This article analyses the function of opening sequences in war films. With reference to Erll’s studies on film and memory, the author suggests that, besides initiating processes of framing film worlds, opening sequences also activate a certain memory-making rhetoric that enables potential impacts on historical discourse and memory politics. He subdivides this last function into three rhetorical modes of cultural memory – an objectifying, subjective and reflexive approach. Subsequently, the author provides close readings of the opening sequences of various contemporary war films to exemplify and illustrate each function and rhetorical mode. In conclusion, the author connects a recent surge in films employing a subjective and reflexive rhetoric to changes in imaging technologies.
ErllA (2005) Kollektives Gedächtnis und Erinnerungskulturen. Stuttgart: Verlag JB Metzler.
9.
ErllA (2008) Literature, film, and the mediality of cultural memory. In: ErllANünningA (eds) Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 389–398.
10.
GardiesA (2006) Am Anfang war der Vorspann. In: BöhnkeA. (eds) Das Buch zum Vorspann: ‘The Title is a Shot’. Berlin: Vorwerk8, 21–33.
11.
HallS (1980) Encoding/Decoding. In: BaronS. (eds) Culture, Media, Language (Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–1979). London: Routledge, 128–138.
12.
HartmannB (1995) Anfang, Exposition, Initiation: Perspektiven einer pragmatischen Texttheorie des Filmanfangs. Montage a/v4(2): 101–122.
13.
HoskinsAO’LoughlinB (2010) War and Media: The Emergence of Diffused War. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
KellnerD (1995) Media Culture, Cultural Studies: Identity, and Politics between the Modern and the Postmodern. London: Routledge.
15.
KuribayashiT (2006) Picture Letters From the Commander in Chief. San Francisco: VIZ Media.
16.
LaclauEMouffeC (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso: London.
17.
MooreHGGallowayJL (1992) We Were Soldiers Once … and Young. New York: Random House.
18.
NicholsB (1991) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
OdinR (2006) Der Eintritt des Zuschauers in die Fiktion. In: BöhnkeA. (eds) Das Buch zum Vorspann: ‘The Title is a Shot’. Berlin: Vorwerk8: 34–41.
20.
PistersP (2010) Logistics of perception 2.0: Multiple screen aesthetics in Iraq War films. Film-Philosophy14(1): 232–252.
21.
PötzschH (2012, forthcoming) Beyond mimesis: War, memory, and history in Eastwood’s Flags of Our Fathers. In: SchubartRGjelsvikA (eds) Eastwood’s Iwo Jima: A Critical Engagement With ‘Flags of our Fathers’ and ‘Letters from Iwo Jima’. London: Wallflower Press.
22.
RussellJ (2009) Lights, camera, incoming! How YouTube rewrote the war movie. In: SlaterJ (ed.) Under Fire: A Century of War Movies. Hersham: Ian Allen Publishing, 257–268.
23.
SaidEW (1985) Beginnings: Intention & Method. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
SkareR (2012, forthcoming) ‘Das Leben der Anderen’ (2006): Paratekstens betydning for filmens autentisitetskrav. Norsk Medietidsskrift191.
25.
StamR (2000) Film Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
26.
StanitzekG (2005) Texts and paratexts in media. Critical Inquiry32(1): 27–42.
27.
StanitzekG (2009) Reading the title sequence (Vorspann, Générique). Cinema Journal48(4): 44–58.
28.
SwoffordA (2003) Jarhead. London: Scribner.
29.
TröhlerM (2002) Von Weltenkonstellationen und Textgebäuden: Fiktion – Nichtfiktion – Narration in Spiel- und Dokumentarfilm. Montage a/v11(2): 9–41.
30.
ToffolettiKGraceV (2010) Terminal indifference: The Hollywood war film post September 11. Film-Philosophy14(2): 62–83.
31.
VirilioP (1989) War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception. London: Verso.
