibitory activity than the drug acarbose (724.74 ± 46 µM): methyl haematommate (1) (18.67 ± 2.06 µM), methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate (3) (47.76 ± 3.33 µM), coniferyl aldehyde (6) (66.39 ± 4.7 µM), 4,5-dihydroxy-2-methoxy-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (7) (133.11 ± 10.82 µM), gigantol (10) (79.87 ± 14.20 µM), and diorcinolic acid (13) (31.79 ± 2.42 µM). Furthermore, at the concentration of 100 µg/mL, n-docosyl 4-hydroxyl-trans-cinnamate (4) (0.212 mM), vanillin (5) (0.657 mM), and coniferyl aldehyde (6) (0.561 mM) could enhance the glucose uptake by rat L6 myotubes by 31.6% ± 4.4%, 97.1% ± 8.7%, and 56.4% ± 2.5%, respectively, without toxicity. Herein, 4 and 6 displayed strong activity in both assays, suggesting their promising antidiabetic potential. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report for phytochemical constituents and α-glucosidase inhibitory and glucose uptake stimulatory activities of the root of D. christyanum.

Supplemental Material

Supplementary material - Supplemental material for α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Glucose Uptake Stimulatory Effects of Phenolic Compounds From Dendrobium christyanum

Supplemental material, Supplementary material, for α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Glucose Uptake Stimulatory Effects of Phenolic Compounds From Dendrobium christyanum by Htoo Tint San, Panitch Boonsnongcheep, Waraporn Putalun, Wanwimon Mekboonsonglarp, Boonchoo Sritularak and Kittisak Likhitwitayawuid in Natural Product Communications

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

HTS is grateful to the Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University for a CU-ASEAN PhD scholarship.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Waraporn Putalun

Boonchoo Sritularak

References

Nathan

DM.

Genuth

Lachin

et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986.doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291401

Wilcox

. Insulin and insulin resistance. Clin Biochem Rev. 2005;26(2):19-39.

Hakamata

Kurihara

Okuda

Nishio

Oku

. Design and screening strategies for alpha-glucosidase inhibitors based on enzymological information. Curr Top Med Chem. 2009;9(1):3-12.doi:10.2174/156802609787354306

Yin

Zhang

Feng

Zhang

Kang

. α-Glucosidase inhibitors isolated from medicinal plants. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2014;3(3-4):136-174.doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2014.11.003

Bischoff

. Pharmacology of alpha-glucosidase inhibition. Eur J Clin Invest. 1994;24(S3):3-10.

Balfour

JA.

Wilde

. Management of type 2 diabetes: defining the role of acarbose. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 1997;2(5):248-260.

Hollander

. Safety profile of acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor. Drugs. 1992;44(3):47-53.doi:10.2165/00003495-199200443-00007

Lee

MS.

Thuong

. Stimulation of glucose uptake by triterpenoids from Weigela subsessilis . Phytother Res. 2010;24(1):49-53.doi:10.1002/ptr.2865

Panidthananon

Chaowasku

Sritularak

Likhitwitayawuid

. A new benzophenone C-Glucoside and other constituents of Pseuduvaria fragrans And their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1600.doi:10.3390/molecules23071600

10.

Scarpello

JHB.

Howlett

HCS

. Metformin therapy and clinical uses. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008;5(3):157-167.doi:10.3132/dvdr.2008.027

11.

Farland

MZ.

McPheeters

CM.

Renwick

et al. Comparison of patients receiving long-term metformin therapy and vitamin B₁₂ monitoring. J Pharm Technol. 2015;31(4):184-189.doi:10.1177/8755122515576207

12.

Seidenfaden

. Orchid genera in Thailand XII, Dendrobium Sw. Opera Bot. 1985;83:1-295.

13.

Fan

Dong

Miao

Zhou

. Chemical components of Dendrobium chrysotoxum . Chin J Chem. 2012;30(6):1327-1330.doi:10.1002/cjoc.201100670

14.

Lam

TB.

Yao

et al. Evaluation of chemical constituents and important mechanism of pharmacological biology in Dendrobium plants. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015(1):1-25.doi:10.1155/2015/841752

15.

Kuang

G-P

et al. Loddigesiinols G-J: α-glucosidase inhibitors from Dendrobium loddigesii . Molecules. 2014;19(6):8544-8555.doi:10.3390/molecules19068544

16.

Inthongkaew

Chatsumpun

Supasuteekul

et al. α-Glucosidase and pancreatic lipase inhibitory activities and glucose uptake stimulatory effect of phenolic compounds from Dendrobium formosum . Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2017;27(4):480-487.doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2017.05.005

17.

Limpanit

Chuanasa

Likhitwitayawuid

Jongbunprasert

Sritularak

. α-Glucosidase inhibitors from Dendrobium tortile . Rec Nat Prod. 2016;10(5):609-616.

18.

Smitinand

. Thai Plant Names, (Revised Edition). Bangkok: The Forest Herbarium, Royal Forest Department; 2001.

19.

Averyanov

LV.

Christenson

. Orchids of vietnam. Dendrobium christyanum. The requirements of a miniature cool-growing Dendrobium . Orchids - The Magazine of the American Orchids Society. 1998;67(11):1148-1149.

20.

Riss

Moravec

Niles

et al. Cell Viability Assays. Assay Guidance Manual. Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2013.

21.

Duong

TH.

Huynh

BLC.

Ton

TQ.

Nguyen

KPP

. Some phenolic compounds of the lichen Parmotrema planatilobatum (Hale) Hale (Parmeliaceae). J Sci Technol Dev. 2011;14(6):5-10.

