Focusing on Weibo (a Chinese Microblogging site) and Twitter, this study adopts computer-mediated discourse analysis to examine how influencers use emoji sequences when engaging in self-presentation. It identified a variety of text-based speech acts, emoji functions, and functional relations by conducting speech act and pragmatic function analysis. ‘Claim’ is the most common text-based speech act accompanying with emoji sequences in both data groups; however, the former had a higher percentage than the later. Moreover, emoji functioning as a combination of ‘stance and action’ in sequences comprise the most prominent category in the Twitter data, whereas the ‘concept’ function accounts for the largest percentage within the Weibo data. Finally, emoji sequences serving as ‘emphasis on text’ is most employed in connection with accompanying texts in both data. This study also observed how a lack of user-desired emoji may be compensated for through collocation of emoji sequences, a device which involves significant creativity and intricacy.
AiWLuXLiuX, et al. (2017) Untangling emoji popularity through semantic embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 11th International AAAI on Web Social Media, pp. 2–11. Montreal.
2.
BachKHarnishRM (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: M.I.T Press.
3.
BarbieriFKruszewskiGRonzanoF, et al. (2016) How cosmopolitan are emojis: Exploring emojis usage and meaning over different languages with distributional semantics. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, pp.531–535. New York: ACM.
4.
BauerMWGaskellG (2000) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook for Social Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5.
ChenXPChenCC (2004) On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management21(3): 305–324.
6.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
7.
CohnNEngelenJSchilperoordJ (2019) The grammar of emoji? Constraints on communicative pictorial sequencing. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications4(1): 1–18.
8.
DainasAHerringSC (2020) Interpreting emoji pragmatics. In: XieCYusFHaberlandH (eds) Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.108–144.
9.
DanesiM (2016) The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
10.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 80–92.
GeJ (2019) Emoji sequence use in enacting personal identity. In: Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, pp.426–438. New York: ACM.
13.
GeJ (2020) The functional building blocks of emoji in consumer engagement – A visual semiotic perspective. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric4(2): 16–32.
GeJGretzelU (2018) Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective. Journal of Marketing Management34(15–16): 1272–1295.
16.
GuntukuSCLiMTayLUngarLH (2019) Studying cultural differences in emoji usage across the East and the West. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media13(1): 226–235.
17.
HerringSC (2004) Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In: BarabSAKlingRGrayJH (eds.) Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.338–376.
18.
HerringSCDainasA (2017) “Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp.2185–2194. Waikoloa.
19.
HerringSCGeJ (2020) Do emoji sequences have a preferred word order? In: Companion proceedings of the 14th international AAAI conference on web and social media. pp.1–5. Atlanta.
KhandekarSHiggJBianY, et al. (2019) Opico: A study of emoji-first communication in a mobile social app. In: Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, pp.450–458. Fransisco.
23.
Kimura-ThollanderPKumarN (2019) Examining the” Global” language of emojis: Designing for cultural representation.” In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp.1–14. Glasgow.
24.
KonradAHerringSCChoiD (2020) Sticker and emoji use in Facebook messenger: Implications for graphicon change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(3): 217–235.
25.
LeeYJGretzelU (2014) Cross-cultural differences in social identity formation through travel blogging. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing31(1): 37–54.
26.
LiMChngEChongAYL, et al. (2019) An empirical analysis of emoji usage on Twitter. Industrial Management & Data Systems119(8): 1748–1763.
27.
LuXAiWLiuXZ, et al. (2016) Learning from the ubiquitous language: An empirical analysis of emoji usage of smartphone users. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing, pp.770–780. Heidelberg.
28.
MazurELiY (2016) Identity and self-presentation on social networking web sites: A comparison of online profiles of Chinese and American emerging adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture5(2): 101–118.
29.
McCullochG (2019) Because of Internet. New York: Riverhead Books.
30.
RoeleMWardJVan DuijnM (2020) Tweet with a smile: The selection and use of emoji on Twitter in the Netherlands and England. First Monday.
31.
RuiJStefanoneMA (2013) Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior29(1): 110–118.
32.
SearleJR (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay In The Philosophy Of Language, vol. 626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SiibakA (2009) Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace3(1). Available at: https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4218/3260 (accessed 16 May 2020).
TantucciVWangA (2018) Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics138: 60–76.
36.
TracyKRoblesJS (2013) Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford Press.
37.
WangYLiYGuiX, et al. (2019) Culturally-embedded visual literacy: A study of impression management via emoticon, emoji, sticker, and meme on social media in China. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3(CSCW): 1–24.
38.
WhitneyJJennexMElkinsA, et al. (2018) Don’t want to get caught? don’t say it: The use of emojis in online human sex trafficking ads. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
39.
ZhangMWuDD (2018) A cross-cultural analysis of celebrity practice in microblogging. East Asian Pragmatics3(2): 179–200.
40.
ZhouRHentschelJKumarN (2017) Goodbye text, hello emoji: Mobile communication on WeChat in China. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp.748–759. New York: ACM.
