Sticker use is an increasingly popular part of daily messaging activity. However, little is known regarding the types, functions, and outcomes of sticker use in authentic online communications. To investigate these phenomena, we analysed sticker use in five small mobile-messaging-facilitated discussion groups initiated by students for course projects in an Asian university. The students used four types of stickers, among which ‘animated picture without text’ was the most frequent. Sticker functions fell into two main categories: as a tone indicator with scope over a textual message, and as a stand-alone illocutionary act. Based on interviews with seven participants, we found disparities between the sender’s intention and the receiver’s interpretation for 34.7% of the stickers, but these disparities did not adversely affect the communication. Implications of the findings are discussed.
AhnWParkJHanK (2011) Emoticons convey emotion in CMC. In: Proceedings of BCS conference on HCI, Swindon, 4–8 July, pp.429–430. Swindon: British Computer Society.
2.
Al-MaroofRSSalloumSAAl-HamadandAQM, et al. (2019) A unified model for the use and acceptance of stickers in social media messaging. In: International conference on advanced intelligent systems and informatics, Cairo, Egypt, 26 October, pp.370–381. Cham: Springer.
3.
AustinJL (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AzumaJEbnerM (2008) A stylistic analysis of graphic emoticons: Can they be candidates for a universal visual language of the future? In: EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology, Vienna, Austria, 30 June, pp.972–979. Waynesville, NC: AACE.
5.
ByronKBaldridgeDC (2007) E-mail recipients’ impressions of senders’ likability: The interactive effect of nonverbal cues and recipients’ personality. The Journal of Business Communication44(2):137–160.
6.
ChaYKimJParkS, et al. (2018) Complex and ambiguous: Understanding sticker misinterpretations in instant messaging. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2: 1–22.
7.
ChangCYH (2016) EFL reviewers’ emoticon use in asynchronous computer-mediated peer response. Computers and Composition40: 1–18.
8.
ChenXSiuKWM (2017) Exploring user behaviour of emoticon use among Chinese youth. Behaviour & Information Technology36(6): 637–649.
9.
ClarkHHBrennanSE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: ResnickLBLevineJTeasleySD (eds) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp.127–149.
10.
DerksDFischerAHBosAE (2008) The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior24(3): 766–785.
11.
de SetaG (2018) Biaoqing: The circulation of emoticons, emoji, stickers, and custom images on Chinese digital media platforms. First Monday23(9). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v23i9.9391.
12.
DresnerEHerringSC (2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory20(3): 249–268.
FengYQiuMLiY, et al. (2016) Cross-culture business communication by emoji in GMS. In: Proceedings of the 2016 international symposium on business cooperation and development, November, pp.181–186. Kunming, China: Atlantis Press.
GeJ (2020) The anatomy of memetic stickers: An analysis of sticker competition on Chinese social media. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM workshop, Atlanta, GA, June. DOI: 10.36190/2020.01.
17.
GeJHerringSC (2018) Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo. First Monday23. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v23i11.9413.
18.
GlaserBStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
19.
GunawardenaC (1995) Social presence theory and implications of interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferencing. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications1: 147–166.
20.
HerringSC (2004) Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In: BarabSAKlingRGrayJH (eds) Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.338–376.
21.
HerringSCDainasAR (2017) “Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, 4–7 January, pp.2185–2194. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
22.
HuTGuoHSunH, et al. (2017) Spice up your chat: The intentions and sentiment effects of using emojis. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international AAAI conference on web and social media, Montreal, Canada, 3 May, pp.102–111. Palo Alto: AAAI.
23.
JessicaGFranziaE (2017) The analysis of line sticker character “Cony Special Edition.”Humaniora8: 291–301.
24.
KatoSKatoYOzawaY (2018). Exploring potential factors in sticker use among Japanese young adults: Effects of gender and text messaging dependency. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking10(2): 1–23.
25.
KatsunoHYanoC (2007) Kaomoji and expressivity in a Japanese housewives’ chat room. In: DanetBHerringSC (eds) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.278–301.
26.
KonradAHerringSCChoiD (2020) Sticker and emoji use in Facebook Messenger: Implications for graphicon change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(3): 217–235.
27.
LeeJYHongNKimS, et al. (2016) Smiley face: Why we use emoticon stickers in mobile messaging. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on HCI with mobile devices and services adjunct, Florence, Italy, 6 September, pp.760–766. New York, NY: ACM.
LinellP (1995) Troubles with mutualities: Towards a dialogical theory of misunderstanding and miscommunication. In: MarkovaIGraumannCFFoppaK (eds) Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.176–213.
30.
LuY (2019) Beyond just smile and tears: Functions and reasons for use of the emoji “face with tears of joy” in computer-mediated conversation. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences16(1): 60–105.
31.
McLaughlinML (1984) Conversation: How Talk is Organised. London: Sage Publications.
PowellMJ (1985) Purposive vagueness: An evaluative dimension of vague quantifying expressions. Journal of Linguistics21: 31–50.
34.
RashdiFA (2018) Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis. Discourse, Context & Media26: 117–126.
35.
RodriguesDLopesDPradaM, et al. (2017) A frown emoji can be worth a thousand words: Perceptions of emoji use in text messages exchanged between romantic partners. Telematics and Informatics34(8): 1532–1543.
36.
SakaiN (2013) The role of sentence closing as an emotional marker: A case of Japanese mobile phone e-mail. Discourse, Context & Media2(3): 149–155.
37.
SchegloffEASacksH (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8: 289–327.
38.
SearleJ (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SkovholtKGrønningAKankaanrantaA (2014) The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(4): 780–797.
SugiyamaS (2015) Kawaii Meiru and Maronaka Neko: Mobile emoji for relationship maintenance and aesthetic expression among Japanese teens. First Monday20(10). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v20i10.5826.
SunH (2005) Collaborative strategies in Chinese telephone conversation closings: Balancing procedural needs and interpersonal meaning making. Pragmatics15: 109–128.
45.
TangYHewKF (2019) Emoticon, emoji, and sticker use in computer-mediated communication: A review of theories and research findings. International Journal of Communication13: 2457–2483.
46.
ThompsonDFilikR (2016) Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(2): 105–120.
47.
TolinsJSamermitP (2016) GIFs as embodied enactments in text-mediated conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction49(2): 75–91.
48.
TungFWDengYS (2007) Increasing social presence of social actors in e-learning environments: Effects of dynamic and static emoticons on children. Displays28(4–5): 174–180.
49.
UtzS (2000) Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior1. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-14046-001 (accessed 11 February 2021).
50.
VandergriffI (2013) Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics51: 1–12.
WangSS (2016) More than words? The effect of line character sticker use on intimacy in the mobile communication environment. Social Science Computer Review34(4): 456–478.
53.
WangYLiYGuiX, et al. (2019) Culturally-embedded visual literacy: A study of impression management via emoticon, emoji, sticker, and meme on social media in China. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3: 1–24.
54.
WangWZhaoYQiuL, et al. (2014) Effects of emoticons on the acceptance of negative feedback in computer-mediated communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems15(8): 454–483.
55.
WeinerSLGoodenoughDR (1977) A move toward a psychology of conversation. In: FreedleRO (ed.) Discourse Production and Comprehension. Nonvood, NJ: Ablex, pp.213–255.
YinRK (2017) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications.
58.
ZipfGK (2016) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Boston: Addison-Wesley Press.
59.
ZhouRHentschelJKumarN (2017) Goodbye text, hello emoji: Mobile communication on WeChat in China. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, 2 May, pp.748–759. New York, NY: ACM.
