Abstract

We read with great interest the original article by Kapila et al., 1 evaluating the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) agents in patients with compensated cirrhosis in a case-control study design. The analysis showed no increase in the rate of decompensation, liver transplant or liver-related mortality or infection in the anti-TNF group. We would like to congratulate the author for conducting a study on this less common but important topic as there is a paucity of data regarding the safety of anti-TNF agents in cirrhotics. However, there are a few issues that need to be addressed.
First, the study is a retrospective analysis, which has a risk of selection and attrition bias. Patients who had a decompensation, infection or mortality may have presented to another hospital.
Second, the median duration of follow-up in the anti-TNF group is 45.2 months. Previous studies on the risk of new cancer or cancer recurrence among patients exposed to anti-TNF therapy showed that malignancy develops after a median duration of 6.8–11.5 years after initiation of anti-TNF.2–4 Hence, longer study duration was required to study the incidence of malignancy in the anti-TNF group.
Third, there are no data on the liver function tests of the patients on anti-TNF. The study mentions that there was no difference in new-onset decompensation between the two groups. However, it is possible that patients in the anti-TNF may have developed drug-induced liver injury/hepatitis, which may contribute to significant morbidity and drug discontinuation.
Finally, the author concluded that there was no difference in the infection rate between patients on anti-TNF and the control group (21.3% versus 15.4%, p = 0.52). However, this conclusion needs to be taken with caution. In a previous systematic review and meta-analysis of 71 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), use of anti-TNF was associated with significantly increased risk of any infections – odds ratio (OR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–1.36, I2 = 46%; serious infections – OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01–1.55, I2 = 0%; and tuberculosis – OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.48–7.33, I2 = 0%, with a moderate level of evidence. 5 Hence, patients on anti-TNF should be closely monitored for infections. Further larger prospectively maintained data are required to study the safety of anti-TNF in patients with cirrhosis.
Footnotes
Author contributions
Conceptualization, drafting, critical revision and final approval were performed by Suprabhat Giri.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
