The case of Mesut Özil: A symbol of (non-) integration? An analysis of German print media discourses on integration

Abstract

This paper examines how German media discourses reflect debates around integration, based on a newspaper corpus spanning the period 2008–2018. Considering these discourses, our research interest is focussed on how integration is constructed as a responsibility of those who are expected to integrate into society. To analyze how media might play a role in reproducing essentialist constructions of difference, we present a case study that combines methodologies of corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis, and that examines discursive practices and strategies linked to dominant discourses about integration in Germany. Our findings show that in the German context, certain ethnicities (here: people of Turkish background) are framed as “other” and these groups are constantly being assessed in terms of integration in ways that others are not.

Keywords

Constructions of difference corpus linguistics critical discourse analysis discourse-historical analysis discourses on integration discursive practices discursive strategies German newspapers integration of migrants migration to Germany newspaper corpus print media qualitative content analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadi

D’Haenens

Roe

, et al. (2016) Leitkultur and discourse hegemonies: German mainstream media coverage on the integration debate between 2009 and 2014. International Communication Gazette 78(6): 557–584.

Ahlstrand

(2019) A critical discourse analysis of women, power, and social-political change in the Indonesian online news media. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.

Ahmed

Matthes

(2017) Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette 79(3): 219–244.

Baker

Gabrielatos

KhosraviNik

, et al. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306.

Baker

Gabrielatos

McEnery

(2013) Sketching Muslims: The big picture. In: Baker

Gabrielatos

McEnery

(eds) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.35–66.

Berger

Luckmann

(1967) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

Bigo

(2002) Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives 27(1_suppl): 63–92.

Bubenhofer

(2009) Sprachgebrauchsmuster. Korpuslinguistik als Methode der Diskurs- und Kulturanalyse. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Bubenhofer

(2018) Visualisierungen in der Korpuslinguistik. Diagrammatische Operationen zur Gegenstandkonstitution, -analyse und Ergebnispräsentation. In: Kupietz

Schmidt

(eds) Germanistische Sprachwissenschaft um 2020: Korpuslinguistik (5). Berlin: De Gruyter, pp.27–60.

10.

Collyer

Hinger

Schweitzer

(2020) Politics of (dis)integration – An introduction. In: Hinger

Schweitzer

(eds) Politics of Disintegration. Springer Open, pp.1–18. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25089-8_1.

11.

Creswell

Fetters

Ivankova

(2004) Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine 2(1): 7–12.

12.

De Cillia

Wodak

(2018) Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten 1995–2015. Aus Politik Und Zeitgeschichte 34–35: 48–54.

13.

Duffy

Rowden

(2005) You are what you read? How newspaper readership is related to views. Innovation & Knowledge. ipsos MORI. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/you-are-what-you-read (accessed 8 April 2021).

14.

Dunn

(2001) Representations of Islam in the politics of mosque development in Sydney. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 92: 291–308.

15.

Fairclough

Wodak

(1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van Dijk

(ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE, pp.258–284.

16.

Feltham-King

Macleod

(2016) How content analysis may complement and extend the insights of discourse analysis: An example of research on constructions of abortion in South African newspapers 1978–2005. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 15: 1–9.

17.

Flubacher

M-C

Yeung

(2016) Discourses of integration: Language, skills, and the politics of difference. Multilingua 35(6): 599–616.

18.

Fortier

A-M

(2012) The migration imaginary and the politics of personhood. In: Messer

Schroeder

Wodak

(eds) Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Springer, pp.31–43.

19.

Fuller

(2018) Immigration, integration and Leitkultur in German newspapers: Competing discourses about national belonging. Studii de Lingvistica 8: 175–189.

20.

Fuller

(2019) Discourses of immigration and integration in German newspaper comments. In: Viola

Musolff

(eds) Migration and Media. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.317–338.

21.

Gabrielatos

Baker

(2008) Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38.

22.

Hardt-Mautner

(1995) ‘How does one become a good European?’ The British press and European integration. Discourse & Society 6(2): 177–205.

23.

Hastings

Manning

(2004) Introduction: Acts of alterity. Language & Communication 24(4): 291–311.

24.

Heinkelmann-Wild

Beck

Spencer

(2019) Heroes welcome: An exceptional story of ‘good’ refugees in the German tabloid discourse. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 14(3): 220–239.

