Digital transformation through extended reality (xR)—comprising virtual, augmented, mixed, and substitutional reality—has become an integral part of the future of clinical and surgical practice. xR technologies facilitate advanced surgical planning, training, therapies and education, reshaping both personal and institutional healthcare. This paper examines the potential changes that xR has introduced into the field of hand surgery, exploring how xR enhances patient-centric care, increases medical service efficiency and revolutionizes surgical training, planning and therapeutic interventions. Key areas such as surgical assistance, telemedicine, therapies and rehabilitation, medical training and education, and improving patient understanding are highlighted. By synthesizing the current literature, this narrative review articulates the theoretical and practical implications of xR, offering insights into its transformative potential and supporting continuous educational advancement in medical practice.
AmerKMMurTAmerKIlyasAM.A mobile-based surgical simulation application: A comparative analysis of efficacy using a carpal tunnel release module. J Hand Surg Am. 2017,
42: 389.e1–389.e9.
2.
BartlettJDLawrenceJEStewartMENakanoNKhandujaV.Does virtual reality simulation have a role in training trauma and orthopaedic surgeons?Bone Joint J. 2018,
100-B: 559–65.
3.
CannonWDGarrettWEJrHunterRE, et al.
Improving residency training in arthroscopic knee surgery with use of a virtual-reality simulator. A randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014,
96: 1798–806.
4.
CarellaMBeckFQuoilinC, et al.
Effect of virtual reality hypnosis on intraoperative sedation needs and functional recovery in knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024: rapm-2023-105261.
5.
ChappellDSonHWClarkAB, et al.
Virtual reality pre-prosthetic hand training with physics simulation and robotic force interaction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2022,
7: 4550–7.
6.
CharissisVZimmerCRSakellariouSChanW.Exploring the simulation requirements for virtual regional anesthesia training. In: McDowallIEDolinskyM (eds) The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality 2010.
SPIE, 2010.
7.
ChauBPhelanITaP, et al.
Immersive virtual reality for pain relief in upper limb complex regional pain syndrome: A pilot study. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2020,
17: 47–52.
8.
CivelekTCokarD.Injection of proximal interphalangeal joint by haptic supported virtual reality environments. Iss Inform. 2016.
9.
CoddAMChoudhuryB.Virtual reality anatomy: is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy?Anat Sci Educ. 2011,
4: 119–25.
10.
Dal MasFMassaroMRippaPSecundoG.The challenges of digital transformation in healthcare: An interdisciplinary literature review, framework, and future research agenda. Technovation. 2023,
123: 102716.
11.
DeshmukhSMurthyPSSinghBContractorI.Virtual Reality as parent education tool in pre-surgical management of cleft lip and palate affected infants—A pilot study. Spec Care Dentist. 2022,
42: 606–11.
EgoziDPerkhulovVKouniavskyLDi Via LoschopeABenklerMBenharushD.DIEP flap preoperative planning using virtual reality based on CT angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022,
10: e4209.
14.
FarukiAANguyenTBGasangwaD-V, et al.
Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022,
17: e0272030.
15.
FreidinDSingoldaRTejman-YardenS, et al.
Using virtual reality for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023,
11: e4773.
16.
GeraldARussoS.Soft sensing and haptics for medical procedures. Nature Reviews Materials. 2024,
9: 86–8.
17.
GuptaRTanwarSTyagiSKumarN.Tactile-internet-based telesurgery system for healthcare 4.0: An architecture, research challenges, and future directions. IEEE Netw. 2019,
33: 22–9.
18.
HeiligML. Sensorama simulator. 3050870, 1962.
19.
HerrenDBVerstrekenFLluchANaquiZvan der HeijdenB.The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hand surgery: A FESSH perspective. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022,
47: 562–7.
20.
HodgesLFKooperRMeyerTC, et al.
Virtual environments for treating the fear of heights. IEEE Computer. 1995,
28: 27–34.
