The Law of Victims and Land Restitution, ratified in June 2011 and enforced since January 2012, constitutes an unprecedented attempt to end armed conflict in Colombia by applying a transitional justice framework and fostering rural development. Drawing on a methodology that integrates framing and rhetorical analysis, this article analyses the role of seven national and local Colombian newspapers in promoting governmental or alternative actors and frames regarding institutional, developmental, and peace and human rights agendas linked to this legislation. In addition, it evaluates the influence of rhetorical framing on media’s role and the resulting quality of media coverage. The results show that the media promoted governmental frames regarding institutional and developmental issues, and alternative frames advocated by other actors in relation to peace and human rights issues. In addition, they confirm the key importance of rhetorical framing in shaping that role. This was detrimental to the quality of media coverage geared towards sustainable peace and human development.
Aristóteles (2007) Arte poética: Arte retórica. Mexico: Editorial Porrúa.
3.
AyolaC (2012) Tierras Malditas. El Heraldo, 4March.
4.
BarberoJM (1998) De los Medios a las Mediaciones: Comunicación, Cultura y Hegemonía. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gilli.
5.
BarberoJM (2002) Oficio de Cartógrafo: Travesías Latinoamericanas de la Comunicación en la Cultura. Mexico, DF and Santiago de Chile: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
6.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press–state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–125.
7.
BennettWLLawrenceR (1995) News icons and the mainstreaming of social change. Journal of Communication45(3): 20–39.
8.
BennettWLPaletzDL (eds) (1994) Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BennettWLLawrenceRLivingstonS (2007) When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Betín del RíoT (2012) Negociadores del Gobieno con las FARC no representan a nadie del sector rural ni ganadero. El Heraldo, 25November: 6B.
11.
BonillaME (2012) El experimento de las Catas. El País, 30January.
12.
CârlanACioceaM (2014) Media deliberation on intra-EU migration: A qualitative approach to framing based on rhetorical analysis. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations16(3). Available at: http://journalofcommunication.ro/oldsite/archive2/035/35/carlan_ciocea.pdf (accessed 15 January 2017).
13.
CarranzaR (2008) Plunder and pain: Should transitional justice engage with corruption and economic crimes?International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 310–330.
14.
CastroR, Colprensa (2012) El mayor despojado es el Gobierno. El País, 13March: A4.
Colprensa (2012a) Farc, sin discurso politico por restitución de tierras: Santos. El Colombiano, 30January: 3B.
17.
Colprensa (2012b) La ley de tierras se debe cumplir aunque no tenga enemigos. Hoy Diario del Magdalena, 7January: 2A.
18.
DancyGWiebelhaus-BrahmE (2015) Bridge to human development or vehicle of inequality? Transitional justice and economic structures. International Journal of Transitional Justice9: 51–69.
19.
De GreiffP (2009) Articulating the links between transitional justice and development: Justice and social integration. In: De GreiffPDuthieR (eds) Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections. Brooklyn, NYSocial Science Research Council, 28–75.
20.
Díaz RodríguezA (2009) La argumentación escrita. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
21.
DuthieR (2008) Toward a development-sensitive approach to transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 292–309.
22.
El Heraldo (2012) En Córdoba denuncian la revictimización de 173 mil desplazados, 10April: 2B.
23.
El Meridiano de Córdoba (2013) Ley sin dientes, 13May: 4A.
24.
EntmanRM (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air accidents. Journal of Communication41(4): 6–26.
25.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
26.
EntmanRM (2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication20: 415–432.
27.
EntmanRM (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
EsqueaJG (2012) La restitución de tierras no la para nadie. Hoy Diario del Magdalena, 4August: 2A.
29.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructivist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
García SierraA (2013) Hemos puesto al agro al frente de la agenda pública. El País, 17March: 16A.
32.
GoffmanE (1975) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Penguin Books.
33.
HallS. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging the State, and Law and Order. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
34.
HallinD (1986) The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
35.
HamblinL (1998) Fallacies. New York: Vale Press.
36.
HermanEDChomskyN (1994) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: Vintage.
37.
Hoy Diario del Magdalena (2012a) Santos afirma que la revolución agraria es integral, 28January: 3A.
38.
Hoy Diario del Magdalena (2012b) Gobierno, diligente con las víctimas, 31May: 3A.
39.
HugginsC (2009) Linking broad constellations of ideas: Transitional justice, land tenure reform, and development. In: De GreiffPDuthieR (eds) Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections. Brooklyn, NY: Social Science Research Council, 332–374.
40.
KuypersJ (2010) Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. In: D’AngeloPKuypersJ (eds) Doing Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 286–311.
LakoffGJohnsonM (2001) Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.
43.
LaplanteLJ (2008) Transitional justice and peace building: Diagnosing and addressing the socioeconomic roots of violence through a human rights framework. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 331–355.
44.
LawrenceR (2000) The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
Ley de Víctimas y Restitución de Tierras (2011) Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho, República de Colombia. Imprenta Nacional de Colombia, 10June.
46.
MacíasJA (2012) Víctimas, preocupadas por falta de resultados en la restitución. El Colombiano, 10June: 15A.
47.
MaltbyS (2012) Military Media Management: Negotiating the ‘Front’ Line in Mediatized War. Abingdon: Routledge.
48.
ManiR (2008) Editorial: Dilemmas of expanding transitional justice, or forging the nexus between transitional justice and development. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 253–265.
49.
