The purpose of launching honors programs in Azerbaijan was not only to introduce advanced academic programs but also to change the culture in the universities: to make students more socially active, to encourage them to participate in international competitions, and continue their education. Keeping these goals in mind, we evaluate honors programs by comparing honors students and nonhonors students in respective universities by (a) academic performance, (b) future academic goals, and (c) participation in extracurricular activities. We showed that when we look at academic performance, future academic goals, and some of the extracurricular activities, honors students clearly outperform nonhonors students.
AbizadaA.MirzaliyevaF. (2019). Selection criteria for honors program in Azerbaijan. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 20(2), 69–80. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/638
2.
AstinA. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.
3.
BrohB. A. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic achievement: Who benefits and why?Sociology of Education, 75(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090254
4.
ByrneJ. P. (1998). Honors programs in community colleges: A review of recent issues and literature. Community College Review, 26(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155219802600205
5.
Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better predictor of student performance?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1196
6.
ColemanJ. S. (1961). The adolescent society; the social life of the teenager and its impact on education. Free Press of Glencoe.
7.
CosgroveJ. (2004). The impact of honors programs on undergraduate academic performance, retention, and graduation. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 5(2), 45–54. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/137
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
HansenD. M.LarsonR. W.DworkinJ. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301006
11.
HoldenR. R. (2007). Socially desirable responding does moderate personality scale validity both in experimental and in non-experimental contexts. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 39(3), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjbs2007015
KoolA.MainhardM. T.JaarsmaA. D.BrekelmansM.BeukelenJ. P. (2016). Academic success and early career outcomes: Can honors alumni be distinguished from non-honors alumni?High Ability Studies, 27(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2016.1238818
14.
MarshH. W. (1992). Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.553
MarshH. W.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
17.
PorterA. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Education and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164455
18.
RinnA. N. (2005). Trends among honors college students: An analysis by year in school. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(4), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-479
19.
RinnA. N. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302718
20.
RinnA. N.PluckerJ. A. (2019). High-ability college students and undergraduate honors programs: A systematic review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(3), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219855678
21.
RumbergerR. W.ThomasS. L. (1993). The economic returns to college major, quality and performance: A multilevel analysis of recent graduates. Economics of Education Review, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(93)90040-N
22.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
23.
ShushokF. (2006). Student outcomes and honors programs: A longitudinal study of 172 honors students 2000-2004. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 7(2), 85–96. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/15
24.
ThomasS. L. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns to college quality, major, and academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 281–313. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40196394
25.
ThomsP.McMastersR.RobertsM. R.DombkowskiD. A. (1999). Resume characteristics as predictors of an invitation to interview. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022974232557
VermeulenL.SchmidtH. G. (2008). Learning environment, learning process, academic outcomes and career success of university graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802211810
