Stress shielding in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a proximally coated stem for proximal humeral fractures: Does it have clinical relevance?

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical significance of stress shielding in patients who have undergone an uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a proximally coated stem for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF) comprising 3 or 4 parts, assessed at 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, this study aims to examine the correlation between tuberosity healing and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Setting: Single Centre.

Patient Selection Criteria: 43 patients underwent surgery involving a cementless RSA with an anatomical stem (Mini Stem of Zimmer Biomet ^® Comprehensive System) following an acute 3- or 4-part or 4-part with luxation PHF within 4 weeks of injury. Patients who were excluded from the study included those who passed away, did not have a minimum 2-year follow-up, or had undergone cemented RSAs or alternative humeral components, as well as those who required RSA due to fracture sequelae.

Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Stress shielding, tuberosity healing and its positioning were evaluated. Clinical-functional assessments were made using the Constant and ASES scores. Furthermore, quality of life assessments, including QuickDASH score, SF-12, satisfaction test (SANE) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were performed.

Results

Of the total shoulders, 6 (13.9%) were excluded, leaving 37 PHFs that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of surgery was 72 years (range, 61–85). Stress shielding was observed in 31 shoulders (83.8%). There was no observed correlation between stress shielding and clinical-functional or quality of life assessments. The greater tuberosity in patients without stress shielding was found to be above the tray (66.7%) (P < 0.05). Tuberosity healing was observed in 94.6% (35/37) of the shoulders.

Conclusions

No significant clinical difference was observed between patients with and without stress shielding in terms of short-term functional outcomes. Successful consolidation of the tuberosities can be attained even in cases with notable stress shielding.

Level of Evidence

Level IV; Case Series; Treatment study.

Keywords

Stress shielding proximal humeral fracture reverse shoulder arthroplasty clinical outcome

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nagels

Stokdijk

Rozing

. Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12: 35–39.

Melis

DeFranco

Lädermann

, et al. An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 1240–1246.

Rizkalla

Montemaggi

, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: 1949–1956.

Wright

Kalma

, et al. Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as initial treatment for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33: e263–e269.

Rossi

Guillermina

Buljubasich

, et al. Cemented versus uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31: 261–268.

Harmsen

Norris

. Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes associated with an adjustable diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 1589–1597.

Ross

Hope

Stokes

, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 215–222.

Lopiz

García-Fernandez

Vallejo-Carrasco

, et al.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Int Orthop 2022; 46: 635–644.

Neer

. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970; 52: 1077–1089.

10.

Inoue

Suenaga

Oizumi

, et al. Humeral bone resorption after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using uncemented stem. JSES Int 2020; 4: 138–143.

11.

Mora Guix

Gonzalez

Brugalla

, et al. Proposed protocol for reading images of humeral head fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 225–233.

12.

Giuseffi

Streubel

Sperling

, et al. Short-stem uncemented primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes. Bone Jt J 2014; 96-B: 526–529.

13.

Aibinder

Bartels

Sperling

, et al. Mid-term radiological results of a cementless short humeral component in anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 2019; 101-B: 610–614.

14.

Goñalons-Giol

Ventura-Parellada

Gàmez-Baños

, et al. Stress shielding: short-term radiological results of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic proximal coated stem in proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144: 783–790.

15.

Kramer

Olach

Zdravkovic

, et al. The effects of length and width of the stem on proximal humerus stress shielding in uncemented primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 144: 663–672.

16.

Raiss

Schnetzke

Wittmann

, et al. Postoperative radiographic findings of an uncemented convertible short stem for anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 715–723.

17.

De Joode

SGCJ

Kriechling

Volp

, et al. The effect of humeral diaphyseal stem filling ratio on clinical and radiological outcome. Semin Arthroplasty JSES 2024; 2: 340–347.

18.

Youn

S-M

Deo

Poon

. Functional and radiologic outcomes of uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fractures: cementing the humeral component is not necessary. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: e83–e89.

19.

Dot Pascuet

Arregui Gallego

Valdez

, et al. [Translated article] Influence of lateralized reverse shoulder prosthesis design on tuberosity union in proximal humerus fractures. Rev Espanola Cirugia Ortop Traumatol 2023; 67: T193–T201.

20.

Spormann

Durchholz

Audigé

, et al. Patterns of proximal humeral bone resorption after total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented rectangular stem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 1028–1035.

21.

Cole

Moulton

Gobezie

, et al. Five-year radiographic evaluation of stress shielding with a press-fit standard length humeral stem. JSES Int 2020; 4: 109–113.

22.

Montemaggi

Ouseph

, et al. Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implantation with humeral matchstick autograft augmentation: early radiographic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33: e422–e428.