Recent decades have witnessed an increase in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) visibility in the British media. Increased representation has not been equally distributed, however, as bisexuality remains an obscured sexual identity in discourses of sexuality. Through the use of diachronic corpus-based critical discourse analysis, this study seeks to uncover how bisexual people have been represented in the British press between 1957 and 2017. By specifically focusing on the discursive construction of bisexuality in The Times, the results reveal how bisexual people are represented as existing primarily in discourses of the past or in fiction. The Times corpus also reveals significant variation in the lexical meaning of bisexual throughout the 60 years in question. These findings contribute to contemporary theories of bisexual erasure which posit that bisexual people are denied the same ontological status as monosexual identities, that is, homosexuality and heterosexuality.
AngelidesS (2001) A History of Bisexuality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AngelidesS (2006) Historicizing (bi)sexuality. Journal of Homosexuality52(1–2): 125–158.
3.
BakerP (2005) Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
4.
BakerP (2010) Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
5.
BakerP (2014) Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.
6.
BakerPGabrielatosCMcEneryT (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ButlerJ (1991) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
8.
Du PlessisM (1996) Blatantly bisexual; or, unthinking queer theory. In: PramaggioreMHallDE (eds) Representing Bisexualities: Subjects and Cultures of Fluid Desire. New York: NYU Press. pp.19–54
9.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
10.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
11.
FoucaultM (1978) The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.
12.
hooksb (1992) Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston, MA: South End Press.
13.
JohnsonH (2016) Bisexuality, mental health, and media representation. Journal of Bisexuality16(3): 378–396.
14.
KilgarriffARychlyPSmrzPet al. (2004) Itri-04-08 the sketch engine. Information Technology105:116.
15.
KaestleCIvoryA (2012) A forgotten sexuality: Content analysis of bisexuality in the medical literature over two decades. Journal of Bisexuality12(1): 35–48.
16.
KilgarriffAKovářVKrekSet al. (2010) A quantitative evaluation of word sketches. Proceedings of the 14th EURALEX International Congress: 372–379.
17.
MacDowallL (2009) Historicising contemporary bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality9(1): 3–15.
18.
McEneryTBakerH (2017a) Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. London: Bloomsbury.
19.
McEneryTBakerH (2017b) The public representation of homosexual men in seventeenth-century England – A corpus based view. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics3(2): 197–217.
PartingtonADuguidATaylorC (2013) Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
23.
Paz GalupoMRamirezJPulice-FarrowL (2017) ‘Regardless of their gender’: Descriptions of sexual identity among bisexual, pansexual, and queer identified individuals. Journal of Bisexuality17(1): 108–124.
24.
RychlýP (2008) A lexicographer-friendly association score. In: Proceedings of 2nd workshop on recent advances in slavonic natural languages processing (RASLAN), Karlova Studánka, 5–7 December, vol. 2, pp. 6–9. Available at: https://nlp.fi.muni.cz/raslan/2008/raslan08.pdf
