Productivity implications for generative AI role-based prompts as a networked hermeneutic

Abstract

Keywords

Explainability facilitation generative AI productivity role-based prompts simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Button

Dourish

(1996) Technomethodology: Paradoxes and possibilities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’96), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13–18 April 1996, pp.19–26. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Gordon

Negreanu

Cambronero

, et al. (2023) Co-audit: Tools to help humans double-check AI-generated content. In: PLATEAU 2024, 14th annual workshop on the intersection of HCI and PL, Berkeley, CA, USA, 19–20 February 2024. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Housley

Dahl

(2024) Membership categorisation, sociological description and role prompt engineering with Chat GPT. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 848–858.

Qureshi

(2023) Waluigi, Carl Jung, and the case for moral AI. Wired, 25 May. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/waluigi-effect-generative-artificial-intelligence-morality/ (accessed 26 January 2024).

Tankelevitch

Kewenig

Simkute

, et al. (2024) The metacognitive demands and opportunities of generative AI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘24), Honolulu, HI, USA, 11–16 May 2024. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.