Does robust greater tuberosity repair affect the outcomes of reverse shoulder replacement in proximal humerus fractures? – A Bayesian network meta-analysis
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026
Does robust greater tuberosity repair affect the outcomes of reverse shoulder replacement in proximal humerus fractures? – A Bayesian network meta-analysis
Proximal humerus fractures are common in older adults, and the role of greater tuberosity (GT) repair in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains debated. Some surgeons omit GT repair to simplify surgery, but the functional impact of not repairing it is unclear. This study compared outcomes of healed GT repair, non-healed repair, and no repair.
Methods
A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane; inception – February 2025) included 20 Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS)-appraised studies. Outcomes were Constant score and shoulder motion. Analyses comprised: (a) a frequentist network meta-analysis of healed, non-healed, and no repair; and (b) a Bayesian comparison of any repair versus no repair.
Results
Among 1885 patients, healed repair produced higher Constant scores and better abduction, external rotation, and forward flexion than non-healed or no repair. Non-healed repair and no repair showed similar outcomes. Bayesian analysis confirmed functional benefits of GT repair. Implant type had no effect.
Conclusions
GT repair improves postoperative function after RSA, with maximal benefit when healing occurs.
Court-BrownCMCaesarB. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury2006; 37: 691–697.
2.
HandollHBrealeySRanganA, et al. The ProFHer (PROximal fracture of the humerus: Evaluation by randomisation) trial – A pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults. Health Technol Assess (Rockv)2015; 19: 1–279.
3.
AchakriHBridgensJBrittainR, et al. NJR statistical analysis, support and associated services. London, UK: National Joint Registry; 2024. www.njrcentre.org.uk.
4.
MinarroJCSanchez-SoteloJ. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a review of current evidence. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med2024; 17: 393–401.
5.
HeoSMFaulknerHAnV, et al. Outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs operative fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2024; 106: 562–568.
6.
RanganAGwilymSKedingA, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty versus non-surgical treatment for older adults with acute 3- or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PROFHER-2: PROximal Fracture of Humerus Evaluation by Randomisation – Trial Number 2). Trials2023; 24: 270.
7.
BoileauPWatkinsonDJHatzidakisAM, et al. Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2005; 14: 147S–161S.
8.
TorrensCAlentorn-GeliEMingoF, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes. J Orthop Surg2018; 26: 2309499018760132.
9.
JainNPMannanSSDharmarajanR, et al. Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients—does it improve outcomes?A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: e78–e91.
10.
SchmalzlJJessenMSadlerN, et al. High tuberosity healing rate associated with better functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2020; 21: 35.
11.
BarrosLHFigueiredoSMarquesM, et al. Tuberosity Healing after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Is there Clinical Improvement?Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)2020; 55: 748–754.
12.
BoileauPAltaTDDecroocqL, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: is it worth reattaching the tuberosities?J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: 437–444.
13.
Masnou ECassartAndrés RPérezSolé EMora, et al. Anatomic greater tuberosity healing does not influence the functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures. Shoulder Elbow2023; 15: 60–68.
14.
ChunYMKimDSLeeDH, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for four-part proximal humerus fracture in elderly patients: can a healed tuberosity improve the functional outcomes?J Shoulder Elbow Surg2017; 26: 1216–1221.
15.
CuffDJPupelloDR. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am2013; 95: 2050–2055.
16.
DerksenALillHEllweinA, et al. Tuberosity refixation improves functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2024; 34: 1441–1448.
17.
GallinetDCazeneuveJFBoyerE, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for recent proximal humerus fractures: Outcomes in 422 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2019; 105: 805–811.
18.
GarofaloRFlanaginBCastagnaA, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture using a dedicated stem: Radiological outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up-case series. J Orthop Surg Res2015; 10.129. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0261-1.
19.
GrubhoferFWieserKMeyerDC, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute head-splitting, 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 1690–1698.
20.
GunstSLouboutinLSwanJ, et al. Does healing of both greater and lesser tuberosities improve functional outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture? A retrospective study of twenty-eight cases with a computed tomography scan at a minimum of one-year follow-up. Int Orthop2021; 45: 681–687.
21.
HolschenMKörtingMKhourdajiP, et al. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2022; 142: 3817–3826.
22.
LucianiPFarinelliLProcacciniR, et al. Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: A 5-year long term retrospective study of elderly patients. Injury2019; 50: 1974–1977.
23.
MarinRFeltriPFerraroS, et al. Impact of tuberosity treatment in reverse shoulder arthroplasty after proximal humeral fractures: A multicentre study. J Orthop Sci2023; 28: 765–771.
24.
Mohapatra NChandraSahooUSSahooMM. Effect of tuberosity repair on functional outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures. Chin J Traumatol2023; 26: 94–100.
25.
OhlXBonnevialleNGallinetD, et al. How the greater tuberosity affects clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2018; 27: 2139–2144.
26.
PorcelliniGMontanariMGiorginiA, et al. Great tuberosity fixation does not affect healing and clinical outcomes in RSA performed in proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Musculoskelet Surg2024; 108: 107–114.
27.
ReutherFPetermannMStanglR. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Acute Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: Does Tuberosity Healing Improve Clinical Outcomes?J Orthop Trauma2019; 33: E46–E51.
28.
Sebastiá-ForcadaECebrián-GómezRLizaur-UtrillaA, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 1419–1426.
29.
SimovitchRWRocheCPJonesRB, et al. Effect of Tuberosity Healing on Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients Treated with a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for 3-and 4-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures. J Orthop Trauma2019; 33: E39–E45.
30.
DabijaDIJainNB. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2019; 98: 671–676.
31.
GallinetDClappazPGarbuioP, et al. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: A comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2009; 95: 48–55.
32.
FormainiNTEverdingNGLevyJC, et al. Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: The ‘black and tan’ technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: e299–e306.
33.
LuGAdesAE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med2004; 23: 3105–3124.
34.
DiasSWeltonNJSuttonAJ, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a Bayesian method for network meta-analysis. Med Decis Making2013;33:607–617.
35.
DiasSSuttonAJWeltonNJ, et al. Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: Inconsistency in networks of evidence. Med Decis Making2013;33:641–656.
36.
SpiegelhalterDJAbramsKRMylesJP. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.
37.
GelmanACarlinJBSternHS, et al. Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
38.
GreenlandS. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: I. Foundations and basic methods. Int J Epidemiol2006;35:765–775.
