To explore insights between friendship and mental health through a critical narrative inquiry. To conceptualise friendship and inform public health approaches to loneliness and mental health.
Method:
Seventeen interviews were conducted with middle-age people who had experienced mental health difficulties. Stories were subjected to a narrative analysis and interrogated further using critical theory.
Results:
Compassion in friendship reduces alterity and loneliness, and results in mutual discovery of dignity in relation to distress and stage of life. This is not achievable in all friendship.
Conclusion:
The temporary encounter of friendship can provide new bases for authentically relating. Through dignity and authenticity, friendship can contribute to mental health and reduce loneliness. Suggestions are made to inform public health approaches to friendship.
CacioppoJTFowlerJHChristakisNA.Alone in the crowd: the structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. J Pers Soc Psychol2009;97(6):977–91.
3.
Holt-LunstadJSmithTBBakerM, et alLoneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci2015;10(2):227–37.
4.
FässbergMMvan OrdenKADubersteinP, et alA systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood. Int J Environ Res Public Health2012;9(3):722–45.
5.
NicolaisenMThorsenK.What are friends for? Friendships and loneliness over the lifespan: from 18 to 79 years. Int J Aging Hum Dev2017;84(2): 126–58.
AllanGAdamsRG.Sociology of friendship. In: BryantCPeckD (eds) 21st century sociology: a reference handbook. London: Sage; 2006. p. II-123–31.
8.
AdamsRESantoJBBukowskiWM.The presence of a best friend buffers the effects of negative experiences. Dev Psychol2011;47(6):1786–91.
9.
DemirMÖzenADoğanA, et alI matter to my friend, therefore I am happy: friendship, mattering, and happiness. J Happ Stud2011;12(6):983–1005.
10.
MaloneJCLiuSRVaillantGE, et alMidlife Eriksonian psychosocial development: setting the stage for late-life cognitive and emotional health. Dev Psychol2016;52(3):496–508.
UmemuraTLacinováLMacekP, et alLongitudinal changes in emerging adults’ attachment preferences for their mother, father, friends, and romantic partner: focusing on the start and end of romantic relationships. Int J Behav Develop2017;41(1):136–42.
13.
BadhwarNK.Friends as ends in themselves. Phil Phenomenol Res1997;48(1):1–23.
14.
HruschkaDJ.Friendship: development, ecology and evolution of a relationship. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2010.
15.
RawlinsWK.The compass of friendship: narratives, identities and dialogues. London: Sage; 2009.
16.
FraleyRC.Attachment in adulthood: recent developments, emerging debates and future directions. Ann Rev Psychol2019;70(1):401–22.
17.
Fuller-IglesiasHRWebsterNJAntonucciTC.Adult family relationships in the context of friendship. Res Hum Develop2013;10(2):184–203.
18.
SmartCDaviesKHeaphyB, et alDifficult friendships and ontological insecurity. Soc Rev2012;60(1):91–109.
19.
MooreCFrederickS.Narrative constitution of friendship. Dial: Canad Phil Rev2017;56(1):111–30.
20.
BlattererH.Friendship, recognition and social freedom: a sociological reconstruction. Crit Horiz2018;19(3):198–214.
21.
CockingDKennettJ.Friendship and the self. Ethics1998;108(3):502–27.
22.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM.Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Soc2001;27(1):415–44.
23.
HelmBW.Love, friendship and the self: intimacy, identification and the social nature of persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
24.
BlockPGrundT.Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks. Netw Sci2014;2(2):189–212.
25.
HonnethA.The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1995.
26.
ThornicroftG.Shunned: discrimination against people with mental illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
27.
RiessmanCK.Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage; 2008.
28.
RicoeurP.Word, polysemy, metaphor: creativity in language. In: ValdesMJ (ed.) A Ricoeur reader: reflection and imagination. Toronto, ON, Canada: Toronto University Press; 1991. pp. 65–85.
29.
MaxwellJA.A realist approach for qualitative research. London: Sage; 2012.
30.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ.Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Healt Care2007;19(6):349–57.
31.
LachmanME.Development in midlife. Ann Rev Psychol2004;55:305–31.
32.
KleinmanA.The illness narratives: suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
33.
SadlerGRLeeHCLimRS, et alRecruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nurs Healt Sci2010;12(3):369–74.
34.
LangdridgeD.Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 2007.
35.
JosselsonR.The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrat Inq2004;14(1):1–28.
36.
RashedMA.Madness and the demand for recognition: a philosophical inquiry into identity and mental health activism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
37.
FeeneyBCCollinsNL.New look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Pers Soc Psychol Rev2015;19(2):113–47.
38.
SpaniolLNelsonA.Family recovery. Commun Ment Healt J2015;51(7):761–7.
39.
Hare-DukeLDeningTde OliveiraD, et alConceptual framework for social connectedness in mental disorders: systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Affect Dis2019;245:188–99.
40.
JusdanisG.A tremendous thing: friendship from the Iliad to the Internet. New York: Cornell University Press; 2014.
41.
What Works Wellbeing. A Conceptual Review of Loneliness across the Adult Life Course (16+ Years): Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. Available online at: whatworkswellbeing.org/resources/loneliness-conceptual-review/ (last accessed 13 November 2020).