21.
HowellJNConatserRRWilliamsRL2ndBurnsJMElandDC.The virtual haptic back: A simulation for training in palpatory diagnosis. BMC Med Educ. 2008,
8: 14.
22.
HoxhallariEBehrIJBradshawJS, et al.
Virtual reality improves the patient experience during wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet hand surgery: A single-blind, randomized, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019,
144: 408–14.
23.
JavidPAydınAMohannaP-NDasguptaPAhmedK.Current status of simulation and training models in microsurgery: A systematic review. Microsurgery. 2019,
39: 655–68.
24.
KazemiHRappelJKPostonTHai LimBBurdetELeong TeoC.Assessing suturing techniques using a virtual reality surgical simulator. Microsurgery. 2010,
30: 479–86.
25.
KellerMGuebeliAThieringerFHonigmannP.Artificial intelligence in patient-specific hand surgery: A scoping review of literature. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023,
18: 1393–403.
26.
KrausSSchiavoneFPluzhnikovaAInvernizziAC.Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. J Bus Res. 2021,
123: 557–67.
27.
KrishGImmermanIKinjoS.Virtual reality may reduce anxiety and enhance surgical experience during wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet surgery: A report of two cases. J Perioper Pract. 2022,
32: 136–41.
28.
LazarusPPireESapaC, et al.
Design and evaluation of a new synthetic wrist procedural simulator (Wristsim®) for training of distal radius fracture fixation by volar plating. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2017,
36: 275–80.
29.
LeALambersAPFravalAHardidgeABalakumarJ.Utility assessment of virtual reality technology in orthopaedic surgical training. ANZ J Surg. 2023,
93: 2092–6.
30.
LiawrungrueangWTangadulratPHayitaheSWongsiriS.A preliminary report on augmented reality assisted carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Asian Pac2022,
27: 381–4.
31.
LiverneauxPNectouxETalebC.The future of robotics in hand surgery. Chir Main. 2009,
28: 278–85.
32.
LongASAlmeidaMNChongLPrsicA.Live virtual surgery and virtual reality in surgery: Potential applications in hand surgery education. J Hand Surg Am. 2023,
48: 499–505.
33.
Luckykumar DwarkadasATalasilaVChallaRK, Srinivasa.
A review of the application of virtual and augmented reality in physical and occupational therapy. Softw Pract Exp. 2024.
34.
MarguliesIGXuHHendersonPW.Microsurgery training in the digital era: A systematic review of accessible digital resources. Ann Plast Surg. 2020,
85: 337–43.
35.
Matamala-GomezMDiaz GonzalezAMSlaterMSanchez-VivesMV.Decreasing pain ratings in chronic arm pain through changing a virtual body: Different strategies for different pain types. J Pain. 2019,
20: 685–97.
36.
MillerRMackenzieAWelmanTBodgerSHorwitzMD.Establishing the psychological impact of congenital upper limb differences on parents and families. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2024: 17531934241256792.
37.
MokT-NChenJPanJ, et al.
Use of a virtual reality simulator for tendon repair training: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2021,
9: e27544.
38.
MoriMMacDormanKKagekiN.The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2012,
19: 98–100.
39.
MückeTWolffK-DWagenpfeilSHölzleFScholzM.Reliability of near-infrared angiography and micro-Doppler sonography for evaluating microvascular anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010,
126: 1506–14.
40.
MuraseTOkaKMoritomoHGotoAYoshikawaHSugamotoK.Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy of malunited fractures of the upper extremity with use of a computer simulation system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008,
90: 2375–89.
41.
NicaABrailescuCScarletR.Virtual Reality as a method for evaluation and therapy after traumatic hand surgery. Annu Rev Cybertherapy Telemed. 2013,
191: 48–52.
42.
NoarMD.Endoscopy simulation: A brave new world?Endoscopy. 1991,
23: 147–9.
43.