25.

Henkelmann

(2012) Migration, Sprache und kulturelles Kapital. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

26.

Herrera

Braumoeller

(2004) Symposium: Discourse and content analysis. Qualitative Methods 2(1): 15–19.

27.

KhosraviNik

Krzyzanowski

Wodak

(2012) Dynamics of representation in discourse: Immigrants in the British press. In: Messer

Schroeder

Wodak

(eds) Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Springer, pp.283–296.

28.

Koller

Mautner

(2004) Computer applications in critical discourse analysis. In: Coffin

Hewings

O’Halloran

(eds) Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches. London: Hodder and Stoughton, pp.216–228.

29.

Kuckartz

(2014) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

30.

Kwon

Clarke

Wodak

(2014) Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. Journal of Management Studies 51(2): 265–290.

31.

Mayring

(2014) Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt: Open Access Repository. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 (accessed 8 April 2021).

32.

Möllering

(2010) Citizenship testing and linguistic integration in Australia and Germany. In: Slade

Möllering

(eds) From Migrant to Citizen: Testing Language, Testing Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.145–163.

33.

Morley

Taylor

(2012) Us and them: How immigrants are constructed in British and Italian newspapers. In: Bayley

Williams

(eds) European Identity: What the Media Say. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.190–223.

34.

Musolff

Viola

(2019) Migration and media: An interview with Andreas Musolff and Lorella Viola. Interviewed by Eastminster. 5 February 2019. Available at: http://www.ueapolitics.org/2019/02/05/migration-and-media-an-interview-with-andreas-musolff-and-lorella-viola/ (accessed 8 April 2021).

35.

Özil

(2018) II/III MEDIA & SPONSORS [Tweet]. Twitter. Available at: https://twitter.com/MesutOzil1088/status/1021017944745226242 (accessed 6 April 2021).

36.

Parr

(2015) Nationalstereotype im internationalen Fußball. Historical Social Research 40(4): 298–309.

37.

Perdue

Dovidio

Gurtman

, et al. (1990) Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(3): 475–486.

38.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.

39.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2009) The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd revision edn. London: SAGE, pp.87–121.

40.

Schinkel

(2018) Against ‘immigrant integration’: For an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies 6(1): 31.

41.

Schreier

(2012) Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: SAGE.

42.

Schreier

(2013) Qualitative content analysis. In: Flick

(ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, pp.170–183.

43.

Stryker

Burke

(2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63(4): 284–297.

44.

Stubbs

(1994) Grammar, text, and ideology: Computer-assisted methods in the linguistics of representation. Applied Linguistics 15(2): 201–223.

45.

Van Dijk

(1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.

46.

Van Dijk

(2000) New(s) racism: A discourse analytical approach. In: Cottle

(ed.) Ethnic Minorities and the Media. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press, pp.211–226.

47.

Van Dijk

(2001) Critical discourse analysis. In: Tannen

Schiffrin

Hamilton

(eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.352–371.

48.

Van Dijk

(2009) Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

49.

Van Leeuwen

(1996) The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-Coulthard

Coulthard

(eds) Texts and practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp.32–70.

50.

Van Leeuwen

(2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

51.

Vollmer

Karakayali

(2018) The volatility of the discourse on refugees in Germany. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 118–139.

52.

Widdowson

(2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA Oxford: Blackwell Publications.

53.

Wilson

(1993) Towards an integration of content analysis and discourse analysis: The automatic linkage of key relations in text. Available at: http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol3.pdf (accessed 8 April 2021).

54.

Wodak

(2001) The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak

Reisigl

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp.63–95.

55.

Wodak

(2015) The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

56.

Wodak

(2018) Discourse and European integration.Kolleg-Forschergruppe “The Transformative Power of Europe.” KFG Working Paper Series 86. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Available at: https://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/working_paper/wp/wp86/WP_86_Wodak_Druck_und_Web.pdf (accessed 8 April 2021).

57.

Wodak

de Cillia

Reisigl

, et al. (2009) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

58.

Wodak

Kargl

De Cillia

, et al. (1999) Zur diskursiven Konstruktion nationaler Identität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

59.

Wodak

Meyer

(2009) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.