Focus Group interviews with 31 disadvantaged students in an Early College High School (ECHS) program present insights to students’ experience in the hybrid school, specifically regarding their perceptions of college readiness. Student “voice” in research can yield significant information when examining aspects of school design that potentially support postsecondary preparation. Three constructs of college readiness were investigated: academic preparedness, social preparedness, and personal preparedness. Themes and subthemes that emerged in data analysis include the following: Readiness with subthemes of Academic Assessment, Autonomy, Discipline, Responsibility, and Management of Time; Learning Community with subthemes of Social Acclimation, Corporate Accountability, and Caring Relationships; Identity with subthemes of Anonymity, Transitional Tensions and Triumphs, Scholarly “Self,” and Mirrored Maturity; and Productivity with subthemes of Future Focus and Delayed Gratification. Findings indicate that the ECHS experience supported students’ acclimation to college-level work and significantly affected their collegiate identity.
AndrewsH. A. (2004). Dual credit research outcomes for students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 415-422.
2.
BarnettE. (2006, January). Helping high school students succeed in college classes (Practice Brief). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University, National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.
3.
BergB. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BootheD.SethnaB. N.StanleyJ. C.ColgateS. D. (1999). Special opportunities for exceptionally able high school students: A description of eight early-college entrance programs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 195-202.
5.
BornT. (2006). Middle and early college high schools: Providing multilevel support and accelerated learning. New Directions for Community Colleges, 135, 49-58.
6.
BrodyL. E.MuratoriM. C.StanleyJ. C. (2004). Early entrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 97-107). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
7.
BrownS.StevenR.TroianoP.SchneiderM. M. (2002). Exploring complex phenomena: Grounded theory in student affairs research. Journal of College Student Development. Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-110447246.html
8.
BurkeP. J.OwensT. J.SerpeR.ThoitsP. A. (2003). Advances in identity theory and research. New York, NY: Springer.
9.
ByrdK. L.McDonaldG. (2005). Defining college readiness from the inside out. Community College Review, 33, 22-37. doi:10.1177/00915521050330010210.1177/009155210503300102
10.
CaplanS. M.HendersonC. E.HendersonJ.FlemingD. L. (2002). Socioemotional factors contributing to the adjustment among early-entrance college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 124-143.
11.
ChemersM. M.HuL.GarciaB. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 55-64.
12.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
13.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.MarronM. M.CastellanoJ. A.ClinkenbeardP. R.RogersK.SmithD. (2010). Guidelines for developing an academic acceleration policy. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 180-203.
14.
ConleyD. T. (2005). College knowledge: What it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
ConleyD. T. (2007). The challenge of college readiness. Educational Leadership, 64, 23-29.
16.
ContrerasF. (2011). Strengthening the bridge to higher education for academically promising underrepresented students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(3), 500-526.
17.
CornellD. G.CallahanC. M.LoydB. H. (1991). Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled prospective study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 135-143.
18.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
DeLaOssaP. (2005). “Hear my voice”: Alternative high school students’ perceptions and implications for school change. American Secondary Education, 31, 24-39.
20.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
DrewS. (2001). Student perceptions of what helps them learn and develop in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 309-331.
EriksonE. H. (1970). Reflections on the dissent of contemporary youth. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51, 11-22.
24.
FarrellT.McDonaldD. M.CarmanC. (2009, October). Are they ready? The early college high school and student self-perceptions of college readiness. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for Teaching and Curriculum, Arlington, VA.
25.
FarrellT.McDonaldD. M.CarmanC. (2010, May). A class of their own: Early college high school students’ self-perceptions of college readiness. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
26.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
27.
GerdesH.MallinckrodtB. (1994). Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72, 281-288.
28.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
29.
GreeneJ. P.ForresterG. (2003). Public high school graduation and college readiness rate in the United States. New York, NY: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
30.
GrossM. U. M.van VlietH. E. (2005). Radical acceleration and early entry to college: A review of the research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 154-171. doi:10.1177/00169862050490020510.1177/001698620504900205
31.
HaggisT.PougetM. (2002). Trying to be motivated: Perspectives on learning from younger students accessing higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 324-336.
32.
HarnishD.LynchR. L. (2005). Secondary to postsecondary technical education transitions: An exploratory study of dual enrollment in Georgia. Career and Technical Education Research, 30, 169-188.
33.
HeilbronnerN. N.ConnellE. E.DobynsS. M.ReisS. M. (2010). The “stepping stone phenomenon”: Exploring the role of positive attrition at an early college entrance program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 392-425.
34.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M.LunneborgC. E. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 495-518.
35.
KirstM.VeneziaA. (2001). Bridging the great divide between secondary school and postsecondary education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 92-97.
36.
KiskerC. (2006). Integrating high school and the community college: Previous efforts and current possibilities. Community College Review, 34, 68-86. doi:10.1177/009155210628982110.1177/0091552106289821
37.
KruegerC. (2006). Dual enrollment: Policy issues confronting state policymakers. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
38.
KulikJ. A. (2004). Meta-analytic studies of acceleration. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 13-22). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
39.
LachatM. A. (2001). Data-driven high school reform: The breaking ranks model. Providence, RI: Brown University.
40.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.PeternelG. (2010). The efficacy of academic acceleration for gifted minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 189-208. doi:10.1177/001698621036925610.1177/0016986210369256
41.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
MaddiS. R.HarveyR. H.KhoshabaD. M.FazelM.ResurreccionN. (2012). The relationship of hardiness and some other relevant variables to college performance. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 52, 190-205.
