Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2013-12
The benefits of early active motion on thumb range of motion following extensor pollicis longus tendon repair in zones TIII–TV: A prospective comparison pilot study
Extensor pollicis longus (EPL) is the most commonly injured extensor tendon in the hand. Following repair of this tendon, whilst early active motion within a volar orthosis is simple and inexpensive, it is not known whether it is more effective at regaining thumb motion than immobilisation.
Methods
A prospective comparison pilot study including 20 outpatients with repaired EPL tendon lacerations in zones TIII–TV was undertaken. Participants were non-randomly allocated to either immobilisation group or early active motion. The primary outcome measure was thumb interphalangeal joint active extension–flexion. Secondary outcome measures were metacarphalangeal joint active extension–flexion, composite active thumb opposition and retropulsion, the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation and return to work.
Results
At 8 weeks, the mean between-group differences for interphalangeal joint extension (−10°; 95% CI −1 to −19), metacarphalangeal joint extension (−12°; 95% CI −23 to −0.4) and composite thumb retropulsion as a percentage of uninjured side (42%; 95% CI 3–81) were all clinically important. There were no other significant between-group differences at 6 or 8 weeks, and no ruptures in either group.
Conclusion
This pilot comparison study indicated that early active motion has an effect on thumb interphalangeal joint extension, metacarphalangeal joint extension and composite thumb retropulsion by 8 weeks post-operatively. This study lends weight to the need for a properly conducted randomised controlled trial.
EmersonETKrizekTJGreenwaldDP. Anatomy, physiology and functional restoration of the thumb. Ann Plast Surg1996; 36: 180–191.
2.
MerleMDantelG. Advances in digital replantation. Clin Plast Surg1997; 24: 87–105.
3.
ClaytonRACourt-BrownCM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury2008; 39: 1338–1344.
4.
PatilloDRayanGM. Open extensor tendon injuries: an epidemiologic study. J Hand Surgery2012; 17: 37–42.
5.
PurcellTEadiePAMuruganS. Static splinting of extensor tendon repairs. J Hand Surgery [Br]2000; 25: 180–182.
6.
NewportMLBlairWFSteyersCM. Long-term results of extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surgery [Am]1990; 15: 961–966.
7.
LangerNHänggiJMüllerNA. Effects of limb immobilization on brain plasticity. Neurology2012; 78: 182–188.
8.
GelbermanRHWooSLLothringerK. Effects of early intermittent passive mobilization on healing canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surgery [Am]1982; 7: 170–175.
9.
TanakaHManskePRPruittDL. Effect of cyclic tension on lacerated flexor tendons in vitro. J Hand Surgery [Am]1995; 20: 467–73.
10.
FeehanLMBeaucheneJG. Early tensile properties of healing chicken flexor tendons: early controlled passive motion versus postoperative immobilization. J Hand Surg [Am]1990; 15: 63–68.
11.
BuckwalterJA. Effects of early motion on healing of musculoskeletal tissues. Hand Clin1996; 12: 13–24.
12.
ChowJDovelleSThomasL. A comparison of results of extensor tendon repairs followed by early controlled mobilization versus static immobilization. J Hand Surgery [Br]1989; 14: 18–18.
13.
MowlaviABurnsMBrownRE. Dynamic versus static splinting of simple zone V and zone VI extensor tendon repairs: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surgery2005; 115: 482–487.
14.
IpWYChowSP. Results of dynamic splintage following extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surgery [Br]1997; 22: 283–287.
15.
ElliotDSouthgateC. New concepts in managing the long tendons of the thumb after primary repair. J Hand Therapy2005; 18: 141–156.
16.
KhandwalaARBlairJHarrisSB. Immediate repair and early mobilization of the extensor pollicis longus tendon in zones 1 to 4. J Hand Surgery [Br]2004; 29: 250–258.
17.
KubotaHManskePRAokiM. Effect of motion and tension on injured flexor tendons in chickens. J Hand Surgery [Am]1996; 21: 456–463.
18.
Sapienza A, Yoon HK, Karia R, et al. Flexor tendon excursion and load during passive and active simulated motion: a cadaver study. J Hand Surgery [Br] 2012 (online) December 6, 1753193412469128.
19.
WadaAKubotaHMiyanishiK. Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surgery [Br]2012; 6: 301–306.
20.
SylaidisPYouattMLoganA. Early active mobilization for extensor tendon injuries: the Norwich regime. J Hand Surgery [Br]1997; 22: 594–596.
21.
HirthMJBennettKMahE. Early return to work and improved range of motion with modified relative motion splinting: a retrospective comparison with immobilization splinting for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs. Hand Therapy2011; 16: 86–94.
22.
HowellJWMerrittWHRobinsonSJ. Immediate controlled active motion following zone 4–7 extensor tendon repair. J Hand Therapy2005; 18: 182–190.
23.
EvansR. Early active short arc motion for the repaired central slip. J Hand Surg1994; 19: 991–997.
24.
BulstrodeNBurrNPrattA. Extensor tendon rehabilitation a prospective trial comparing three rehabilitation regimes. J Hand Surg [Br]2005; 30: 175–179.
25.
ChesterDLBealeSBeveridgeL. A prospective, controlled, randomized trial comparing early active extension with passive extension using a dynamic splint in the rehabilitation of repaired extensor tendons. J Hand Surgery [Br]2002; 27: 283–288.
26.
KhandwalaAWebbJHarrisS. A comparison of dynamic extension splinting and controlled active mobilization of complete divisions of extensor tendons in zones 5 and 6. J Hand Surg [Br]2000; 25B: 140–146.
SlaterRBynumD. Simplified functional splinting after extensor tenorrhaphy. J Hand Surgery [Am]1997; 22A: 445–451.
29.
BurrNPrattA. Early active mobilisation for thumb extensor tendon repairs: a review of two case studies. J Hand Therapy [Br]2006; 11: 114–119.
30.
EvansR. Immediate short arc motion following extensor tendon repair. Hand Clinics1995; 11: 483–483.
31.
GiesslerGAPrzybilskiMGermannG. Early free active versus dynamic extension splinting after extensor indicis proprius tendon transfer to restore thumb extension: a prospective randomized study. J Hand Surg [Am]2008; 33: 864–868.
32.
VerdanCPrimary and secondary repair of flexor and extensor tendon injuries. In: FlynnJE (eds). Hand surgery, Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1966, pp. 20–75.
33.
AdamsLSGreeneLWTopoozianERange of motion. In: CasanovaJ (eds). Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd ed. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1992, pp. 55–70.
34.
HamiltonGLachenbruchP. Reliability of goniometry in assessing finger joint angle. Phys Therapy1969; 49: 465–469.
35.
GoldsmithNJuzlE. Inter-rater reliability of two trained raters using a goniometer for the measurement of finger joints. Br J Hand Therapy1998; 3: 11–12.
36.
EllisBBrutonAGoddardJ. Joint angle measurement: a comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand. Clin Rehab1997; 11: 314–320.
37.
EllisBBrutonA. A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand. Clin Rehab2002; 16: 562–570.
38.
MacDermidJTottenhamV. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Therapy2004; 17: 18–23.
39.
MacDermidJTurgeonTRichardsR. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthopaed Trauma1998; 12: 577–86.
40.
EvansRBurkhalterW. A study of the dynamic anatomy of extensor tendons and implications for treatment. J Hand Surgery [Am]1986; 11A: 774–774.
