This article explores the media representation of Muslims using critical discourse analysis (CDA). It emphasises the discursive construction of governmental paternalism that forms the dominant ideological disposition of China Daily’s (CD) coverage. The results reveal how Chinese official English newspapers facilitate the government’s dissemination of paternalistic discourse in the news of a large population of Chinese Muslims over the period. The investigation combines topic modelling with topos analysis to identify topics and topoi and to exhibit the ideology through the corpus compiled with CD’s news about Chinese Muslims. Our findings both uncover the extent to which CD is used to promote paternalistic discourse by topic and reveal how paternalism is constructed by topoi. CD can be seen to strongly legitimise the paternalistic framework corresponding with the government’s promotion of social development and security in the region. Reciprocally, most Chinese Muslims are portrayed as obedient and dependent Chinese citizens who benefit from the government’s intervention.
Al-HejinB (2015) Covering Muslim women: Semantic macrostructures in BBC News. Discourse & Communication9(1): 19–46.
2.
AllenIJ (2014) Rhetorical humanism vs. object-oriented ontology: The ethics of Archimedean points and levers. Substances43(3): 67–87.
3.
AnandD (2018) Colonization with Chinese characteristics: Politics of (in)security in Xinjiang and Tibet. Central Asian Survey38: 129–147.
4.
AtkinsonM (1989) Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Routledge.
5.
BakerP (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. New York: A&C Black.
6.
BakerP (2010) Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999-2005. Journal of Language and Politics9(2): 310–338.
7.
BakerPGabrielatosCMcEneryT (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BlommaertJ (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
ChengHHuDXuC, et al. (2017) Does government paternalistic care promote entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from the China Employer-Employee Survey. China Economic Journal10(1): 61–75.
KungL-Y (2006) National identity and ethno-religious identity: A critical inquiry into Chinese religious policy, with reference to the Uighurs in Xinjiang. Religion, State and Society34(4): 375–391.
18.
Le GrandJNewB (2015) Government Paternalism: Nanny State or Helpful Friend. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
LeeC-C (2010) Bound to rise: Chinese media discourses on the new global order. In: CurtiMShahH (eds) Reorienting Global Communication: Indian and Chinese Media Beyond Borders. Urbana, IL; Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 260–283.
20.
LingLHM (1994) Rationalizations for state violence in Chinese Politics: The hegemony of parental governance. Journal of Peace Research31(4): 393–405.
21.
LiuP (2012) 中国形象传播: 历史与变革. [Chinese Image Spreads: History and Change]. ISBN 9787514122503. Beijing, China: Economic Science Press.
22.
LuqiuLRYangF (2018) Islamophobia in China: News coverage, stereotypes, and Chinese Muslims’ perceptions of themselves and Islam. Asian Journal of Communication28(6): 598–619.
23.
MackerrasC (2014) Xinjiang in 2013: Problems and prospects. Asian Ethnicity15(2): 247–250.
PartingtonADuguidATaylorC (2013) Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
26.
SaichA (2012) The quality of governance in China: The citizen’s view. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP12-051. Available at: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/9924084 (accessed 2 February 2019).
27.
ShanWWengC (2010) China’s new policy in Xinjiang and its challenges. East Asian Policy2(3): 58–66.
28.
SongYLeeC-CHuangZ (2019) The news prism of nationalism versus globalism: How does the US, UK and Chinese elite press cover ‘China’s rise’?Journalism. Epub ahead of print 8 May. DOI: 10.1177/1464884919847143.
29.
StoneR (1994) Speaking to the foreign audience: Chinese foreign policy concerns as expressed in China Daily, January 1989-June 1993. International Communication Gazette53(1–2): 43–52.
30.
TörnbergATörnbergP (2016a) Combining CDA and topic modelling: Analyzing discursive connections between Islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum. Discourse & Society27(4): 401–422.
31.
TörnbergATörnbergP (2016b) Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modelling and critical discourse analysis. Discourse, Context and Media13(B): 132–142.
32.
Van DijkTA (2009) Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn.London: SAGE, pp. 73–95.
33.
WangT-YLiuH (2018) An emerging Asian model of governance and transnational knowledge transfer: An introduction. Journal of Asian Public Policy11(2): 121–135.
34.
WittebornS (2011) Gendering cyberspace: Transnational mappings and Uyghur diasporic politics. In: HegdeRS (ed.) Circuits of Visibility: Gender and Transnational Media Cultures. New York: New York University Press, pp. 268–283.
35.
WodakR (2001) The discourse-historical approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 63–94.
36.
WodakR (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
WodakR (2011) Suppression of the Nazi Past, coded Languages, and discourses of silence: Applying the discourse-historical approach to post-war anti-Semitism in Austria. In: SteinmetzW (ed.) Political Languages in the Age of Extremes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 351–370.
38.
WodakRDe cillaRReisiglM, et al. (2009) Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd edn.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
39.
WrightDBrookesG (2019) ‘This is England, speak English!’: A corpus-assisted critical study of language ideologies in the right-leaning British press. Critical Discourse Studies16(1): 56–83.
40.
ZhengL (2011) Media and Minkaohan Uyghurs: Representation, reaction and resistance. University of Colorado at Boulder. Available at: https://scholar.colorado.edu/jour_gradetds/19/ (accessed 12 May 2016).
