As part of the War on Terror, the US conducted at least 378 air and drone strikes in Yemen from 2002 to 2023. While primarily targeting members of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), these strikes have killed over 1,000 people, including more than 125 civilians. This research aims to understand the broader societal impact of US military action as shown on Twitter, now known as ‘X’. The authors take a mixed-methods approach, using both qualitative and quantitative data to investigate this impact. They perform word- and tweet-level analyses on the content and sentiment of a subset of Yemeni Twitter users and contrast the content of Yemeni users’ tweets about US drone strikes with that of US users’ tweets. Finally, the article quantifies the temporal relationship between the frequency and severity of US drone strikes and Twitter activity levels in Yemen, considering the prevalence of Twitter bots.
ACLED (2023) Bringing clarity to crisis. Available at: https://acleddata.com/ (accessed 10 January 2023).
4.
Al-MuslimiF (2013) Statement of Farea Al-Muslimi before drone wars: The constitutional and counterterrorism implications of targeted killing, United States Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights. Available at: https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/04-23-13Al-MuslimiTestimony.pdf (accessed 22 June 2022).
5.
BeckerHNaamanMGravanoL (2011) Beyond trending topics: Real-world event identification on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain, 17–21July, 438–441. Barcelona: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14146/13995 (accessed 8 August 2022).
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) (2023) Telling the stories that matter. Available at: https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/ (accessed 10 January 2023).
9.
BrymanA (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?Qualitative Research6(1): 97–113.
10.
ByronLWattenbergM (2008) Stacked graphs–geometry & aesthetics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics14(6): 1245–1252.
DiaoQ (2015) ‘Event identification and analysis on Twitter’, PhD thesis, Singapore Management University, Singapore.
17.
DoyleLBradyAMByrneG (2009) An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing14(2): 175–185.
18.
Edney-BrowneA (2019) The psychological effects of drone violence: Social isolation, self-objectification, and depoliticization. Political Psychology40(6): 1341–1356.
GreeneJCCaracelliVJGrahamWF (1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis11(3): 255–274.
25.
GreenfieldDHausheerSA (2014) Do drone strikes in Yemen undermine US security objectives? Report, Atlantic Council Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East, October. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/184589/Drone_Strikes_in_Yemen.pdf (accessed 24 June 2022).
26.
GregoryD (2011) From a view to a kill: Drones and late modern war. Theory, Culture & Society28(7/8): 188–215.
27.
HermidaA (2010) Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice4(3): 297–308.
28.
HuMLiuB (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD-2004), Seattle, WA, 22–25August.
McCormickT, et al. (2015) Using Twitter for demographic and social science research: Tools for data collection and processing. Sociological Methods & Research46(3): 390–421. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0049124115605339 (accessed 8 August 2022).
SakakiTOkazakiMMatsuoY (2010) Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, 26–30April: 851–860. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
40.
Sana’a Center for Strategic Studies (2023) Sana’a Center for Strategic Studies. Available at: https://sanaacenter.org/ (accessed 10 January 2023).
41.
SayyadiharikandehM (2020) Detection of novel social bots by ensembles of specialized classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 19–23October, 2725–2732. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
42.
SchroederR (2018) Social Theory after the Internet: Media, Technology, and Globalization. London: UCL Press.
WengJLeeBS (2011) Event detection in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain, 17–21July, 401–408. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
49.
WilliamsSATerrasMMWarwickC (2013) What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation69(3): 384–410.
50.
ZappavignaM (2011) Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society13(5): 788–806.