22.

Baldé

AM.

Claeys

Pieters

LA.

Wray

Vlietinck

. Ferulic acid esters from stem bark of Pavetta owariensis . Phytochemistry. 1991;30(3):1024-1026.doi:10.1016/0031-9422(91)85302-G

23.

Wang

X-ning.

W-tao.

Lou

H-xiang.

Wang

Lou

. Antifungal constituents from the Chinese moss Homalia trichomanoides . Chem Biodivers. 2005;2(1):139-145.doi:10.1002/cbdv.200490165

24.

Chowdhury

Hasan

AA.

Tareq

FS.

Ahsan

Azam

ATMZ.

Azam

. 4-Hydroxy-trans-cinnamate derivatives and triterpene from Barleria cristata . Dhaka Univ J Pharm Sci. 2013;12(2):143-145.doi:10.3329/dujps.v12i2.17623

25.

Ito

Chang

FR.

Wang

et al. Anti-AIDS agents. 48.(1) Anti-HIV activity of moronic acid derivatives and the new melliferone-related triterpenoid isolated from Brazilian propolis . J Nat Prod. 2001;64(10):1278-1281.doi:10.1021/np010211x

26.

Carpinella

MC.

Giorda

LM.

Ferrayoli

CG.

Palacios

. Antifungal effects of different organic extracts from Melia azedarach L. on phytopathogenic fungi and their isolated active components. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(9):2506-2511.doi:10.1021/jf026083f

27.

Matsuda

Morikawa

Xie

Yoshikawa

. Antiallergic phenanthrenes and stilbenes from the tubers of Gymnadenia conopsea . Planta Med. 2004;70(9):847-855.doi:10.1055/s-2004-827234

28.

Klongkumnuankarn

Busaranon

Chanvorachote

Sritularak

Jongbunprasert

Likhitwitayawuid

. Cytotoxic and antimigratory activities of phenolic compounds from Dendrobium brymerianum . Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:1-9.doi:10.1155/2015/350410

29.

Juneja

RK.

Sharma

SC.

Tandon

. Two substituted bibenzyls and a dihydrophenanthrene from Cymbidium aloifolium . Phytochemistry. 1987;26(4):1123-1125.doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82362-6

30.

Chen

et al. Cytotoxic phenolics from Bulbophyllum odoratissimum . Food Chem. 2008;107(1):169-173.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.077

31.

Majumder

PL.

Roychowdhury (Née Basak)

Chakraborty

. Bibenzyl derivatives from the orchid Bulbophyllum protractum . Phytochemistry. 1997;44(1):167-172.doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00402-5

32.

Chen

X-J.

Mei

W-L.

Cai

C-H.

Guo

Z-K.

Song

X-Q.

Dai

H-F

. Four new bibenzyl derivatives from Dendrobium sinense . Phytochem Lett. 2014;9:107-112.doi:10.1016/j.phytol.2014.04.012

33.

Duong

. Phenolic compounds from Pamotrema dilatatum growing in Lam Dong province. Sci Tech Dev J. 2019;22(1):114-119.doi:10.32508/stdj.v22i1.1010

34.

Huneck

Yoshimura

. Identification of Lichen Substances. Berlin: Springer; 1996.

35.

Bourgeois

Suire

Vivas

Vitry

. Atraric acid, a marker for epiphytic lichens in the wood used in cooperage: Identification and quantification by GC/MS/(MS). Analusis. 1999;27(3):281-283.doi:10.1051/analusis:1999100

36.

Schleich

Papaioannou

Baniahmad

Matusch

. Activity-guided isolation of an antiandrogenic compound of Pygeum africanum . Planta Med. 2006;72(6):547-551.doi:10.1055/s-2006-941472

37.

Sarakulwattana

Mekboonsonglarp

Likhitwitayawuid

Rojsitthisak

Sritularak

. New bisbibenzyl and phenanthrene derivatives from Dendrobium scabrilingue and their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. Nat Prod Res. 2018:1-8.doi:10.1080/14786419.2018.1527839

38.

Karunaratne

Thadhani

VM.

Khan

SN.

Choudhary

. Potent α-glucosidase inhibitors from the lichen Cladonia species from Sri Lanka. J Natl Sci Found. 2014;42(1):95-98.doi:10.4038/jnsfsr.v42i1.6684

39.

Adisakwattana

Sookkongwaree

Roengsumran

et al. Structure-Activity relationships of trans-cinnamic acid derivatives on alpha-glucosidase inhibition. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004;14(11):2893-2896.doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.03.037

40.

Ernawati

Radji

Hanafi

Mun’im

Yanuar

. Cinnamic acid derivatives as α-glucosidase inhibitor agents. Indones. J. Chem.. 2017;17(1):151-160.doi:10.22146/ijc.23572

41.

Mitsumoto

Burdett

Grant

Klip

. Differential expression of the GLUT1 and GLUT4 glucose transporters during differentiation of L6 muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;175(2):652-659.doi:10.1016/0006-291X(91)91615-J

42.

ISO 10993-5:2009(E) . Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Part 5: Tests for Cytotoxicity: In Vitro Methods . 3rd ed. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization

43.

Prabhakar

PK.

Doble

. Interaction of phytochemicals with hypoglycemic drugs on glucose uptake in L6 myotubes. Phytomedicine. 2011;18(4):285-291.doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2010.06.016

44.

Subash Babu

Prabuseenivasan

Ignacimuthu

. Cinnamaldehyde-a potential antidiabetic agent. Phytomedicine. 2007;14(1):15-22.doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2006.11.005

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.42 MB

0.00 MB