Intentional teaching: Can early-childhood educators create the conditions for children’s conceptual development when following a child-centred programme?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2019
Intentional teaching: Can early-childhood educators create the conditions for children’s conceptual development when following a child-centred programme?
This study investigated the practice of two early-childhood educators and their interactions with 24 children (mean age 5.2 years) in an inner-suburban Australian preschool setting. The study specifically examined the nature of how educators ‘intentionally teach’ concepts to young children in a child-centred programme. Six hours of educator–child digital video observations and three hours of educator interviews were gathered and analysed using Kravtsova’s (2009) concept of ‘subject positioning’. The findings suggest that it was challenging to teach intentionally in a child-centred programme based on children’s interests. This research is the first phase of a larger study. It is argued that the tensions between educators’ beliefs about child learning and their role in relation to fostering children’s conceptual development in child-centred programmes could make it difficult for educators to implement intentional teaching as presented in the Australian Early Years Learning Framework (DEEWR, 2009).
BredekampS. (Ed.) (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
2.
Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra, Australia.
3.
DeviA.FleerM.LiL. (2018). ‘We set up a small world’: Preschool teachers’ involvement in children’s imaginative play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(3), 295–311. doi:10.1080/09669760.2018.1452720
4.
EdwardsS. (2017). Play-based learning and intentional teaching: Forever different?Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(2), 4–11. doi:10.23965/ajec.42.2.01
5.
FleerM. (2010). Early learning and development: Cultural-historical concepts in play. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
FleerM. (2015). Pedagogical positioning in play – teachers being inside and outside of children’s imaginary play. Early Child Development and Care, 185(11–12), 1801–1814. doi:10.1080/03004430.2015.1028393
7.
GrieshaberS. (2018). Developments in curriculum and assessment in the early years in Australia. In FleerM.van OersB. (Eds.), International handbook of early childhood education (pp. 1211–1226). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Nature.
8.
HedegaardM. (2008). Principles for interpreting research protocols. In HedegaardM.FleerM.(with BangJ.HviidP.) (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 46–64). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
9.
HedegaardM. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture and, Activity, 19(2), 127–138. doi:10.1080/10749039.2012.665560
10.
HedgesH. (2014). Children’s content learning in play provision: Competing tensions and future possibilities. In BrookerL.BlaiseM.EdwardsS. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp. 192–203). London, UK: SAGE.
11.
HedgesH.CooperM. (2018). Relational play-based pedagogy: Theorising a core practice in early childhood education. Teachers and Teaching, 24(4), 369–383. doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1430564
12.
HedgesH.CullenJ.JordanB. (2011). Early years curriculum: Funds of knowledge as a conceptual framework for children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 185–205. doi:10.1080/00220272.2010.511275
13.
KilderryA. (2015). Intentional pedagogies: Insights from the past. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 20–28. doi:10.1177/183693911504000304
14.
KilderryA.NolanA.ScottC. (2017). ‘Out of the loop’: Early childhood educators gaining confidence with unfamiliar policy discourse. Early Years, 37(4), 341–354. doi:10.1080/09575146.2016.118359
15.
KravtsovaE. E. (2009). The cultural-historical foundations of the zone of proximal development. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(6), 9–24. doi:10.2753/rpo1061-0405470601
16.
LeggettN.FordM. (2013). A fine balance: Understanding the roles educators and children play as intentional teacher and intentional learners within the ‘Early Years Learning Framework’. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4), 42–50. doi:10.1177/183693911303800406
17.
RogoffB. (1995/2008). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In HallK.MurphyP.SolerJ. (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 58–74). Milton Keynes, UK: SAGE. (Reprinted from J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.) (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.)
18.
Siraj-BlatchfordI. (2004). Quality teaching in the early years. In AnningA.CullenJ.FleerM. (Eds.), Early childhood education: Society and culture. London, UK: SAGE.
TaylerC.IshimineK.CloneyD.ClevelandG.ThorpeK. (2013). The quality of early childhood education and care services in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 13–21.
21.
VygotskyL. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In RieberR. W.CartonA. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology. (Vol. 1, MinickN., Trans., pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
