The present study sought to determine the extent to which participation in a post-secondary honors program affected academic achievement. Archival data were collected on three cohorts of high-achieving students at a large public university. Propensity scores were calculated on factors predicting participation in honors and used as the covariate. The Johnson–Neyman technique was used to determine the values of the covariate on which the groups differed. The effect of participating in honors was greater for smaller propensity scores. The findings offer a positive outcome associated with participation for students at the lower end of the propensity score continuum, providing evidence to conclude that such programs are beneficial to a subset of high-achieving students.
AblardK.LipschultzR. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94-101. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.94
2.
AchterbergC. (2005). What is an honors student?Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 6, 75-83.
3.
AstinA. (1978). Four critical years. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AstinA. (1993). What matters in college?San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
AustinP. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 300-424.
6.
BaconD.BeanB. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 35-42. doi:10.1177/0273475305284638
7.
BaltesP. (1968). Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generation effects. Human Development, 11, 145-171.
8.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
9.
BloomB. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
10.
BlytheH. (2004). Ethics on an honors college campus: An analysis of attitudes and behaviors of honors versus non-honors students. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 5, 25-35.
11.
BordeS. (1998). Predictors of student academic performance in the introductory marketing course. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 302.
12.
BurkeJ.ModarresiS. (2001). Performance funding programs: Assessing their stability. Research in Higher Education, 42, 51-70.
13.
ButlerJ.PryorB.MartiS. (2004). Communication apprehension and honors students. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 293-296.
14.
CampbellD.StanleyJ.GageN. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
CampbellK. (2005). Allocation of resources: Should honors programs take priority?Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 6, 95-103.
16.
Castro-JohnsonM.WangA. (2003). Emotional intelligence and academic performance of college honors and non-honors freshmen. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 4, 105-114.
17.
ChapmanK.DavisR.ToyD.WrightL. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 236-249.
18.
ChaseC.HemmeterJ.GriffinN. (1971). Grade point averages: Honors vs. non-honors courses (Indiana Studies in Prediction, No. 15). Bloomington: Bureau of Educational Studies and Testing, Indiana University.
19.
CosgroveJ. (2004). The impact of honors programs on undergraduate academic performance, retention, and graduation. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 5, 45-53.
20.
D’AlonzoK. (2004). The Johnson-Neyman procedure as an alternative to ANCOVA. West Journal of Nursing Research, 26, 804-812.
21.
DorseyS.SoekenK. (1996). Use of the Johnson-Neyman procedure as an alternative to analysis of covariance. Nursing Research, 45, 363-366.
22.
DuckworthA. (2006). Intelligence is not enough: Non-IQ predictors of achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 1741.
23.
ElliotA. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In ElliotA.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford.
24.
GiazzoniM.HilbergN. (2009). Dealing with subjective and objective issues in honors education. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 10, 57-59.
25.
HartleroadG. E. (2005). Comparison of the academic achievement of first-year female honors program and non-honors program engineering students. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 6, 109-120.
26.
HébertT.McBeeM. (2007). The impact of an undergraduate honors program on gifted university students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 136-151.
27.
HiteR.McIntyreF.LynchD. (2001). The impact of student characteristics on cooperative testing in the marketing classroom. Marketing Education Review, 11, 27-34.
28.
HoxbyC.AveryC. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students (Working Paper No. 18586). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29.
HuitemaB. (2011). The analysis of covariance and alternatives: Statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
30.
JaramilloF.SpectorP. (2004). The effect of action orientation on the academic performance of undergraduate marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 250-260. doi:10.1177/0273475304268780.
31.
JarvikL.FalekA. (1963). Intellectual stability and survival in the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 18, 173-176.
32.
JohnsonP.NeymanJ. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57-93.
33.
KarakayaF.AinscoughT.ChopoorianJ. (2001). The effects of class size and learning style on student performance in a multimedia-based marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 84.
34.
KellerR.LacyM. (2013). Propensity score analysis of an honors program’s contribution to students’ retention and graduation outcomes. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 13, 73-84.
