In response to economic challenges arising from unforeseen events, cultivating innovation ecosystems is an essential strategy for enhancing economic resilience. This study employs symbiotic theory to clarify and better comprehend the role of innovation ecosystems in economic resilience. To this end, it identifies five essential components of innovation ecosystems and proposes a conceptual model. Panel data fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is utilized in the study to identify how these components combine and contribute to economic resilience. The findings reveal three primary configurations, classified as either platform-dominated or network-dominated. The platform-dominated configuration is favored in the eastern economic zone, while the network-dominated configuration is more prevalent in the central economic zone. Additionally, since the COVID-19 pandemic, innovation platforms and networks have become increasingly important in stimulating economic resilience. This study makes several contributions to the literature: (1) responding to the need for further exploration of economic resilience, especially in the post-epidemic era; (2) improving the theoretical comprehension of how innovation ecosystem components combine and interact to better illustrate economic resilience; (3) offering several innovation combinations that can enhance economic resilience through the application of panel data fsQCA methodology.
AdnerR.KapoorR. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Reexamining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2363
3.
AlexanderA. T.MartinD. P. (2013). Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.013
4.
ArenalA.ArmuñaC.FeijooC. (2020). Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101960
5.
ArgyrisCh.SchönD. A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
6.
BamweyanaI.OkelloD. A.SsengendoR.MazimweA.ZabaliF. (2020). Socio-economic vulnerability to COVID-19: The spatial case of greater Kampala metropolitan area (GKMA). Journal of Geographic Information System, 12(4), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2020.124019
Cabrera-FloresM. R.Peris-OrtizM.Léon-PozoA. (2020). Knowledge, innovation, and outcomes in craft beer: Theoretical framework and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(5), 5369–5378.
10.
ChadeeD.RoxasB. (2013). Institutional environment, innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 9(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422041311299923
11.
DuY.WangQ.ZhouJ. (2023). How does digital inclusive finance affect economic resilience: Evidence from 285 cities in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102709
12.
EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
13.
FettersM. L.GreeneP. G.RiceM. P.ButlerJ. S. (2010). The development of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems. Edward Elgar.
14.
FissP. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
15.
FlorinJ.SchmidtE. (2011). Creating shared value in the hybrid venture arena: A business model innovation perspective. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2011.614631
16.
FreytagP.YoungL. (2014). Introduction to special issue on innovations and networks: Innovation of, within, through and by networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.004
17.
García-PozoA.Marchante-MeraA. J.Campos-SoriaJ. A. (2018). Innovation, environment, and productivity in the spanish service sector: An implementation of a CDM structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.087
18.
Garcia-CastroR.AriñoM. A. (2016). A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research. Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 2(63-76), 526. https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2016.02.06
19.
GoerzenA. (2007). Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.588
20.
IsaksenA.TripplM.MayerH. (2022). Regional innovation systems in an era of grand societal challenges: Reorientation versus transformation. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2125–2138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2084226
21.
JacobidesM. G.CennamoC.GawerA. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
22.
KlimasP.CzakonW. (2022). Gaming innovation ecosystem: Actors, roles and co-innovation processes. Review of Managerial Science, 16(7), 2213–2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00518-8
MartinR.GardinerB. (2019). The resilience of cities to economic shocks: A tale of four recessions (and the challenge of Brexit). The Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 98(4), 1801–1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12430
25.
MartinR.SunleyP. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015
26.
McIntyreD. P.SrinivasanA. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2596
27.
Najafi-TavaniS.Najafi-TavaniZ.NaudéP. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
28.
O'DwyerM.FilieriR.O'MalleyL (2023). Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 900–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2
OskamI.BossinkB.ManA. P. D. (2021). Valuing value in innovation ecosystems: How cross-sector actors overcome tensions in collaborative sustainable business model development. Business & Society, 60(5), 1059–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320907145
31.
PappasI. O.WoodsideA. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
RihouxB.RaginC. C. (2009). Configurational Comparative Methods. Sage.
35.
RitalaP.AgouridasV.AssimakopoulosD. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: A comparative case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 63(3/4), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2013.056900
36.
RouyreA.FernandezA. S.BruyakaO. (2024). Big problems require large collective actions: Managing multilateral coopetition in strategic innovation networks. Technovation, 132, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102968
37.
RuttenR.BoekemaF. (2007). Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74(9), 1834–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.012
38.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
39.
SchumpeterJ. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge.
40.
SirmonD. G.HittM.IrelandR.GilbertB. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
TripplM.FastenrathS.IsaksenA. (2022). Rethinking regional economic resilience: preconditions and processes shaping transformative resilience, GEIST – Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions, GEIST Working Paper series.
43.
VasylievaT.LyulyovO.BilanY.StreimikieneD (2019). Sustainable economic development and greenhouse gas emissions: The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, GDP, and corruption. Energies, 12(17), 3289. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173289
44.
VillaniE.RasmussenE.GrimaldiR. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university-industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004
45.
WolfeD. A.GertlerM. (2016). Growing urban economies: innovation, creating and governance in Canadian city-regions. University of Toronto Press.
