Daily medical practice in the United States is at the threshold of a significant and permanent change. The driving force is technologies that permit remote physiological monitoring of patients who have diabetes and other chronic diseases, along with widespread access to the Internet and the adoption of email as a primary means of communicating in our society. Utilization of these technologies not only improves the quality of patient care, it also reduces the need for frequent physician office appointments, costly emergency room visits, and unnecessary hospitalizations. The Remote Monitoring Access Act of 2007 will eliminate disincentives in current Medicare rules that only provide payment for face-to-face meetings between patients and their doctors.
ChengD.Prevalence, predisposition and prevention of type II diabetes. Nutr Metab (Lond).2005 Oct 18; 2: 29.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2003. 2003 [cited 2007 March 22]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet.htm.
3.
NarayanKMBoyleJPThompsonTJSorensenSWWilliamsonDF.Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA.2003 Oct 8; 290 (14): 1884–90.
4.
BondGEBurrRWolfFMPriceMMcCurrySMTeriL.The effects of a web-based intervention on the physical outcomes associated with diabetes among adults age 60 and older: a randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther.2007 Feb; 9 (1): 52–9.
5.
McMahonG.Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care.2005 Jul; 28 (7): 1624–9.
6.
ChoJHChangSAKwonHSChoiYHKoSHMoonSDYooSJSongKHSonHSKimHSLeeWCChaBYSonHYYoonKH.Long-term effect of the Internet-based glucose monitoring system on HbA1c reduction and glucose stability: a 30-month follow-up study for diabetes management with a ubiquitous medical care system. Diabetes Care.2006 Dec; 29 (12): 2625–31.
7.
MurataGHShahJHHoffmanRMWendelCSAdamKDSolvasPABokhariSUDuckworthWC, Intensified blood glucose monitoring improves glycemic control in stable, insulin-treated veterans with type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study (DOVES). Diabetes Care.2003 Jun; 26 (6): 1759–63.
8.
MontoriVMHelgemoePKGuyattGHDeanDSLeungTWSmithSASmithSAKudvaYC.Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care.2004 May; 27 (5): 1088–94.
9.
McMahonGTGomesHEHohneS HicksonHuTMLevineBAConlinPR.Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care.2005 Jul; 28 (7): 1624–9.
10.
PietteJDWeinbergerMKraemerFBMcPheeSJ.Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care.2001 Feb; 24 (2): 202–8.
11.
TanenbergRBodeBLaneWLevetanCMestmanJHarmelAPTobianJGrossTMastrototaroJ.Use of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to guide therapy in patients with insulin-treated diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc.2004 Dec; 79 (12): 1521–6.
12.
ChinT, Big sites enter into diabetes monitoring market: companies offer millions of patients the means to manage chronic conditions over the Internet. American Medical News.2003 Sept. 22/29.
13.
Editor's Corner. FierceHealthIT.2006 Nov 6.
14.
Sarasohn-KahnJ.Mixed signals for remote monitoring. IHealthBeat.2006 Apr 26.
15.
CarpenterD, Reinventing the house call, Web-enabled health monitoring is a hit at home, but questions regarding reimbursement and other issues cloud its potential. Health Forum Journal Magazine Winter 2003.
16.
Strategic Healthcare Programs/HomMed. Independent Analysis of monitored/Non-Monitored Patients. Jan 1, 2002-Mar 31, 2004.
17.
New England Healthcare Institute. Remote physiological monitoring: innovation in the management of heart failure, NEHI Series.