Martínez CortésP (2013) Ley de Víctimas y Restitución de Tierras en Colombia en contexto: Un análisis de las contradicciones entre el modelo agrario y la reparación a las víctimas, December. Berlín: Forschungs- und Dokumentationszentrum and Transnational Institute (TNI). Available at: https://www.tni.org/files/download/martinez-ley-de-victimas-web.pdf (accessed 1 July 2016).
50.
McNairB (2007) An Introduction to Political Communication, 4th edn.London: Routledge.
51.
MelendezJE (2013) Gobierno va por 500.000 hectáreas robadas por las FARC. El Tiempo, February, 21: 2.
52.
MillerZ (2008) Effects of invisibility: In search of the ‘economic’ in transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 266–291.
53.
Ministerio de Justicia (2011) Ley de Víctimas y Restitución de Tierras y sus Decretos Reglamentarios. República de Colombia: Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho.
Monroy GiraldoJC (2012) ‘Corrupción facilitó robo de 700 mil Hectáreas’: Santos. El Colombiano, 13January: 11A.
56.
Montoya LondoñoC (2011) Framing Event-Driven News: The Promotion of the US Agenda in the Colombian Armed Conflict through the Pages of El Tiempo Newspaper. Bogota: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
57.
Montoya LondoñoCVallejo MejíaM (2016) The law of victims and land restitution in Colombia: Public debates and ‘glocal’ agendas. Latin American Policy7(1): 80–105.
58.
MuvingiI (2009) Sitting on powder kegs: Socioeconomic rights in transitional societies. International Journal of Transitional Justice3: 163–182.
59.
PanZKosickiG (1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication10: 55–75.
60.
Pardo AbrilNG (2013) Despojo en la caricatura: metáfora multimodal. Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade14: 107–127.
61.
PasipanodyaT (2008) A deeper justice: Economic and social justice as transitional justice in Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 378–397.
62.
PerelmanCOlbrechts-TytechaL (1989) Tratado de la argumentación: La Nueva Retórica. Barcelona: Gredos.
63.
Política (2012) ‘Este es el Gobierno de los campesinos!’: Santos. El Tiempo, 28January: 4.
64.
Presidencia de la República (2010) Gobierno superó la meta de entregar en su primer año 350 mil hectáreas de tierras a víctimas de la violencia. Presidency Republic of Colombia, 3August. Available at: http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Prensa/2011/Agosto/Paginas/20110803_01.aspx (accessed 5 September 2013).
Redacción Locales (2012) Tierras para la locomotora del agro. El Heraldo, 27January: 6A.
67.
Redacción Política (2012) Restitución, más allá de los anuncios. El Espectador, 29May: 7.
68.
Reyes PosadaA (2016) La reforma rural para la paz. Agencia GIZ-Gesellschaft Für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. Bogotá: Penguin Random House.
69.
RobinsonP (2002) The CNN Effect: The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. London: Routledge.
70.
RobinsonP. (2010) Pockets of Resistance: British News Media, War and Theory in the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
71.
RobledoJE (2012) El gobierno ha faltado a la verdad: no se ha restituido una sola hectárea de tierra. La restitución como cortina de humo a las peores políticas agrarias (speech by Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo in the debate about land restitution, Senate Plenary Session), 29May. Available at: http://www.moir.org.co/El-gobierno-ha-faltado-a-la-verdad.html (accessed 26 November 2013).
Roth-ArriazaNOrlovskyK (2009) A complementary relationship: Reparations and development. In: De GreiffPDuthieR (eds) Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections. Brooklyn, NY: Social Science Research Council, 170–213.
74.
SánchezTJr (2013) Entre marchas, cinismos, olvido, muerte y educación. El Meridiano de Córdoba, 13April: 5A.
75.
SantosJM (2012) Palabras del Presidente Juan Manuel Santos en la conmemoración del Día Nacional de la Memoria y Solidaridad con las Víctimas. Presidency Republic of Colombia, 9April. Available at: http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Prensa/2012/Abril/Paginas/20120409_09.aspx (accessed 15 November 2013).
76.
SchlesingerPTumberH (1994) Reporting Crime: The Media Politics of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
77.
Toscano MonterrosaL (2013) Sucre, primero con parque de víctimas. El Heraldo, 6January: 6B.
78.
Unidad de Restitución de Tierras (2017) Estadísticas de Restitución de Tierras: Registro de Tierras Despojadas y Abandonadas Forzosamente. Fecha de Corte 1 de Julio de 2016. Land Restitution Unit, Colombian Government. Available at: https://www.restituciondetierras.gov.co/estadisticas-de-restitucion-de-tierras (accessed 26 January 2017).
79.
ValeroDMeléndezJE (2012) El despojo de tierras que no quieren reconocer las FARC. El Tiempo, 28October: 2.
80.
Vallejo MejíaMMontoya LondoñoC (2014) Movimiento de tierra en la prensa nacional (Movement of land in the national press), Revista Javeriana, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, February: 8–19.
81.
Vallejo MejíaMMontoya LondoñoC (2015) Ley de víctimas y restitución de tierras en Colombia: Encuadres retóricos sembrados de metáforas (Law of victims and land restitution in Colombia: Rhetorical framing and growing metaphors), Análisis Político84, IEPRI, May– August: 23–38. Available at: http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/anpol/article/viewFile/54637/54088 (accessed 5 May 2017).
82.
Vallejo MejíaMMontoya LondoñoC (2017) Los cercos del debate sobre restitución de tierras: Encuadres retórios de la Ley 1448 en la prensa colombiana nacional y regional (2012–2013). Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
83.
Vélez-LópezAC (2013) A la zaga de lo político: La agenda mediática de la Ley de Víctimas y Restitución de Tierras. Co-herencia10(18): 79–103.
84.
WolfsfeldG (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
