This study investigated the foraging behaviour and diet composition of grey francolin (Ortygornis pondicerianus) in different seasons (breeding and non-breeding) and habitats (agricultural land, tree-covered land, shrubland, and barren land). Focal sampling and faecal analysis methods were employed to examine the foraging behaviour and diet composition of the grey francolin, respectively. Foraging techniques showed non-significant (p=0.829) variation across different habitat types; however, walk-halt-peck (WHP) was the most commonly utilized foraging technique across all habitats. Additionally, foraging success varied significantly across seasons (p<0.05) and habitats (p<0.05). We recorded significantly higher feeding rates in the shrubland during the breeding season. The percentage of successful attempts was significantly higher (p<0.05) in the breeding season compared to the non-breeding season. Furthermore, faecal analysis results showed a significant (p<0.05) difference in composition between plant and animal matter, especially during the breeding season. However, the grit content showed non-significant variation (p>0.05) across seasons.
Mandiwana-NeudaniTGBowieRCHausbergerMHenryLCroweTM. Taxonomic and phylogenetic utility of variation in advertising calls of francolins and spurfowls (Galliformes: Phasianidae). African Zoology. 2014 Apr 1;49(1):54-82.
2.
Birdlife International (2018). The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2018-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed on 2024 June 20).
3.
PandianM. Studies on the habitats of Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus (JF Gmelin, 1789) (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in northern districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2021 Nov 26;13(13):19948-55.
4.
AliSRipleySD. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. Compact edition. Oxford University Pressand BNHS, Mumbai. Ali, S. and SD Ripley (1995). The Pictorial Guide to the Birds of the Indian Sub-continent. Oxford University Press and BNHS, Mumbai. Baskaran, ST (1992). Sighting of Dusky Horned Owl. Newsletter for Birdwatchers. 1983;32(9):10.
5.
KakakhelSF. Distribution and Habitat Selection of Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus) in Swegali Game Reserve District, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Bioresource Management. 2020;7(4):3.
6.
AzizMKhalidZShahidMZAkhterAAzizR. Population Density and Habitat Analysis of Grey Francolin (Ortygornis pondicerianus) in Taunsa Wildlife Sanctuary, Punjab. Pakistan. Journal of Wildlife and Ecology2024; 8:27-35.
7.
RobinsonSKHolmesRT. Foraging behaviour of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology. 1982 Dec;63(6):1918-31.
8.
MoffatL. An investigation into the importance of foraging behaviour to laying hens (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph).
9.
KeelingLJHurnikFJ. Social facilitation acts more on the appetitive than the consummatory phase of feeding behaviour in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour. 1996 Jul 1;52(1):11-5.
10.
SmithRJBrownJS. A practical technique for measuring the behaviour of foraging animals. The American Biology Teacher. 1991 Apr 1;53(4):236-42.
11.
Flores-YllescasIDe-Labra-HernándezMÁ. Foraging ecology of the bird Eupsittula canicularis (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) in a modified Mexican landscape. Revista de Biología Tropical. 2023 Dec;71(1).
12.
MilesiFADe CasenaveJLCuetoVR. Selection of foraging sites by desert granivorous birds: vegetation structure, seed availability, species-specific foraging tactics, and spatial scale. The Auk. 2008 Apr 1;125(2):473-84.
13.
LiWZhuCGrassIHanPShenYDingPSiX. Widespread arboreal foraging behaviour in ground-dwelling birds and the urgency of life-history studies. Biological Conservation. 2023 Oct 1; 286:110320.
14.
NewellFLBeachyTARodewaldADRengifoCGAuspreyIJRodewaldPG. Foraging behaviour of Cerulean Warblers during the breeding and non‐breeding seasons: evidence for the breeding currency hypothesis. Journal of Field Ornithology. 2014 Sep;85(3):310-20.
15.
YdenbergRC. The behavioural ecology of provisioning in birds. Ecoscience. 1994 Jan 1;1(1):1-4.
16.
RemsenJVRobinsonSK. A classification scheme for the foraging behaviour of birds in terrestrial habitats. Studies in avian biology. 1990 Jan;13(1):144-60.
17.
ThiollayJM. Comparative foraging success of insectivorous birds in tropical and temperate forests: ecological implications. Oikos. 1988 Jul 1:17-30.
18.
King’OriAM. Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchability in poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2011 Feb;10(6):483-92.
19.
RajparM. N.ZakariaM. (2015). The Effects of Climate Change on Avian Diversity in High-Altitude Wetland Habitats. Climate Change Impacts on High-Altitude Ecosystems, 545-567.
20.
MurphySJBellvéAMMiyajimaRJSebuniaNALynchMMJetzWJarzynaMA. SAviTraits 1.0: Seasonally varying dietary attributes for birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2023 Oct;32(10):1690-8.
21.
BishtMS. Diet of Chukar Partridge Alectoris chukar (Grey): Histological analysis of the droppings. J Mountain Res. 2021; 16:201-8.
22.
