Does a national norm exist for environment reporters, or do they differ by region? This study used a census approach to examine environmental journalists in four regions of the United States. Across all four regions, these reporters spent much of their time covering nonenvironment stories. They relied more often on local and state sources than on national sources and used a variety of story frames and angles to construct their reporting. In discussing barriers to reporting, they were more likely to cite such issues as time constraints or the size of the news hole rather than interference by editors or advertisers. Most felt the need to remain objective, rejecting calls for advocacy or a civic-journalism approach. The study found more similarities across the regions than differences, suggesting that there is a national norm for covering the environment.
Atwater, T., M. Salwen, and R. B. Anderson. 1985. Media agenda setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quarterly62:393-397.
2.
Cantrill, J. G.1993. Communication and our environment: Categorizing research in environmental advocacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research21:14-14, 15-15, 66-95.
3.
Cohn, V.1990. Reporting on risk. Washington, DC: Media Institute.
Friedman, S. M.1990. Two decades of the environmental beat. Gannett Center Journal4:17-17.
6.
Greenburg, M. R., D. B. Sachsman, P. M. Sandman, and K. L. Salomone. 1989. Network evening news coverage of environmental risk. Risk Analysis9:125-125.
7.
Hansen, A., ed. 1993. The mass media and environmental issues. London: Leicester University Press.
8.
Hornig, S.1990. Science stories: Risk, power and perceived emphasis. Journalism Quarterly67:767-776.
9.
Kafatos, F. C., and T. Eisner. 2004. Unification in the century of biology. Science303:1257-1257.
10.
Krieghbaum, H.1940. The background and training of science writers. Journalism Quarterly17:15-18.
11.
LaFollette, M. C. 2004. Pragmatic popularization: Historical perspectives on media presentation of engineering research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Seattle, WA, February.
12.
Nelkin, D.1995. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: Freeman.
13.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2002. The state of the news media 2002: An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
14.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. The state of the news media 2004: An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/journalist_survey.html.
15.
Sachsman, D. B. 1973. Public relations influence on environmental coverage (in the San Francisco Bay area). Doctoral dissertation, Department of Communication, Stanford University.
16.
Sachsman, D. B.1976. Public relations influence on environmental coverage in the San Francisco area. Journalism Quarterly53:54-60.
17.
Sachsman, D. B., J. Simon, and J. M. Valenti. 2002. The environment reporters of New England. Science Communication23:410-441.
18.
Schwitzer, G.1992. The magical medical media tour. JAMA267:1969-1972.
19.
Singer, E., and P. Endreny. 1987. Reporting hazards: Their benefits and costs. Journal of Communication37:10-27.
20.
Slovic, P.1987. Perceptions of risk. Science236:280-285.
21.
Storad, C. J.1984. Who are the metropolitan daily newspaper science journalists, and how do they work? Newspaper Research Journal6:39-48.
22.
Suzuki, D.2003. A look at world parks. Science301:1289-1289.
23.
Tanner, A. H.2004. Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations: A nationwide survey of local television health reporters. Science Communication25:350-363.
24.
Taylor, C. E., J. Lee, and W. R. Davie. 2000. Local press coverage of environmental conflict. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77:175-192.
25.
Valenti, J. M. 1995. Ethical decision making in environmental journalism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC, August.
26.
Valenti, J. M.1998. Ethical decision making in environmental communication. Journal of Mass Media Ethics13:219-231.
27.
Valenti, J. M.2000. Improving the scientist/journalist conversation. Science and Engineering Ethics6:543-548.
28.
Weaver, D. H., R. A. Beam, B. J. Brownlee, P. S. Voakes, and G. C. Wilhoit. 2005. The American journalist in the 21st century: Key findings. Miami, FL: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. http://www.knightfdn.org/publications/americanjournalist/aj_keyfindings.pdf.
29.
Weaver, D. H., and G. C. Wilhoit. 1996. The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
