Elbow septic arthritis makes up about 6–9% of all septic arthritis cases. Optimum management and outcomes are extrapolated from other large joints and there is very scarce literature specifically for the elbow joint. This systematic review aims to analyse the available evidence on the management and outcomes of native septic arthritis of the elbow.
Methods
A review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted of three databases. Adult patients suffering from native elbow septic arthritis were included. Outcomes of interest included functional outcomes and complications.
Results
About 11 studies with 47 patients were included. The most common causative organism was staphylococcus aureus. About 46 patients were managed with surgery, either arthroscopic or open. About 17 patients, across three studies, had a Mayo Elbow Performance Score reported ranging from 70.0–100.0 and 77% of patients regained range of motion. About 12.9% of patients returned to theatre during their initial infection, 5% of patients developed a repeat infection and there was a 7% mortality rate.
Discussions
This review shows good outcomes for this group of patients, however there is a group who are at risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Further evidence is needed to identify how to optimise treatment in this subset.
KennedyNChambersSTNolanI, et al.Native joint septic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, and microbiological causes in a New Zealand population. J Rheumatol2015; 42: 2392–2397.
2.
WestonVJonesABradburyN, et al.Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK health district 1982–1991. Ann Rheum Dis1999; 58: 214–219.
3.
MehtaPSchnallSBZalavrasCG. Septic arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Clin Orthop2006; 451: 42–45.
4.
EarwoodJSWalkerTRSueGJC. Septic arthritis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician2021; 104: 589–597.
5.
MercerHLRodriguezDMikolaE, et al.The septic elbow joint: treatment approaches for improved patient outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am2024; 55: 247–255.
6.
NduagubaAMFlynnJMSankarWN. Septic arthritis of the elbow in children: clinical presentation and microbiological profile. J Pediatr Orthop2016; 36: 75.
7.
LongBKoyfmanAGottliebM. Evaluation and management of septic arthritis and its mimics in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med2019; 20: 331–341.
8.
RossJJ. Septic arthritis of native joints. Infect Dis Clin North Am2017; 31: 203–218.
9.
AbdelmalekAHainesSTadrosBJ, et al.Re-operation rates of arthroscopic management versus arthrotomy in treatment of septic arthritis of native shoulder joint in adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2023; 33: 2717–2727.
10.
PuzzitielloRNAgarwallaAMasoodR, et al.Arthroscopic treatment is a safe and eeffective alternative to open treatment for acute septic arthritis of the native knee: a systematic review. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg2024; 40: 972–980.
11.
BalatoGde MatteoVAscioneT, et al.Management of septic arthritis of the hip joint in adults. A systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021; 22: 1006.
12.
Garcı´a-De La TorreT. Advances in the management of septic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin2003; 29: 61–75.
13.
JordanRWAhmedID’AlessandroP, et al.Shoulder arthroplasty in the management of native shoulder joint infections has a high complication rate and poor functional outcome – a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow2025; 17: 22–35.
14.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000097.
15.
National Institute for Health and Care Research. PROSPERO - International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
16.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg2003; 73: 712–716.
17.
JeroschJHoffstetterISchröderM, et al.Septic arthritis: arthroscopic management with local antibiotic treatment. Acta Orthop Belg1995; 61: 126–134.
18.
NowbarSRidoutEChanED. A 60-year-old man with septic arthritis and hypotension after a fall. Chest1999; 115: 883–885.
19.
BachyBBémerPTortellierL, et al.Septic arthritis due to a Sneathia species most closely related to Sneathia sanguinegens. J Med Microbiol2011; 60: 1693–1696.
20.
PolishchukDTanV. Atraumatic septic arthritis of the elbow in a young immunocompetent host secondary to distant hematogenous spread. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)2012; 41: 369–370.
21.
Van Den EndeKIMSteinmannSP. Arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2012; 21: 1001–1005.
22.
MoonJ-GBilarisSJeongW-K, et al.Clinical results after arthroscopic treatment for septic arthritis of the elbow joint. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg2014; 30: 673–678.
23.
NandagudiACKellyS. Ultrasound detection of Salmonella septic arthritis in a rheumatoid arthritis patient on anti-TNF treatment. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep2014; 2: 232470961453279.
24.
AssunçãoJHNoffsGGMalavoltaEA, et al.Septic arthritis of the shoulder and elbow: one decade of epidemiological analysis at a tertiary referral hospital. Rev Bras Ortop2018; 53: 707–713.
25.
PiazzaMJGonzales-ZamoraJA. Acute septic elbow monoarthritis with associated Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacteraemia: an uncommon presentation of an old disease. Infez Med2020; 28: 253–257.
26.
MalipeddiRNemaSKGopisankarB, et al.Clinical outcomes and global health after joint debridement in adult-onset septic arthritis: a prospective observational study. Indian J Orthop2021; 55: 912–917.
27.
PesanteBDSalimiMMillerWL, et al.Associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement of native septic arthritis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2024; 34: 2179–2184.
28.
BaesslerAEasonRRJoyceMR, et al.Reliability testing of the mayo elbow performance score in post-operative patients. J Surg Orthop Adv2022; 31: 229–232.
29.
JonssonEÖWänströmJBjörnsson HallgrenH, et al.The Oxford elbow score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period. JSES Int2023; 7: 499–505.
30.
BovonratwetPFuMCPathakN, et al.Surgical treatment of septic shoulders: a comparison between arthrotomy and arthroscopy. Arthroscopy2019; 35: 1984–1991.
31.
PadakiASMaGCTruongNM, et al.Arthroscopic treatment yields lower reoperation rates than open treatment for native knee but not native shoulder septic arthritis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil2022; 4: e1167–e1178.
32.
AbramSGFAlvandAJudgeA, et al.Mortality and adverse joint outcomes following septic arthritis of the native knee: a longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving arthroscopic washout. Lancet Infect Dis2020; 20: 341–349.
33.
DuncanSFMSperlingJW. Treatment of primary isolated shoulder sepsis in the adult patient. Clin Orthop2008; 466: 1392–1396.
34.
LeslieBMHarrisJMDriscollD. Septic arthritis of the shoulder in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am1989; 71: 1516–1522.
35.
FerrandJEl SamadYBrunschweilerB, et al.Morbimortality in adult patients with septic arthritis: a three-year hospital-based study. BMC Infect Dis2016; 16: 239.
36.
CoakleyGMathewsCFieldM, et al.BSR & BHPR, BOA, RCGP and BSAC guidelines for management of the hot swollen joint in adults. Rheumatol Oxf Engl2006; 45: 1039–1041.
37.
FangthamMBaerAN. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus arthritis in adults: case report and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum2012; 41: 604–610.
38.
YaowmaneeratTAiewruengsuratD. AB0922 Clinical manifestations and outcomes of acute septic arthritis in songklanagarind hospital: a 10-year retrospective study. Ann Rheum Dis2017; 76: 1378–1378.
39.
SperlingJWKozakTKHanssenAD, et al.Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop2001; 382: 206–216.
40.
BohsaliKIWirthMARockwoodCA. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 2279–2292.
41.
Infections of the musculoskeletal system: basic principles, prevention, diagnosis and treatment. 1st edn. Grandvaux: Swiss orthopaedics in-house-publisher, 2014.