HouJLiLWangYWangWZhanHDaiNLuP. Influences of submerged plant collapse on diet composition, breadth, and overlap among four crane species at Poyang Lake, China. Frontiers in Zoology. 2021 May 17;18(1):24.
23.
HussainIKHALILS. Population biology of the Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus) in an agro-ecosystem of the Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan. Avian Research. 2012;3(2):91-102.
24.
KhanWAMianA. Food of Grey francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus interpositus) with remarks on competition with black francolin (Francolinus francolinus henrici) in Lal Suhanra National Park (Pakistan). Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 2012 Aug 1;44(4).
25.
MianA.WajidM. M. 1994. Food of Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus) in Layyah District, Southern Punjab. Pak. J. Zool, 26 (2): 185-187.
26.
TritesAWJoyR. Dietary analysis from faecal samples: how many scats are enough?Journal of Mammalogy. 2005 Aug 22;86(4):704-12.
27.
VerkuilY. Stomach-pumping of waders does not necessarily provide more information on diet than faecal analysis. Wader Study Group Bulletin. 1996;79(1):10.
28.
India Meteorological Department. Meteorological Logical Centre, Lucknow. Metrological centre report (2024) https://mausam.imd.gov.in/lucknow/
29.
MishraHKumarVKumarA. Comparative analysis of diet and prey preference of yellow-wattled lapwing, Vanellus malabaricus (Boddaert, 1783). Current Science (00113891). 2024 Oct 10(7).
30.
MishraAMishraHKumarVKumarA. Status and Diversity of Ornithofauna in Joggers Park, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health. 2023 Jun 26:51-6.
31.
AltmannJ. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974 Jan 1;49(3-4):227-66.
MeloTNGuilhermeE. The foraging behaviour of the Large-headed Flatbill, Ramphotrigon megacephalum and the Dusky-tailed Flatbill, Ramphotrigon fuscicauda (Aves: Tyrannidae). Zoologia (Curitiba). 2016 Dec 15;33: e20160104.
34.
SutherlandWJ. The conservation handbook: research, management and policy. John Wiley & Sons; 2008 Apr 15.
35.
SchulzeMDCordovaJLSeavyNEWhitacreDF. Behaviour, diet, and breeding biology of Double-toothed Kites at a Guatemalan lowland site. The Condor. 2000 Feb 1;102(1):113-26.
36.
BarbosaAMorenoE. Evolution of foraging strategies in shorebirds: an ecomorphological approach. The Auk. 1999 Jul 1;116(3):712-25.
37.
FinnP. Habitat selection, foraging ecology and conservation of Eastern Curlews on their non-breeding grounds2010.
38.
GreenlawJS. Taxonomic distribution, origin, and evolution of bilateral scratching in ground-feeding birds. The Condor. 1977 Dec 1;79(4):426-39.
39.
AmehaKAfeworkB. Diurnal activity patterns and feeding behaviour of African jacana (Actophilornis africanus Gmelin) in Lake Hawassa, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2018;41(2):53-60.
40.
MorebySJ. An aid to the identification of arthropod fragments in the faeces of gamebird chicks (Galliformes). Ibis. 1988 Oct;130(6):519-26.
41.
VeselovskaASmolkoPKropilR. A key for the micro histological determination of plant fragments consumed by Carpathian Forest cervids. Forests. 2021 Sep 9;12(9):1229.
42.
WhitakerJOCastorL. Identification of insect parts found in bat guano. Ecological and Behavioural Methods for the Study of Bats, Second Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, US. 2010:567-92.
43.
MoncktonVEllisJLHarlander-MatauschekA. Floor substrate preferences of chickens: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020 Dec 9; 7:584162.
44.
GrimmettRInskippCInskippT. Field Guide to Birds of the Indian Subcontinent: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2016 Oct 20.
45.
GomieroT. Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability. 2016 Mar 18;8(3):281.
46.
MenchJA. Behaviour of fowl and other domesticated birds. The Ethology of Domestic Animals (JensenP., Editor). CAB International, Cambridge, MA. 2009 Jun 24:121-36.
47.
PrateekMishra HKumarVKumarA. Temporal pattern in foraging behaviour of Vanellus malabaricus in relation to different seasons and habitats. Avian Biology Research. 2024 Jun 5;17(1-2):22-30.
48.
BlokhuisHJVan der HaarJ. Effects of pecking incentives during rearing on feather pecking of laying hens. British poultry science. 1992 Mar 1;33(1):17-24.
49.
EnglishPANoceraJJPondBAGreenDJ. Habitat and food supply across multiple spatial scales influence the distribution and abundance of a nocturnal aerial insectivore. Landscape Ecology. 2017 Feb; 32:343-59.
50.
BellWJ. Searching behaviour: the behavioural ecology of finding resources. Springer Science and Business Media; 2012 Dec 6.
51.
SchutzKEJensenP. Effects of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethology. 2001 Aug 12;107(8):753-65.
52.