OsumiMInomataKInoueYOtakeYMoriokaSSumitaniM.Characteristics of phantom limb pain alleviated with virtual reality rehabilitation. Pain Med. 2019,
20: 1038–46.
44.
OyamaSSaekiMKanetaSShimodaSYonedaHHirataH.Telerehabilitation based on markerless motion capture and IMT-2020 (5G) networks. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022,
290: 1108–9.
45.
OyamaSNiimiNMoriMHirataH.Intra-articular ultrasonography probe for minimally invasive upper extremity arthroscopic surgery: A phantom study. J Clin Med Res. 2023, 12.
46.
RahmanNANgHJHRajaratnamV.Big data analysis of a dedicated youtube channel as an open educational resource in hand surgery. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2021,
7.
47.
RiegerMGablMGruberHJaschkeWRMallouhiA.CT virtual reality in the preoperative workup of malunited distal radius fractures: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2005,
15: 792–7.
48.
RyuJ-HParkJ-WNahmFS, et al.
The effect of gamification through a virtual reality on preoperative anxiety in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia: A prospective, randomized, and controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2018,
7: 284.
49.
SaekiMOyamaSYonedaH, et al.
Demonstration experiment of telemedicine using ultrasonography and telerehabilitation with 5G communication system in aging and depopulated mountainous area. DIGITAL HEALTH. 2022,
8: 205520762211290.
50.
SatavaRM.Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993,
7: 203–5.
51.
SeymourNGallagherARomanS, et al.
Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002,
236: 458–64.
52.
ShanJ.Study on pain management of hand surgery patients during convalescence. Front Med Biol Eng. 2023.
53.
ShiJXiaJWeiY, et al.
Three-dimensional virtual reality simulation of periarticular tumors using Dextroscope reconstruction and simulated surgery: A preliminary 10-case study. Med Sci Monit. 2014,
20: 1043–50.
54.
ShigiAOkaKTanakaH, et al.
Validation of the registration accuracy of navigation-assisted arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019,
28: 2400–8.
55.
ShiodeROkaKShigiA, et al.
Arthroscopic debridement of elbow osteoarthritis using CT-based computer-aided navigation systems is accurate. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2021,
3: e1687–96.
56.
StoreyKDimanopoulosTAPlummerKKimbleRXiangHGriffinB.Acceptability and usability of Smileyscope virtual reality for paediatric pain management during burn procedures: Perspectives of patients, carers and clinicians. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2024.
57.
StoumposAIKitsiosFTaliasMA.Digital transformation in healthcare: Technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023,
20.
58.
TownsendCBBravoDJonesCMatzonJLIlyasAM.Noise-canceling headphones and music decrease intraoperative patient anxiety during wide-awake hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021,
3: 254–9.
59.
VargasCRNguyenJTAshitateY, et al.
Near-infrared imaging for the assessment of anastomotic patency, thrombosis, and reperfusion in microsurgery: A pilot study in a porcine model. Microsurgery. 2015,
35: 309–14.
60.
YaacoubFHamamYAbcheA.A virtual reality simulator for training wrist arthroscopic surgery. HEALTHINF. 2018: 74–81.
61.
YamamotoMOyamaSOtsukaSMurakamiYYokotaHHirataH.Experimental pilot study for augmented reality-enhanced elbow arthroscopy. Sci Rep. 2021,
11: 4650.
62.
YamamotoTYamamotoNAzumaS, et al.
Near-infrared illumination system-integrated microscope for supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Microsurgery. 2014,
34: 23–7.
63.
ŻelechowskiMFaludiBKarnamMGerigNRauterGCattinPC.Automatic patient positioning based on robot rotational workspace for extended reality. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023,
18: 1951–9.
64.
ZhaoXZhaoHZhengWGohritzAShenYXuW.Clinical evaluation of augmented reality-based 3D navigation system for brachial plexus tumor surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2024,
22: 20.
