This article is a commentary on how marketing scholarship can be more relevant as it tackles the human development challenges presented by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The commentary argues that as businesses are transforming themselves into purpose-driven organizations, marketing needs to be a part of that transformation. SDG 1 No Poverty and SDG 12 Sustainable Consumption and Production are discussed within the article. The commentary also tackles the institutional barriers that work against path-breaking SDG marketing scholarship: normative promotion and publication expectations along with the practitioner-academic research divide. Without realigning the incentives that reward original, boundary-spanning SDG marketing scholarship, the marketing discipline will be stuck in a cycle of rewarding one behavior while hoping for another.
BoltonR. N. (2020). First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing. AMS Review, 10(3), 172–178.
4.
BoltonR. N. (2021). The convergence of sustainability and marketing: Transforming marketing to respond to a new world. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211005200
5.
BrewerG. D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32(4), 327–337.
6.
ChandyR. K.JoharG. V.MoormanC.RobertsJ. H. (2021). Better marketing for a better world. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 1–9.
7.
ChanS.WeitzN.Persson TrimmerC. (2018). SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production. A review of research needs. Technical annex to the Formas report forskning för agenda, 2030. Översikt av Forskningsbehov och Vägar Framåt, Stockholm Environment Institute.
8.
ConnollyJ.ProtheroA. (2003). Sustainable consumption: Consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse. Consumption Markets and Culture, 6(4), 275–291.
9.
CoulterR. A. (2016). From fragmentation to imagination: Moving to marketing’s next era. AMS Review, 6(3–4), 132–141.
10.
DaviesI.OatesC. J.TynanC.CarriganM.CaseyK.HeathT.HenningerC. E.LichrouM.McDonaghP.McDonaldS.McKechnieS.McLeayF.O’MalleyL.WellsV. (2020). Seeking sustainable futures in marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing, 54, 2911–2939.
11.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
12.
ElkingtonJ. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review, 25, 2–5.
13.
ElkingtonJ. (2020). Green swans: The coming boom in regenerative capitalism. Fast Company Press.
14.
ErgeneS.BanerjeeS. B.HoffmanA. J. (2021). (Un)Sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42, 1319–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937892
15.
FehrerJ. A. (2020). Rethinking marketing: Back to purpose. AMS Review, 10(3), 179–184.
16.
FullertonJ. (2015). Regenerative capitalism. Capital Institute.
17.
GeorgeG.Howard-GrenvilleJ.JoshiA.TihanyiL. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.
18.
GroenM. (2019). Zero growth: A grand challenge for the Asia-Pacific region. Australian Journal of Management, 44(4), 632–647.
19.
GrönroosC. (1994). Quo vadis, marketing? Toward a relationship marketing paradigm. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(5), 347–360.
20.
HaenleinM.BitnerM. J.KohliA. K.LemonK. N.ReibsteinD. J. (2021). Guest editorial: Responsible research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00812-z
21.
HeatonD. P.SchachingerE.LaszloC. (2017). Consciousness development for responsible management education. In SunleyR.LeighJ. (Eds.), Educating for responsible management (pp. 211–232). Routledge.
22.
HeuerM. A.KhalidU.SeuringS. (2020). Bottoms up: Delivering sustainable value in the base of the pyramid. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1605–1616.
23.
HoffmanA. J. (2018). The next phase of business sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal, 16(2), 34–39.
24.
JensenM. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21.
25.
KennedyA. M.McGouranC.KemperJ. A. (2020). Alternative paradigms for sustainability: The Māori worldview. European Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 825–822.
26.
KerrS. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783.
27.
KeyT. M.ClarkT.FerrellO.StewartD. W.PittL. (2020). Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: Opportunities to address marketing’s influence. AMS Review, 10(3), 151–167.
28.
KilbourneW.McDonaghP.ProtheroA. (1997). Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: A macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm.Journal of Macromarketing, 17(1), 4–24.
29.
KilbourneW.MittelstaedtJ. (2012). From profligacy to sustainability: Can we get there from here? In MickD.PettigrewS.PechmannC.OzanneJ. (Eds.), Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being (pp. 283–300). Routledge.
30.
KohliA. K.HaenleinM. (2021). Factors affecting the study of important marketing issues: Implications and recommendations. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 1–11.
31.
KumarV. (2018). Transformative marketing: The next 20 years. Journal of Marketing, 82, 1–12..
32.