WoldaH. Seasonal fluctuations in rainfall, food and abundance of tropical insects. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 1978 Jun 1:369-81.
53.
HolmesRTRobinsonSK. Spatial patterns, foraging tactics, and diets of ground-foraging birds in a northern hardwoods forest. The Wilson Bulletin. 1988 Sep 1:377-94.
54.
Del HoyoJDel HoyoJElliottASargatalJ. Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona: Lynx edicions; 1992.
55.
MurrayKA. Factors affecting foraging by breeding farmland birds. Open University (United Kingdom); 2004.
56.
BumpGBumpJW. A study and review of the black francolin and the grey francolin. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife; 1964.
57.
BlizardMA. Dynamics of polyandry in spotted sandpipers (Actitis macularius): Ornamentation, reproductive success, and testosterone. The University of Chicago, 2017.
58.
LoeuilleN.Consequences of adaptive foraging in diverse communities. Functional Ecology. 2010 Feb 1:18-27.
59.
StephensDWBrownJSYdenbergRC, editors. Foraging: behaviour and ecology. University of Chicago Press; 2008 Sep 15.
60.
WarfeDMBarmutaLA. Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia. 2004 Sep; 141:171-8.
61.
PykeGH. Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annual review of ecology and systematics. 1984 Jan 1; 15:523-75.
62.
LiuYQinFLiLDongXLiuLYangL. The Long-term effects of barren land afforestation on plant productivity, soil fertility, and soil moisture in China: a meta-analysis. Plants. 2024 Jun 11;13(12):1614.
63.
SmithJBKeiterDASweeneySJMillerRSSchlichtingPEBeasleyJC. Habitat quality influences trade-offs in animal movement along the exploration–exploitation continuum. Scientific Reports. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4814.
64.
JansenRRobinsonERLittleRMCroweTM. Habitat constraints limit the distribution and population density of redwing francolin, Francolinus levaillantii, in the highland grasslands of Mpumalanga province, South Africa. African Journal of Ecology. 2001 Jun;39(2):146-55.
65.
SchlossbergSKingDIChandlerRBMazzeiBA. Regional synthesis of habitat relationships in shrubland birds. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2010 Sep;74(7):1513-22.
66.
MoffatL.An investigation into the importance of foraging behaviour to laying hens (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph).
67.
CowanMADunlopJAGibsonLAMooreHASetterfieldSANimmoDG. Movement ecology of an endangered mesopredator in a mining landscape. Movement Ecology. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):5.
68.
WhittinghamMJEvansKL. The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis. 2004 Nov; 146:210-20.
69.
TroyJRBaccusJT. Effects of weather and habitat on foraging behaviour of non-breeding Eastern Phoebes. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 2009 Mar;121(1):97-103.
BuhlerRSchalcherKSéchaudRMichlerSApolloniNRoulinAAlmasiB. Influence of prey availability on habitat selection during the non-breeding period in a resident bird of prey. Movement ecology. 2023 Mar 7;11(1):14.
72.
AcebesPMaloJETrabaJ. Trade-offs between food availability and predation risk in desert environments: the case of polygynous monomorphic guanaco (Lama guanicoe). Journal of Arid Environments. 2013 Oct 1; 97:136-42.
73.
NorbergRA. To minimise foraging time, use high‐efficiency, energy‐expensive search and capture methods when food is abundant, but low‐efficiency, low‐cost methods during food shortages. Ecology and Evolution. 2021 Dec;11(23):16537-46.
74.
MilesiFADe CasenaveJLCuetoVR. Selection of foraging sites by desert granivorous birds: vegetation structure, seed availability, species-specific foraging tactics, and spatial scale. The Auk. 2008 Apr 1;125(2):473-84.
75.
BroEMayotPCordaEVReitzF. Impact of habitat management on grey partridge populations: assessing wildlife cover using a multisite BACI experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2004 Oct;41(5):846-57.
76.
KamMDegenAANagyKA. Seasonal energy, water, and food consumption of Negev chukars and sand partridges. Ecology. 1987 Aug;68(4):1029-37.
77.
GrossMC. True metabolizable energy and energetic carrying capacity of submersed aquatic vegetation in semi-permanent marshes of the Upper Midwest. Western Illinois University; 2018.
78.
HerreraCM. Seasonal variation in the quality of fruits and diffuse coevolution between plants and avian dispersers. Ecology. 1982 Jun;63(3):773-85.
79.
SwansonDL. Seasonal metabolic variation in birds: functional and mechanistic correlates. Current ornithology volume 17. 2010:75-129.
80.
TrabaJMoralesMBGarcía de la MorenaELDelgadoMPKristinA. Selection of breeding territory by little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) males in Central Spain: the role of arthropod availability. Ecological Research. 2008 May; 23:615-22.
81.
O'ConnorRJ. The growth and development of birds. (No Title). 1984 Sep.
82.
UllahH. Studies on the biology, habitat, distribution pattern and food of the grey partridge (Francolinus pondicerianus) in Tehsil Faisalabad[Pakistan].