43.
MarxG. (2006). Sixteen trends, their profound impact on our future: Implications for students, education, communities, and the whole of society. Alexandria, VA: Educational Research Service.
44.
MatthewsP. H.MellomP. J. (2012). Shaping aspirations, awareness, academics, and action: Outcomes of summer enrichment programs for English-learning secondary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(2), 105-124. doi: 10.1177/1932202X1243919710.1177/1932202X12439197.
MorganD. (1993). Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
MuratoriM.ColangeloN.AssoulineS. (2003). Early-entrance students: Impressions of their first semester of college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 219-238.
48.
NobleK. D.ArndtT.NicholsonT.SlettenT.ZamoraA. (1999). Different strokes: Perceptions of social and emotional development among early college entrants. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 77-84.
49.
NobleK. D.ChildersS. A. (2008). A passion for learning: The theory and practice of optimal match at the University of Washington. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 236-270.
50.
NobleK. D.DrummondJ. E. (1992). But what about the prom? Students’ perceptions of early college entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 106-111. doi:10.1177/00169862920360020910.1177/001698629203600209
51.
NobleK. D.VaughanR. C.ChanC.ChildersS.ChowB.FederowA.HughesS. (2007). Love and work: The legacy of early university entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 152-166.
52.
NoddingsN. (2006). Educational leaders as caring teachers. School Leadership & Management, 26, 339-345. doi:10.1080/1363243060088684810.1080/13632430600886848
53.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2002). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 24, 152-157.
54.
PascarellaE. T.WolniakG.PiersonC. T.TerenziniP. T. (2003). Experiences and outcomes of first-generation students in community colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 420-429.
55.
PetersS. J.MannR. L. (2009). Getting ahead: Current secondary and postsecondary acceleration options for high-ability students in Indiana. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 630-657.
56.
PrósperoM.Vohra-GuptaS. (2007). First generation college students: Motivation, integration, and academic achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31, 963-975. doi:10.1080/1066892060090205110.1080/10668920600902051
57.
RajalaJ. (2003). Bridging the gap: Programs for earning college credit in high school. T.H.E. Journal, 31, 25.
58.
Ramos-SanchezL.NicholsL. (2007). Self-efficacy of first-generation and non-first generation college students: The relationship with academic performance and college adjustment. Journal of College Counseling, 10, 6-18.
59.
RiehlR. (1994). The academic preparation, aspirations, and first-year performance of first generation students. College & University, 70, 14-19.
60.
RobbinsS. B.LauverK.LeH.DavisH.LangleyR.CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 231-288.
61.
RobinsonN. M.NobleK. D. (1992). Acceleration: Valuable high school to college options. Gifted Child Today, 15, 20-23.
62.
RogersK. B. (2004). The academic effects of acceleration. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 47-57). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
63.
SchlossbergN. K.LynchA. Q.ChickeringA. W. (1989). Improving higher education environments for adults: Responsive program and services from entry to departure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
SerdyukovP. (2008). Accelerated learning: What is it?Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 1, 35-59.
65.
ShepardS. J.Foley NicponM.DoobayA. F. (2009). Early entrance to college and self-concept: Comparisons across the first semester of enrollment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 40-57.
66.
SiegleD.McCoachD. B. (2008). The first word: A letter from the co-editors on submitting qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 373-375.
67.
StanleyJ. C.BenbowC. P. (1983). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. College & University, 58, 361-369.
68.
StanleyJ. C.McGillA. M. (1986). More about “Young entrants to college: How did they fare?” Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 70-73.
69.
Steenbergen-HuS.MoonS. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39-53. doi:10.1177/001698621038315510.1177/0016986210383155
70.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London, England: Sage.
72.
TapscottD. (2009). Grown up digital. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
73.
TatumB. C. (2010). Accelerated education: Learning on the fast track. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 3, 35-71.
74.
TerenziniP. T.RendonL. I.UpcraftM. L.MillarS. B.AllisonK. W.GreggP. L.JalomoR. (1994). The transition to college: Diverse students, diverse stories. Research in Higher Education, 35, 57-73.
75.
TerenziniP. T.SpringerL.YaegerP.PascarellaE.NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 30, 301-315.
76.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
77.
TintoV. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599-623.
78.
TintoV. (1998). Learning communities: Building gateways to student success. New York, NY: Syracuse University.
79.
TintoV.RussoP.KadelS. (1994). Constructing educational communities: Increasing retention in challenging circumstances. Community College Journal, 64, 26-30.
80.
VialleW.AshtonT.CarlonG.RankinF. (2001). Acceleration: A coat of many colours. Roeper Review, 24, 14-19.
81.
WaitsT.SetzerJ. C.LewisL. (2005). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. public high schools: 2002–03 (NCES 2005–009). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
82.
WellsR.LohmanD.MarronM. (2009). What factors are associated with grade acceleration?Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 248-273.
83.
WilliamsP.HellmanC. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45, 71-82.
84.
WlodkowskiR. (2003). Accelerated learning in colleges and universities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 97, 5-15.
85.
York-AndersonD. C.BowmanS. L. (1991). Assessing the college knowledge of first-generation and second-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 116-122.
86.
ZhaoC.KuhG. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115-138.
87.
ZimbardoP.BoydJ. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York, NY: Free Press.