LaaschO. (2018). Just old wine in new bottles? Conceptual shifts in the emerging field of responsible management. CRME Working Papers, 4(1), 1–13.
33.
LaaschO.MoosmayerD.AntonacopoulouE.SchalteggerS. (2020). Constellations of transdisciplinary practices: A map and research agenda for the responsible management learning field. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 735–757.
34.
LaczniakG.ShultzC. (2021). Toward a doctrine of socially responsible marketing (SRM): A macro and normative-ethical perspective. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(2), 201–231.
35.
LondonT.JägerU. (2019). Co-creating with the base of the pyramid. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(3), 40–47.
36.
MasonG.RosenbloomA. (2020). Poverty and management education. In MoosmayerD.LaaschO.ParkesC.BrownK. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of responsible management learning and education (pp. 141–164). SAGE Publishing.
37.
MayerC. (2018). Prosperity: Better business makes the greater good. Oxford University Press.
MickD. G.PettigrewS.PechmannC.OzanneJ. L. (2012). Origins, qualities, and envisionments of transformative consumer research. In MickD. G.PettigrewS.PechmannC. C.OzanneJ. L. (Eds.), Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being (pp. 3–24). Routledge.
40.
MilesS.RinghamK. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in marketing. In LindgreenA.MaonF.VanhammeJ.FlorencioB. P.VallasterC.StrongC. (Eds.), Engaging with stakeholders (pp. 188–208). Routledge.
41.
MurphyP. E.SherryJ. F. (Eds.). (2014). Marketing and the common good: Essays from Notre Dame on societal impact. Routledge.
42.
O’BrienT. (2009). Reconsidering the common good in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl. 1), 25–37.
PolonskyM.KilbourneW.VocinoA. (2014). Relationship between the dominant social paradigm, materialism and environmental behaviours in four Asian economies. European Journal of Marketing, 48(3–4), 522–551.
45.
PorterM.KramerM. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–78.
46.
ReibsteinD. J.DayG.WindJ. (2009). Guest editorial: Is marketing academia losing its way?Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 1–3.
47.
RosenbloomA.GudićM.ParkesC.KronbachB. (2017). A PRME response to the challenge of fighting poverty: How far have we come? Where do we need to go now?The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 104–120.
48.
ScheinE. H. (1993). On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 40–51.
49.
ScottK.MartinD. M.SchoutenJ. W. (2014). Marketing and the new materialism. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 282–290.
50.
SkålénP.HackleyC. (2011). Marketing-as-practice. Introduction to the special issue. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27, 189–195.
51.
SnuggsE.JevonsC. (2018). Reconceptualising the scholarship of marketing education–SoME futurescapes. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 26(2), 180–186.
SteinhoffL.PalmatierR. W. (2021). Commentary: Opportunities and challenges of technology in relationship marketing. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 29(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.07.003
54.
SzekelyF.DossaZ. (2017). Beyond the triple bottom line: Eight steps toward a sustainable business model. MIT Press.
55.
TadajewskiM. (2018). Impact factors, journal rankings, interdisciplinary research and ‘the state of the art’ in marketing theory and practice. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(1–2), 1–15.
56.
UNEP. (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. UNEP/Earthprint.
57.
VareyR. J. (2010). Marketing means and ends for a sustainable society: A welfare agenda for transformative change. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 112–126.
58.
ViswanathanM.SreekumarA. (2021). How global marketing can be more global and more marketing: A bottom-up perspective from subsistence marketplaces. Journal of Global Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2021.1890866
59.
VoolaA.VoolaR. (2019). Developing capabilities and freedoms at the base of the pyramid. In SinghR. (Ed.), Bottom of the pyramid marketing: Making, shaping and developing BOP markets (pp. 189–198). Emerald Publishing Limited.
60.
WasieleskiD.WaddockS.FortT.Guimarães-CostaN. (2021). Natural sciences, management theory, and system transformation for sustainability. Business & Society, 60, 7–25.
61.
ZeithamlV. A.JaworskiB. J.KohliA. K.TuliK. R.UlagaW.ZaltmanG. (2020). A theories-in-use approach to building marketing theory. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 32–51.
62.
ZsolnaiL. (2020). Identifying and solving the right problem by using multidimensional systems thinking. In ZsolnaiL.ThompsonM. (Eds.), Responsible research for better business: Creating useful and credible knowledge for business and society (pp. 35–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
