Proximal phalangeal fractures are common and can have a significant impact on hand function. Therefore, it is important to optimise post-operative rehabilitation. A scoping review was undertaken to map the existing evidence on rehabilitation of proximal phalangeal fractures of the fingers in adults.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted which included database searching, reference searching, hand searching of journals, and searching for grey literature. Eight articles were included after screening for eligibility.
Results
Three studies researched surgical interventions and five studies conservative management. The immobilisation period varied between 5 days to 3 weeks in the surgical studies, and between 3 to 7 weeks in the conservative studies. Active exercise therapy was started immediately with conservative management, while in the surgical studies time to commence exercises varied between 5 days and 3 weeks. All studies reported good results in mobility with a mean total active motion ranging from 240° to 258.9°. Patients reported little pain at final follow-up and grip strength recovered to 96% compared to the unaffected side. Studies reporting on function and patient satisfaction lacked transparency.
Conclusions
All studies had a moderate to high risk of bias and the results of the included studies should therefore be interpreted with caution. More high-quality randomised controlled studies with an a priori research protocol and a standard set of outcome measures are necessary to research whether early motion, an intrinsic plus splint leaving the wrist free, and the inclusion of additional treatment modalities can result in a better and/or faster recovery.
FeehanLM. Extra-articular hand fractures, part II: therapist’s management. In: SkirvenTM (eds). Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby, 2011, pp. 386–401.
2.
KarlJWOlsonPRRosenwasserMP. The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma2015; 29: e242–e244.
3.
HoveLM. Fractures of the hand: distribution and relative incidence. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg1993; 27: 317–319.
4.
VerverDTimmermansLKlaassenRA, et al.Treatment of extra-articular proximal and middle phalangeal fractures of the hand: a systematic review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr2017; 12: 63–76.
5.
van OnselenEBHKarimRBHageJJ, et al.Prevalence and distribution of hand fractures. J Hand Surg Br2003; 28: 491–495.
6.
FeehanLMShepsSB. Incidence and demographics of hand fractures in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am2006; 31: 1068–1074.
7.
FrazierWHMillerMFoxRS, et al.Hand injuries: incidence and epidemiology in an emergency service. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians1978; 7: 265–268.
8.
JehanSChandraprakasamTThambirajS. Management of proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand using finger nail traction and a digital splint: a prospective study of 43 cases. Clin Orthop Surg2012; 4: 156–162.
9.
GastonRGChadderdonC. Phalangeal fractures: displaced/nondisplaced. Hand Clin2012; 28: 395–401.
10.
HenryMH. Fractures of the proximal phalanx and metacarpals in the hand: preferred methods of stabilization. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2008; 16: 586–595.
11.
GiddinsGEB. The non-operative management of hand fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2015; 40: 33–41.
12.
LögtersTTLeeHHGehrmannS, et al.Proximal phalanx fracture management. Hand2018; 13: 376–383.
13.
FranzTHaxhosajQWartburgU, et al.Lucerne cast – LuCa: functional conservative treatment of extra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanges of the fingers (with video). Hand Surg Rehabil2018; 37: 124–125.
14.
ShewringDJTrickettRWSmithA. Fractures at the junction of diaphysis and metaphysis of the proximal phalanges in adults. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2018; 43: 506–512.
15.
CarpenterSRohdeRS. Treatment of phalangeal fractures. Hand Clin2013; 29: 519–534.
16.
KieseritzkyJV. Phalangeal Fractures: Current Treatments, Complications and Innovations. Solna, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet, 2019.
17.
KöseATopalMEnginMÇ, et al.Comparison of low-profile plate-screw and Kirschner-wire osteosynthesis outcomes in extra-articular unstable proximal phalangeal fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2019; 29: 597–604.
18.
HenryTWTulipanJEKwanSA, et al.Outcomes after surgically managed oblique extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures: a comparison of closed-reduction percutaneous pinning and open-reduction internal fixation with lag screws. Hand (NY)2021; 18: 48–54. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211003185
19.
HortonTCHattonMDavisTRC. A prospective randomised controlled study of fixation of long oblique and spiral shaft fractures of the proximal phalanx: closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wiring versus open reduction and lag screw fixation. J Hand Surg Br2003; 28: 5–9.
20.
PutterCE deSellesRWPolinderS, et al.Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries. J Bone Jt Surg2012; 94: e56.
21.
HaysPLRozentalTD. Rehabilitative strategies following hand fractures. Hand Clin2013; 29: 585–600.
22.
KatayamaTFurutaKOnoH, et al.Clinical outcomes of unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated with a locking plate system: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2020; 45: 582–587.
23.
PandeyRSoniNBhayanaH, et al.Hand function outcome in closed small bone fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation by mini plate or closed crossed pinning: a randomised controlled trail. Musculoskelet Surg2019; 103: 99–105.
24.
ThomasBPSreekanthRPallapatiSCR. Open proximal phalangeal shaft fractures of the hand treated by theta fixation. Indian J Orthop2015; 49: 312–316.
RajeshGIpWYChowSP, et al.Dynamic treatment for proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand. J Orthop Surg2007; 15: 211–215.
27.
FeehanLMBassettK. Is there evidence for early mobilization following an extraarticular hand fracture?J Hand Ther2004; 17: 300–308.
28.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med2018; 169: 467–473.
29.
PetersMDJGodfreyCMKhalilH, et al.Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc2015; 13: 141–146.
