Previous research has evaluated technology-based service encounters (TBSEs) in the delivery of health care by assessing patient satisfaction. This study examined service quality and perceived value of TBSES used in health organisations from the perspective of clinical staff, with staff technology readiness as a moderator. A quantitative survey was conducted in Taiwan, across private and public healthcare organisations. Results showed that TBSEs had a direct effect on service quality and perceived value, which in turn had a direct effect on staff satisfaction in using TBSES. However, service quality had no effect on perceived value when moderated by technology readiness. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.
AbdolrasulniaM.MenachemiN.ShewchukR.M.GinterP.M.DuncanW.J.BrooksR.G. (2008). Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care Management Review33(3): 243–252.
2.
AkterM.UpalM.HaniU. (2008). Service quality perception and satisfaction: A study over sub-urban public hospitalist in Banglandesh. Journal of Services Research Special Issue: 125–145.
3.
AndaleedS. (2008). Caring for children: A model of healthcare service quality in Bangladesh. International Journal for Quality in Health Care20(5): 339–345.
4.
CengizE.KirhbirF. (2007). Customer perceived value: The development of multiple item scale in hospitals. Problems and Perspective in Management5(3): 252–268.
5.
ChakrabartyS.WhittenD.GreenK. (2007). Understanding service quality and relationship quality in is outsourcing: Client orientation & promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit. Journal of Computer Information Systems48(2): 1–15.
6.
ChangH.H.ChangS. (2008). An assessment of technology-based service encounter and network security on the e-health care systems of medical centre in Taiwan. BMC Health Services Research8(87): 1–13.
7.
CohnK.H.BermanJ.ChaikenB.GreenD.GreenM.MorrisonD.SchergerJ.E. (2009). Engaging physicians to adopt healthcare information technology. Journal of Healthcare Management54(5): 291–300.
8.
DabholkarP.A.ShepherdC.D.ThorpeD.I. (2000). A comprehensive framework for service quality: An investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing76(2): 139–173.
9.
DelliFraineJ.DanskyK.RumbergerJ. (2006). Can organizational support for technology influence job satisfaction?Health Care Management Review31(4): 300–307.
10.
DuclosA.GillaizeauF.ColombetI.CosteJ.DurieuxP, (2008). Health staff perception regarding quality of delivered information to inpatients. International Journal for Quality in Health Care20(1): 13–21.
11.
FroehleC.RothA. (2004). New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management22(1): 1–21.
12.
HuH.KandampullyJ.JuwaheerT.D. (2009). Relationship and impacts of service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and image: An empirical study. The Service Industries Journal29(2): 111–125.
13.
LeidnerD.E.KayworthT. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly30(2): 357–399.
14.
LiL.BentonW.C. (2006). Hospital technology and nurse staffing management decisions. Journal of Operations Management24(5): 676–691.
15.
LiPBahenskyJ.A.JaanaM.WardM.M. (2008). Role of multihospital system membership in electronic medical record adoption. Health Care Management Review33(2): 169–177.
16.
LiljanderVLiljanderVGillbergF.GummerusJ.van RielA. (2006). Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services13(3): 177–191.
17.
LinJ.C.HsiehP, (2006). The role of technology readiness in customers' perception and adoption of self-service technologies. International Journal of Service Industry Management17(5): 487–517.
18.
NeufeldD.J.DongL.HigginsC. (2007). Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology. European Journal of Information System16(4): 494–510.
19.
OlolaC.H.O.NarusS.PoyntonM.NebekerJ.HalesJ.RowanB.SmithM.EvansR.S. (2011). Patient-perceived usefulness of an emergency medical card and a continuity-of-care report in enhancing the quality of care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care23(1): 60–67.
20.
ParasuramanA. (2000). Technology readiness index. Journal of Service Research2(4): 307–320.
21.
ParasuramanA.GrewalD. (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: A research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science28(1): 168–174.
22.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlVBerryL. (1998). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing64(1): 12–40.
23.
RobinsonC. (2007). Clinical Adoption of Information Technology. Canadian Nursing Informatics Journal2(1): 4–21.
24.
RosesL.K.HoppenN.HenriqueJ.L. (2009). Management of perceptions of information technology service quality. Journal of Business Research62(9): 876–882.
25.
SaravananR.PaoK.S. (2007). Measurement of service quality from the customer's perspective: An empirical study. Total Quality Management18(4): 435–449.
SnellmanK.VihtkariT. (2003). Customer complaining behavior in technology-based service encounters. International Journal of Service Industry Management14(2): 217–231.
28.
StrawdermanL.KoubekR. (2008). Human factors and usability in service quality measurement. Human factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing18(4): 454–463.
29.
TamJ.L.M. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: An integrative model. Journal of Marketing Management20(7–8): 897–917.
30.
van der RheeB.VermaR.PlaschkaG.H.KickulJ. R. (2007). Technology readiness, learning goals, and e-leaning: Searching for synergy. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education5(1): 127–149.
31.
WangY. Lo, H.YangY. (2004). An integrated framework for service quality, customer value, satisfaction: Evidence from China's telecommunication industry. Information System Frontiers6(4): 325–340.
32.
WoodruffR.B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science25(2): 139–53.
33.
YangZ.PetersonR.T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing21(10): 799–822.
