Much like first responders, journalists run toward dangerous scenes instead of away from them, often putting themselves at risk. Unlike first responders, there is no research on how a person's risk propensity ties to their career. To gauge if need correlates with risk, as Risk Sensitivity Theory suggests, reporters of various ages and tenures were surveyed on their sensation-seeking levels and propensity to engage in risky behaviors while on the job. According to the results, journalism risk propensity correlated positively with sensation seeking. Risk motivations increase with age and tenure, meaning that older and more experienced journalists are more likely to engage in risky behavior. Males are more risk-prone than females. The research, which was conducted among journalists in the southeastern United States, indicates that hurricane news coverage yields the most positive correlations with sensation seeking, age, and tenure.
AndersonM. L. (2017). American magazines, 1740–1900. In SloanW. D. (Ed.), Media in America: A history (pp. 472). Vision Press.
2.
ArnettJ. (1994). Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90165-1
ByrnesJ. P.MillerD. C.SchaferW. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
5.
CaracoT.MartindaleS.WhittamT. S. (1980). An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Animal Behaviour, 28(3), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80142-4
DesrichardO.DenarieV. (2005). Sensation seeking and negative affectivity as predictors of risky behaviors: A distinction between occasional versus frequent risk-taking. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1449–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.01.011
8.
DiazV. M.NuñoL. E. (2021). Women and policing: An assessment of factors related to the likelihood of pursuing a career as a police officer. Police Quarterly, 24(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211009048
GanellenR. J. (2007). Assessing normal and abnormal personality functioning: Strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701356987
HarrisC.JenkinsM. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men?Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000346
13.
HaydenB. Y.PlattM. L. (2009). Gambling for gatorade: Risk-sensitive decision making for fluid rewards in humans. Animal Cognition, 12(1), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0186-8
14.
KacelnikA.BatesonM. (1997). Risk-sensitivity: Crossroads for theories of decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(8), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01093-0
15.
MillerK. C.KocanS. (2022). Taking to the streets: The effects of in-the-field harassment against journalists covering protests. Journalism Practice, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2157314
MishraS.LalumièreM. L. (2010). You can’t always get what you want: The otivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.009
19.
NicolaouN.ShaneS.CherkasL.SpectorT. D. (2008). The influence of sensation seeking in the heritability of entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.37
20.
RobertiJ. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00067-9
21.
Van VianenA. E.FeijJ. A.KrauszM.TarisR. (2003). Personality factors and adult attachment affecting job mobility. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2003.00249.x
22.
WatersC. W.AmblerR.WatersL. K. (1976). Novelty and sensation seeking in two academic training settings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447603600227