30.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol2005; 8: 19–32.
31.
PetersMDJMarnieCTriccoAC, et al.Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth2020; 18: 2119–2126.
32.
BolandACherryMGDicksonR. Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd, 2017.
33.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2019.
34.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedorowiczZ, et al.Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev2016; 5: 210.
35.
KhalilHPetersMGodfreyCM, et al.An evidence‐based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews Évid Based Nurs2016; 13: 118–123.
36.
AveyardH. Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care. 4th ed. London, UK: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.
37.
ZhiXCanaveseFLiY, et al.Fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx in children: comparison between cast immobilisation and Kirschner wire fixation. J Pediatr Orthop B2021; 30: 358–363.
38.
MehlingIMSchilloKArsAlAn-WernerA, et al.[Fractures of the thumb ray]. Unfallchirurg2016; 119: 978–985.
39.
LeversedgeFJ. Anatomy and pathomechanics of the thumb. Hand Clin2008; 24: 219–229.
40.
HattoriYDoiKSakamotoS, et al.Volar plating for intra-articular fracture of the base of the proximal phalanx. J Hand Surg Am2007; 32: 1299–1303.
41.
JunDBaeJShinD, et al.Controlled active exercise after open reduction and internal fixation of hand fractures. Arch Plast Surg2021; 48: 98–106.
42.
GangatharamS. The effect of early controlled mobilization combined with target focused exercise regime in management of closed reduction K-wire fixation of proximal phalanx fracture. Hand Surg Rehabil2021; 40: 631–636. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.04.005
43.
LoosliAGarrickJGLoosliA. The functional treatment of a third proximal phalanx fracture. Am J Sports Med1987; 15: 94–96.
44.
HackettKNewtonJRapleyT, et al.Systematic reviews of occupational therapy interventions: summarizing research evidence and highlighting the gaps. Br J Occup Ther2014; 77: 479–482.
45.
AveyardHSharpPWoolliamsM. A Beginner’s Guide to Critical Thinking and Writing in Health and Social Care. 2nd ed. London, UK: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
46.
AveyardHSharpP. A Beginner’s Guide to Evidence Based Practice. 3rd ed. London, UK: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.
47.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al.RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj2019; 366: l4898.
48.
BurnsPBRohrichRJChungKC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg2011; 128: 305–310.
49.
LisyK. Quality counts: reporting appraisal and risk of bias. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep2015; 13: 1–2.
50.
MunnZBarkerTHMoolaS, et al.Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth2019; 18: 2127–2133.
51.
PorrittK. JBI’s systematic reviews: study selection and critical appraisal. Am J Nurs2014; 114: 47–52.
52.
ByrneBJacquesAGurfinkelR. Non-surgical management of isolated proximal phalangeal fractures with immediate mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2020; 45: 126–130.
53.
AtakerYUludagSEceSC, et al.Early active motion after rigid internal fixation of unstable extra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2017; 42: 803–809.
54.
HeldMJordaanPLaubscherM, et al.Conservative treatment of fractures of the proximal phalanx: an option even for unstable fracture patterns. Hand Surg2013; 18: 229–234.
55.
FranzTWartburgUvHugU, et al.[Extraarticular proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand: functional conservative management using the Lucerne cast (LuCa) - a preliminary prospective study]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir2010; 42: 293–298.
56.
FranzTvon WartburgUSchibli-BeerS, et al.Extra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanges of the fingers: a comparison of 2 methods of functional, conservative treatment. J Hand Surg Am2012; 37: 889–898.
57.
PortneyLG. Foundations of Clinical Research. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company, 2020.
58.
BowlingA. Research Methods in Health. London, UK: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
59.
BowlingAEbrahimS. Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, 2005.
60.
GreenhalghT. How to Implement Evidence-Based Healthcare. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell, 2018.
ParéGKitsiouS. Chapter 9: methods for literature reviews. In: LauFKuziemskyC (eds). Handbook of ehealth evaluation: an evidence-based approach. Victoria, Canada: University of Victoria, 2016, pp. 157–179.
63.
DayCS. Fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges. In: WolfeSW (eds). Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2017.
64.
MillerLGAdaLCrosbieJ, et al.Time to commencement of active exercise predicts total active range of motion 6 weeks after proximal phalanx fracture fixation: a retrospective review. Hand Ther2017; 22: 73–78.
65.
WehbeMA. Tendon gliding exercises. Am J Occup Ther1987; 41: 164–167.
66.
KennedyS. Treatment of acute adhered flexor tendons following proximal phalangeal fracture: a case study. The British Journal of Hand Therapy2008; 13: 54–58.
67.
MillerLAdaLCrosbieJ, et al.Pattern of recovery after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures in the finger: a prospective longitudinal study. J Hand Surg Br2017; 42: 137–143.
68.
HumeMCGellmanHMcKellopH, et al.Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. J Hand Surg Am1990; 15: 240–243.
69.
BallCPrattALNanchahalJ. Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2013; 14: 131–131.
70.
MillerLAdaLCrosbieJ, et al.Pain in the post-operative week predicts pain and hand use twelve weeks after proximal phalangeal fracture fixation. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol2019; 24: 462–468.
71.
JensenMPMcFarlandCA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain1993; 55: 195–203.
72.
MunnZPetersMDJSternC, et al.Systematic review or scoping review? guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. Bmc Med Res Methodol2018; 18: 143.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