35.
KeppelG.WickensD. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
36.
McDermottD. (1989). College honors programs foster elitism and threaten morale. Chronicle of Higher Education, 35, B2.
37.
MihelichJ.StorrsD.PellettP. (2007). Transformational experience through liberation pedagogy: A critical look at honors education. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 8, 97-115.
38.
MoonJ. (2012). Honors and high-ability students: Factors that predict academic efficacy, critical thinking skills, and academic goals. Available from Graduate Theses and Dissertations. (Paper 12412)
39.
MoritzB. (2011). Can the elitism of honors help students at non-elite schools?Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 12, 65-67.
40.
MorrisM. (2008). Examining teachers’ beliefs and instructional practices in secondary foreign language classes on honors and non-honors tracks: The role of teaching for communication. Teachers College Record, 110, 1065-1087.
41.
OgilvieK.RezaE. (2009). Business student performance in traditional vs. honors course settings. Business Education Innovation Journal, 1, 31-37.
42.
OshimaT. (2014). QJN.xlsx. Faculty website. Department of Educational Policy Studies, College of Education, Georgia State University. Retrieved from http://coeweb.gsu.edu/coshima/stat3.htm
43.
PedhazurE. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.
44.
PehlkeJ. (2003). The myth of an honors education. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 4, 27-33.
45.
PothoffR. (1964). On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika, 29, 241-256.
46.
RiceK.LeeverB.ChristopherJ.PorterJ. (2006). Perfectionism, stress, and social (dis)
connection: A short-term study of hopelessness, depression, and academic adjustment among honors students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 524-534.
47.
RinnA. (2005). Trends among honors college students: An analysis by year in school. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 157-167.
48.
RinnA. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 232-245.
49.
RinnA.CobaneC. (2009). Elitism misunderstood: In defense of equal opportunity. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 10, 53-56.
50.
RogosaD. (1978). Some results for the Johnson-Neyman procedure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 5366.
51.
RothP.ClarkeR. (1998). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and salary. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 386-400.
52.
SeifertT.PascarellaE.ColangeloN.AssoulineS. (2007). The effects of honors program participation on experiences of good practices and learning outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 57-74.
53.
SelingoJ. (2002). Mission creep?Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, A19-A21.
54.
ShadishW.ClarkM.SteinerP. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1334-1344.
55.
ShushokF. (2002). Educating the best and the brightest: Collegiate honors programs and the intellectual, social and psychological development of students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
56.
ShushokF. (2006). Student outcomes and honors programs: A longitudinal study of 172 honors students, 2000-2004. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 7, 85-96.
57.
SiegleD.RubensteinL.PollardE.RomeyE. (2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 92-101.
58.
SievertW. (1972). College honors programs, accused of elitism, facing crises. Chronicle of Higher Education, 7, 1-5.
59.
SlavinC.ColadarciT.PrattP. (2008). Is student participation in an honors program related to retention and graduation rates?Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 66, 59-69.
60.
SpurrierR. (2009). To the charge of “honors is elitist,” on advice of counsel we plead “guilty as charged.”Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 10, 49-51.
61.
StangorC. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
62.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
63.
TamM.SukhatmeU. (2003). The importance of high school quality in university admissions decisions. College & University, 78, 3-8.
64.
TamM.SukhatmeU. (2004). How to make better college admissions decisions: Considering high school quality and other factors. The Journal of College Admission, 183, 12-16.
65.
TeskeB.EtheridgeB. (2010). Information and communication technology literacy among first-year honors and non-honors students: An assessment. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 11, 83-109.
66.
ThoemmesF.KimE. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90-118.
67.
WeinerN. (2009). Honors is elitist, and what’s wrong with that?Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 10, 19-24.
68.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2011). Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 2.1). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
69.
WoutersS.GermeijsV.ColpinH.VerschuerenK. (2011). Academic self-concept in high school: Predictors and effects on adjustment in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 586-594.
70.
WurstC.SmarkolaC.GaffneyM. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51, 1766-1783.
